We talked about the class approach. Now we need to talk about something else. We're going to talk about how to build a speech. Of course, I have to build the speech according to logic. You have to get down to business first. It is also necessary to remember the psychological aspect. You need to get people's attention from the very beginning. Here sits a man, spits in the ceiling, barely from boredom does not fall asleep. You have to unwind it, wake him up. He should pay attention to the speaker. I'm at modern conferences. All the speakers, of course, are rattling the devil knows what's under his nose. The audience, of course, misses. Listeners prefer to stare at their phone. Moreover, I understand them and do not condemn them at all. Speakers there speak so badly that I'm afraid to fall asleep sometimes. If you don't want to be like the лoratores submonerandii vulgariis╗ I've just mentioned, then you need to learn how to slow the audience down. Literally and figuratively. And I'm not joking right now. You can tell a vulgar anecdote or shout loudly: лComrades!╗. You can do something else, it's something that should definitely attract the attention of the audience. And now you see that people have started listening to you. That's very good. It just means you can start. Then you give a speech. You speak the way I taught you before. And remember the principle of logic. That is, first we need to talk about the most important, about the most important, and then about the details of the main or insignificant issues. And now, finally, you're finishing. In the end, we need to draw some brief conclusions from what was said before. You make them. You need to summarize very, very briefly all that you said before. If the speech is political, then the conclusions are followed by a call. If it's political, you don't just have to talk about how bad things are. At the end of the speech you have to call the people to the barricades! Or call on him to go to the guerrillas. Or encourage people to become terrorists. It already depends on the specific circumstances.
Now we will discuss common issues that arise in different situations. If, for example, the public does not listen, then what should be done? If people do not listen, we choose one person from the public and begin to poison him. Let it be, for example, a woman. We should say to her: лWoman in green dress! Stop powdering your spout and look at me. I'm a handsome man and a good speaker, and you don't notice me at all. You're being cheeky and daring!╗. Then it will be necessary to say something unpleasant about the appearance of this lady, about her moral qualities. All this will bring you back to the audience's attention. That's what you've dealt with.
The second issue is public debate. There is nothing complicated about public debate. It is necessary to remember that the interlocutor needs to impose his opinion. This means that the interlocutor barely closes his mouth as you open it. You should talk incessantly, but at the same time the interlocutor should not be allowed to speak under any circumstances. The more you say, the better. Ideally, you should take all the time of discussion with your own monologue speech alone. Second, you need to ask provocative questions. You have to constantly hurt these questions the feelings of your interlocutor. You need to drag the discussion to the discussion of unpleasant moments for the interlocutor. We need to give him a real bullying, how to make fun of the most holy things for him. It would be desirable to bring your opponent to hysterics, to make him burst into tears or yell at you. The public will then decide that your opponent is either inadequate or even crazy. In short, to bring the opponent to hysterics Ц it is still necessary to be able. And in order to be able to be able to train for a long time on living people!
The third issue came to me concerning the practice of agitation in personal conversation. There's nothing too complicated here. It's about goodwill. Listen to your conversationalist! Look, I'm talking! People love to be listened. They want to be heard, believe me. Don't Be truthful. Your opinion is carefully carefully carefully, the primacy is necessarily monitoring the reaction of the interviewer to him. That's it!
The last question was how to overcome the fear of speaking in public. Well, there are simple exercises for that. You have to put on stupid clothes and go in it on a busy street. The public's fear is treated quite painfully. You have to go out on purpose and embarrass yourself. We need to make passers-by look at you and say: лFo-o-o... He's so mean! He must be crazy.╗. That's the way to embarrass yourself more often. The more you do it, the better for you. Only through the experience of terrible public shame can you overcome the fear of the public. You can follow the example of Diogenes the Cynic, who masturbated right in the town square, where the people drowned. You can molest peoplewith an offer to have same-sex. In short, these subtleties depend only on your imagination. If you do such exercises diligently enough, you will turn from shy into. In short, it is even good for the speaker.
Okay, we talked about mental exercise. They said a lot, but not all of them. I'll have to go back to that later. It's possible more than once.
Now we need to talk about exercise.
In a healthy communist body Ц a healthy communist spirit! But we will talk about it tomorrow Ц we have absolutely no time left.