"I'm fine. I can't say the same for Max."
"I know," he said grimly. "I went to see him yesterday. Why wouldn't he listen to me? Why wouldn't he listen to Dr. Luca?"
"He's listening now. He won't talk to Antuono."
He glanced sharply at me. "I didn't tell him not to talk to Antuono. I told him not to shout to everyone in Bologna that he was going to do it. I want him to talk to Antuono if he knows something. You think I don't want those pictures back?"
I said something soothing. Di Vecchio scratched irritably at the grizzled edge of his red beard and grumbled. "Well," I said, "let's get down to business."
My business with Di Vecchio was the same as it had been with Clara Gozzi: going over the particulars arising from the loan of paintings to Northerners in Italy. This took a lot longer to get through with Di Vecchio than it had with Clara. Partly this was because the Pinacoteca was lending us twenty- four pictures, compared to Clara's four, but mostly it was because Clara was an easygoing sort who was happy to trust the details to others, while Di Vecchio was a fussy stickler who—well, Di Vecchio was Di Vecchio. It took us two hours, most of which was spent trying to answer his finicky questions on insurance; specifically, on the federal special indemnification grant we'd gotten over and above the usual National Endowment of the Arts funding. Like Clara, I'm not too detail-oriented, and it was rough going.
"Very good," Di Vecchio said, terminating the exacting discussion at last. Folders and finders were shoved into a desk drawer, and he leaned back—that is to say, he sat up straighter—in his unyielding chair. "I understand you were at Salvatorelli this morning when the Eagle of Lombardy swooped down on his prey. Is it true you rode back to Bologna with the great man?"
I wasn't surprised to learn he already knew about it. The art world grapevine is amazing, practically instantaneous. "It's true," I said. "We had a chat."
"And is he getting anywhere, our Eagle?"
"Well, as I understand it, the Morandi and the Carrà —"
He jerked impatiently. "I'm not talking about the Morandi and the Carrà. He hasn't been sent to Bologna to recover Morandis and Carràs."
"He thinks there may be a connection, though, or at least that one could develop. He thinks Filippo Croce set this up as a sort of advertisement to the people who have the paintings."
"It could be. What is he doing about this?"
"I don't know. I suppose he's keeping an eye on Croce to see what develops."
He made a hissing sound. "To see what develops," he repeated disdainfully. "Forgive me, but I don't feel cheered. Christopher, they've already had those paintings for almost two years. Who knows what's happened to them by now? For all we know, by now they've been—"
Don't say it, I thought.
"—carved up and recombined. Would we even know them?"
Carved up and recombined. Words to strike dismay into the heart of the most steel-nerved of curators. Di Vecchio was referring to the barbaric, increasingly common practice of mutilating art to make it more saleable and less recognizable at the same time. A skillful and corrupt restorer, for example, might take a five-by-seven-foot late-Renaissance mythological painting, too big for today's rooms, and chop it into fragments, creating three or four smaller pictures, and usually throwing away—throwing away!—twenty to forty percent of the original canvas as unusable.
Or a beautiful old French cabinet might have the maindron—the proud stamp of its maker—removed, and the rich old finish stripped and redone. Or the signature of a famous sixteenth-century painter might be changed to that of a lesser- known one. Or the painting itself might be altered in any of a thousand ways.
At first glance, these alterations don't seem to make much sense. Don't they drastically reduce the value of the art pieces? Yes, but art thieves—or rather the receivers or dealers who hire them, which is usually the way it's done nowadays—can cheerfully absorb the losses. The economics are simple: Say you hire a gang to steal five paintings worth $800,000, for which they're paid $10,000. You then pay your crooked restorer $5,000 apiece to change them, or $25,000 in all. Now they are much less traceable, but of course they're only worth, say, $300,000.
So what? When they are sold you will have invested $35,000 and gotten a return of $300,000. Even an unenlightened business mind like mine knows a good deal when it sees one like that.
"You don't really think that's what happened to them?" I asked, looking for reassurance. The idea that someone might have butchered those Tintorettos, the Giorgione, the Veronese ... my God, it didn't bear thinking about.
"We must face the possibility," Di Vecchio replied.
"But the Rubens," I said, forced to reassure myself. "Clara's Rubens. It turned up whole."
"True, but of all them it's the picture least able to be altered. How can you cut up into several paintings a portrait of a single subject? And the subject, Hélène Fourment, is well-known, and associated with Rubens and only Rubens. She would be very difficult to disguise."
I resigned myself to the fact that I wasn't going to get any reassurance.
"Perhaps that's why it was returned," he continued. "It was the only way to collect any money."
"But nobody collected any money. Blusher donated it to the museum."
"Oh? Well, that's very puzzling. "
"Amedeo, how did they ever get in here? Weren't the alarms working?"
He bristled. "Of course they were working. We have four separate systems on individual circuits."
"Then how did they manage it?"
He glowered angrily at me for a moment, then sighed, took off his glasses, and wearily rubbed the lumpy bridge of his nose between thumb and forefinger. "They used a ladder to enter through the window of a bathroom here on the upper floor."
"Not through a skylight?"
"A bathroom. Sometime earlier, from inside, they had used tape to deactivate the alarm-latch of this window, "
"From inside? But if they'd already gotten in, why didn't they just take the paintings then and there? Why risk coming back and fooling around with ladders?"
"I must assume that the window was modified during the day, while the museum was open and people were about. The theft itself took place between twelve-thirty and one- thirty at night."
"I don't get it, Amedeo. Even if they took care of the window alarm, what about the inside systems? I mean, you must have sensors that pick up people walking around. Infrared beams . . ."
"Photo-electric barriers, movement sensors, pressure alarms, everything you could wish. But," he said, looking pained, "every night at twelve-thirty come the people who clean, or so they did at the time. We could not have them setting off bells at every step, so when they would arrive, security became somewhat…well…"
Sloppy, I said to myself.
"Flexible," Di Vecchio said.
I leaned forward. "Amedeo, if they knew about that, then there must have been some inside involvement, someone on the museum staff."
"That is extremely unlikely," he said stiffly.
I didn't think so. The art world had a long, unhappy history of betrayal by its own.
"But didn't the police question them?" I asked.
"Of course. Aren't the workers always the first to be hounded? The police, the carabinieri, the prosecutor, every conceivable arm of the politico-commercial apparatus. Naturally, nothing of value was learned."
When Di Vecchio started going on about workers and the politico-commercial apparatus, there wasn't much to be gained from continuing the discussion, and I stood up, thanked him, and began to say good-bye.