Feldman decided to eat his lunch with the men.
Tables with large black numbers painted on their tops were assigned them, and twice each month everyone was given a new number corresponding to one of the tables. They had to carry this number with them and show it to the dining-hall official if he asked to see it. The men had their special friends, of course, and sometimes moved beside them regardless of their assigned numbers. It was a major offense if they could not justify their seating, but they often took the risk. The dining-hall official moved arbitrarily among the tables, spot-checking.
Feldman, studying the men as they took their trays and moved silently to seats, could tell, just as surely as the dining-hall official, from the gestures and nudges and shufflings, which men were falsifying their assignments. It was queer how men properly assigned to a place noiselessly submitted to those who would force them in turn to seek false positions. To break silence if one was being pushed away from one’s proper place was permitted, of course, but such an action was considered a betrayal by the men and was severely punished by them. And since to scuffle openly in the dining hall was an even more serious offense than either sitting at an unassigned table or breaking silence, the displaced and expelled stalked nervously under the eyes of the official toward some hopefully unassigned space. (There were several such spaces: “free spaces” deliberately kept open by the warden; the unoccupied seats of the sick, of men on special-duty rosters, of men brooding in their cells.) Usually, so suspicious did they look, an official did not spot-check in vain, although the man caught was more frequently the moved than the mover. The official, silent himself, would tap a man on the left shoulder, and all the men at the table, so no con at the right table could slip his number to an interloper, had to place face up in a vacant corner of their trays the laminated plastic numbers they were forced to carry.
Occasionally there was an attempt to divert an official. Taking circuitous routes among the tables, prisoners might deliberately try to seem suspicious so as to make a fool of a guard, or to serve some friend actually counterfeiting a table assignment as a decoy. The men did not seem to understand that they were serving the warden’s ends and not their own when they played these jokes, by bringing astute and astuter officials into the dining hall. The beauty of the warden’s system did not escape Feldman, however. Like many other rules in the prison it seemed unbeatable, and provided the warden with still another means of testing the convicts. (“It accomplishes several things,” the warden later told Feldman. “For one, it exposes the queers. It gives me an insight into who might be planning an escape. It speeds up meals. It saves the state money. The men grab their trays and move on to their seats rapidly so as not to be shouldered out of the way. They take less food on their trays.”) They might have tried to trade numbers, Feldman thought, but they were a disorganized bunch, and this never seemed to occur to them. They relied instead on risk and change. Yet Feldman was aware of the astonishing fact that it was love — the conspirators, the escape-planners, could always meet in holes and corners; the rules, if they had to contend only with the plotters, would have forced them to plot elsewhere — which made the system work, that there would always be those who would take the risks.
Reckless, reckless people, he thought contemptuously as a new man, obviously an intruder, moved into place beside him. It was a stunning fact, he thought, that whoever the man’s friend was, he would not even be able to talk to him. Watching the man’s eyes, Feldman spotted the friend. The new man looked at him with something like love, and the friend smiled briefly and looked down at his tray shyly.
The others at the table were as conscious as Feldman of the friendship. They smiled openly, fondly, as at lovers who have overcome difficulties and earned a sympathy which costs no one anything. Indeed, Feldman himself felt a fillip of kindredness and had a sense of being at table at a resort, or aboard ship.
So they sat, each man conscious of the number that gave him the right to be there, but each with a little viciousness in reserve, his self-righteousness underwritten by the fact that he could produce his number on demand. However, the viciousness may have been softened by the jeopardy of the intruder and regard for his lover’s boldness, they would, if the need arose, have dissolved in a moment the accidental community which that boldness had made manifest, and brought guiltlessly and quickly to bear their detachment, even the man who had inspired the risk, the surprised friend like the obligationless guest of honor at a party.
Feldman was aware that the enforced silence made the companionship of the two friends somehow deeper, more meaningful. They all felt it. They felt, too, all the significance of the pair’s proximity and were charged with a kind of sympathetic giddiness, a sense of the glowingly unstated, of the imminent. It was just as if someone they did not hear stood behind their backs, or as if, in the dark, they could sense the nearness of walls, the presence of furniture.
Then something happened that had never happened.
“The Talking Lamp is lit,” a voice said suddenly over the loudspeaker, startling them. It was Warden Fisher.
“How did you know where I was? I haven’t seen you since the new assignments,” the friend said.
“I was behind you in the line last night, Joseph. Are you angry?”
“Of course I’m not angry,” Joseph said. “But you took a risk. You could have gotten us both into trouble.”
“I didn’t think about that, Joseph,” the man said gloomily. Then he brightened. “But isn’t it wonderful?” he asked, reaching across the table. “We can talk. It’s a miracle.”
“No. You mustn’t touch me, Bob.”
Feldman wondered how the other men took this. He looked around the table, but no one seemed interested in the pair any longer. They were more concerned with the warden’s announcement, clearly puzzled by the opportunity to talk in the dining hall. They contained themselves, halting in their silences, like inexperienced people asked to give their opinions into a microphone. Then, gradually, they found things to say.
A man leaned toward Feldman and spoke in a low voice. “I thought it was you he come to see, Feldman. It surprised me.”
“No, of course not. I don’t know him.”
The man laughed, and Feldman was conscious suddenly of hips touching his on the crowded bench, conscious of shoulders brushing his own, conscious of hands lifting spoons, conscious of men’s tongues. Under the table someone stroked his thigh.
“Stop it.”
“Sure,” a man said, winking. “You’re not my type.”
“Feldman isn’t anyone’s type,” Joseph said.
Feldman couldn’t eat with them. (I’ll starve, he thought, thinking of the dozens of meals he had still to eat with these men.) Undeclared, in the silence, their friendship — their love — had a certain dignity, and even the imagined possibility of their acts together had a built-in innocence: the allowance one made for life under difficulties, life against odds. Talking, they seemed grotesque. What lay behind it all was more of the same, importunateness, rough will. Probably Joseph did not even care for Bob.
“How long has it been, old-timer,” one man asked a trusty Feldman had seen in his own cellblock, “since the Talking Lamp’s been lit?”
“Not in my time,” the old man said. He turned to the man on Feldman’s right. “You ever know it to happen, Bob?”
“Once,” Bob said. “When Fisher had been here a year,” he said. “Isn’t that right, Joseph?”
“It was on the first anniversary of Fisher’s system,” Joseph said.
Feldman, frightened, perceived something complex and astonishing: Bob and Joseph had been softened. They confronted him, he realized, not as men but as changed men. Feldman saw that very plainly. They might have been old acquaintances with whom he had lost contact for twenty years and suddenly saw again in their acquired differences as in a costume. These softened men had once been dangerous. The length of their terms here proved the violence of their crimes. It meant that if love was what lay behind the efficiency of the warden’s vicious system and made that system work, then it was viciousness that ultimately made love work. Character tumbled, and even these men could not finally hang on to themselves. They’d had the tenaciousness of murderers, of men who took guns in their hands and pulled triggers. But even these — they were talking quietly now, courting sedately — hard cases had proved malleable in the end. Appetite died last; nobody lost his sweet tooth. It was the most nearly immortal attribute of men. As a businessman, Feldman was impressed by the warden’s techniques (What an operation this is, he thought), but as a man he was terrified. Oh, men’s troubles, he thought; that warden, he’ll get me too.