Now let's talk a little bit about tactics and strategy. Our strategy is to squeeze government forces everywhere, to interfere with them everywhere and to create problems. We must mend sabotage and sabotage in enterprises, carry out terrorist attacks and sabotage, kill civil servants. First of all, of course, we are talking about corrupt officials,although not only about them. The aim of this strategy is to shake up the political situation in the country. Our people don't like the government at all, but they are afraid of it. State propaganda every day tells citizens: лThis regime is the only possible one, there is no alternative to it and there will be no alternative!╗. Citizens believe all this and think: лThis government, of course, is not very, but there is no alternative.╗. We have to show that there is an alternative. If we act correctly, people will quickly see that there is real opposition in the country. An opposition that not only smiles against corruption, but which can offer a good program. And not the kind of one that was like Navalny, but suchthat it could be implemented. For the benefit of society, of course. When people see that this opposition is not afraid of riot policemen, guards, police, or even the FSB, will see that the opposition is waging a guerrilla war against the state, they will understand that this regime is not eternal, as propaganda claims. After that, the authorities will begin to lose their positions irrevocably. You see, when the police disperse the demonstrators, and their leaders are put in prisons, they show the citizens and the world: look how terrible we are. This demoralizes the opposition. Many people are beginning to think that the regime is so strong that it cannot be resisted at all. But if people see that the country has started guerrillas, see that these guerrillas successfully fight with the government, and the police can not do anything about it, Ц then the citizens will cease to be afraid of the regime. He will lose his footing in the people. Further it's fall is only a matter of time. Now I will sum up the above. We must sow panic and chaos, incite conflicts, sabotage and sabotage, carry out terrorist attacks and sabotage. Our first goal is to destabilize the situation in the country.
This, however, is only part of the strategy. It only explains our priorities. As to say before the second part of our plan, it will be outlined by me further.
It is no secret that the political regime in Russia is weak and absolutely insignificant. He is the best example of the лpaper tiger╗ Mao was talking about. Today, our government is relentlessly confronted with many challenges. These problems are economic, social, political and whatever. The main thing here is that these very problems are very much. They fall on the crowning headsof our rulers from all sides. American and Chinese imperialists are attacking Russia from abroad. Corruption scandals shake her from within. The decline of the economy undermines the power of the state and leads to the rapid impoverishment of the population. All the above in sum angers the people and excites discontent in it. On top of that, the country has been led by guerrillas fighting against the power of freemasons and hucksters. Of course, in such circumstances, the question of the demise of today's bonapartist regime becomes only a matter of time. Sooner or later, the people, driven by the talentless policy of our government to the full poverty, Ц will rise up against the clique of bandits and murderers. Then the Putin regime will come to an end!
At the same time, the situation in Russia should not be idealized. A future revolution to overthrow the existing regime is, of course, inevitable. But as for the nature of this revolution, it may be difficult... The fact is that in modern Russia the proletariat is still very undeveloped. лWhy so?╗ Ц you ask. I'll explain it. You all know how privatisation took place. Of course, we love to say that, they say, it was not privatization, but just a robbery. That is why, by the way, in Russian language, the verb лprivatize╗ is often used as a synonym for the word лsteal╗. It should be remembered, however, that it was not only prominent officials who tookover factories and factories. Ordinary citizens were also allowed to pocket a little. It was mainly about city apartments and cottages. And forgive me for the liberal jargon, but as a result of privatization Russia has became a country of owners. What does this mean? This means that we have the vast majority of the population has private property. And that's where the fun begins. The fact is that if you have private property (i.e. capital), you can no longer be a proletarian. A proletarian is not just a hired worker. He's a total beggar employee. An employee who is completely devoid of property. A lot of our left-wingers here wouldn't agree with me. They think that the proletarian is absolutely any person living on a salary. If so, it turns out that president Putin is a proletarian! But let's leave this scholastic dispute! Of course, if you really want, the person who has an apartment, a country plot and a car can be called a proletarian. But here is the question: will such a лproletarian╗ be revolutionary? I guess not. When Marx said that the proletariat had nothing to lose but his chains, he did not exaggerate. The proletarians of that time existed on the verge of starvation. That's why, in fact, they were so revolutionary. When you clearly face the prospect of starvation, it is not terrible to go to the barricades. If they kill you, nothing! You're going to die a little! And if they put you in jail, that's a good thing! They're feeding in prison! But if you have an apartment, a car and a cottage, you will think a thousand times before you go to the rally. Even if this rally is legal. And it's clear: you have something to lose. You're afraid of losing your property, your own scarce capital. That's why you re barely a revolutionary. The majority of our citizens are owners! So little bourgeois. Very small, very small, but still bourgeois. In doing so, they may well be hired employees. No contradiction is here. Explain in the example. Let's say the man has two urban apartments. One of them rents out the rent, and the other one lives on the other. He, however, lacks the money rented out of the rent. That's why he works at the office. If our bourgeois lose his job, yes, he'll have to cut his expenses, but he s not gonna get hunger. You can give me another example. A man has an apartment and a car. He works for some company. Then he's fired. He sits behind his car and becomes a cabbie. That is, in case of trouble, the property helps him out. Of course, our petty bourgeoisie is different from the лclassic╗. It used to consist mainly of artisans, shopkeepers and peasants. Now this class is represented mostly by employees. These employees, however, have capital. Sometimes very decent. What does it end up with? And it turns out that the majority of the population of Russia is a small bourgeoisie. At the same time, you must understand that the consciousness of these people is appropriate. That is, they are typical philisters, лlittle people╗ from classical Russian literature. They are not too prone to revolutionaryism. The urban petty bourgeoisie simultaneously receives certain benefits from capitalism, but also suffers from it. On the one hand, capitalism for the petty bourgeois is a ticket to cheap resorts in Egypt and Turkey. On the other hand, a mortgage he will never pay. On the one hand Ц лMcDuck╗ and American movies. On the other hand, low wages and constant fear of losing their jobs. This is the intermediate position of the petty bourgeoisie! Intermediate between the proletariat and the full-fledged bourgeoisie. But, as you know, nothing stands still. Our favorite burghers are no exception. лWhere are they going?╗ Ц you ask. The answer is simple: towards poverty. From Marxist literature we know that the petty bourgeoisie always strives to go bankrupt. This is because the law of capital concentration works. In short, it says: the rich are getting richer, Ц the poor are getting poorer. The effect of this law in times of crisis is particularly felt. Fortunately, now is such a period! The number of owners in Russia is falling. People are going bankrupt. Here you can give one good example for clarity. It is taken from life, and therefore especially accurate. One family managed to get a good living out through privatization. They took away four apartments, two cottages, one cafe and ashop. By the mid-nineties, their store had closed. The default of the ninety-eighth destroyed the cafe. In the zero state of affairs a little got better and my friends began to take loans in huge quantities. Then there was the famous crisis of two thousand eighth years. The head of the family lost his job. Loans began to give nothing, and therefore the bankers took from the family first both country plots, and then the apartment. By the time the family blinked the remaining three apartments by the age of two thousand. At the moment, the people who are identified are not in their own dwelling and are in the removable apartment. This example shows very well how the removal of the petty bourgeoisie is going. I have to say here that the process is concerned with not only Russia. The small bourgeois of Europe and America are also rapidly devastating. As a result of this destruction, some ignorance even talked about certain лprecariat╗. That's what they call employees, deprived of their property and a stable earnings. In reality, introducing this new term is completely unnecessary. The proletariat of the nineteenth century was also deprived of property and of a constant earnings. So let's not bear the terms. Little bourgeoisie is begging and becoming the proletariat. No лprecariat╗.