Chiurco’s expression wavered briefly, a moment of indecision. But Hardy exuded encouragement, and Chiurco gave him his answer. “He didn’t know it, not at that time.”
“Mr. Hunt didn’t know Mr. Preslee’s name, that is?”
“Right. We just knew that Vogler had a partner in the robbery he’d committed. We didn’t know who it was.”
“So again, how did you find that this partner was Mr. Preslee?”
“As I said,” Chiurco still cooperative, but some exasperation breaking through the veneer, “I did a Web search.”
“You looked on Google or Yahoo?” Hardy asked. “That type of thing?”
“Yes. I don’t remember precisely which one.”
“Do you mean you don’t remember which search engine you used?”
“Yes. There are a lot of them. Prison databases, city and county records, and so on.”
“And looking on one of those databases, you found a site that somehow informed you about the crime that Mr. Vogler and Mr. Preslee had been convicted of, is that right?”
“Yes.”
“So you must have checked on Mr. Vogler’s name first?”
“That was the only name I had, so yes.”
“And then keying off Mr. Vogler, you found a related site for Mr. Preslee, correct?”
“Yes.”
Nodding, Hardy again went back to his desk and picked up another couple of sheets of paper, then came back to the witness. “Now, Mr. Chiurco, I have here in my hand a copy of the cover page of the criminal proceeding that resulted in Mr. Vogler’s conviction and sentencing back in 1997.” Thanking his stars for Glitsky and his access, Hardy stepped closer to the witness box. “Would you please read for the jury the title of this case? Right there inside the bracketed area.”
Now with a bit of reluctance, Chiurco came forward and accepted the paper. “The People of the State of California v. Dylan Vogler. Case number SC- 137804.”
“Thank you.” Hardy held out his hand, and Chiurco handed him back his copy. “And now, if you please, would you read the title of this other case, which for the jury’s benefit resulted in Mr. Preslee’s conviction and sentencing?”
Working to regain a semblance of cordiality, Chiurco took the next sheet of paper. “The People of the State of California v. Levon Preslee. Case number SC- 139504.”
Hardy again took the paper back. “As you can see, Mr. Chiurco, and as you’ve just read to the jury, these are different case numbers, are they not?”
“Yes. Obviously.”
“Obviously. But, if these cases are indeed separate and unconnected, this leads to the question of how you referenced one of them and had it lead you to the other. Can you tell us how you did that?”
Chiurco sat back, his face set, and bounced his shoulders a few times. “I don’t exactly remember. They showed up together in one of the Web sites. That’s all I can tell you.”
“And from that you got Mr. Preslee’s name and then were able to find his address and go out to his house, is that right?”
“Right.”
“A house where you had never been before. Is that correct?”
“Yes.”
“A house that you’d certainly never been inside?”
“Right.”
“A house where police could never, under any circumstances, have found your fingerprints. Is that correct?”
Chiurco’s face had gone dark now, and he turned to the judge, then back to Hardy. “What’s this all about? What do my fingerprints have to do with anything?”
Hardy stepped closer to the witness. And after the earlier two witnesses Braun clearly was inclined to give him his head. “Mr. Chiurco,” he said, “did you not already know who Mr. Preslee was, and that he had been Mr. Vogler’s accomplice in the robbery that sent them both to prison, when you received your assignment from Mr. Hunt?”
“No, I did not.”
“In fact, didn’t you request the assignment from Mr. Hunt so that you could keep from Mr. Hunt the reality of your relationship with Mr. Preslee?”
“No, I did not.”
“Are you saying you did not have a relationship with Mr. Preslee?”
“Yes, that’s what I’m saying.”
“You hadn’t been to his home before as a guest?”
“That’s right. I’ve already said that.”
“Yes, you did,” Hardy said. “Then perhaps you can explain the testimony we just listened to this morning from Officer Jessica Cunningham of the San Francisco police lab, who identified your fingerprints inside Mr. Preslee’s home.”
Chiurco’s eyes shot out beyond Hardy, past Hunt, to the back door, over to the side doors. “Obviously, she either made a mistake or she lied. I’ve never been inside the place.”
Hardy moved a step closer to him. “Are you telling the court that you hadn’t seen both Mr. Vogler and Mr. Preslee together at Bay Beans West in the last weeks of their lives?”
“I don’t know where you get any of this.”
“If I were to tell you there were two witnesses-”
“Well, they’re lying, too, whoever they were.”
Hardy now hung his head, half turned briefly to the jury, his face impassive. “Mr. Chiurco, isn’t it true that you attended the University of San Francisco here in the city between 1992 and 1995?”
Suddenly, at this gambit, Chiurco’s back went straight, his head snapped quickly from side to side. Hardy, aware of the bass rumble behind him starting to develop in the gallery, nevertheless pressed the attack. “Mr. Chiurco? Your Honor?”
Braun glared out to the gallery, her gavel poised. Then leaned over the bench. “The witness will please answer the question.”
Chiurco shrugged into his sports coat. “Yes.”
“And while you were there, were you not acquainted with both Mr. Vogler and Mr. Preslee?”
This time, as the gallery fairly erupted behind Hardy, he stood locked into eye contact with Chiurco while Braun gaveled the crowd back into silence.
“Mr. Chiurco?”
“I think they were both there when I was, yes.”
“And if we just heard from a witness, who said she knew all of you back then, testify that you were close friends of both of them, would that witness have been telling the truth?”
No answer.
“That’s the truth, isn’t it, Paco?”
All belligerence now. “Who’s Paco?”
“You are, Mr. Chiurco, or you were, weren’t you?” Hardy kept waiting for the judge to step in to advise Chiurco of his Fifth Amendment rights, but if she wasn’t going to do it, he sure as hell wasn’t going to do it for her. This man had killed at least two people, probably three, and had tried to frame his client, and Hardy couldn’t possibly have cared less about his rights.
Chiurco, still unresponsive, pulled at his tie, cleared his throat.
Hardy let a few seconds pass, silence settling into the room until it was complete. “Mr. Chiurco,” he asked, “where do you buy your coffee?”
“All over the place.”
“Have you ever bought coffee at Bay Beans West on Haight Street?”
“I might have. I can’t say for sure.”
“Mr. Chiurco, did you not tell your employer, Mr. Hunt, that you were a regular customer of Mr. Vogler’s marijuana business at Bay Beans West? If you’d like, we can have Mr. Hunt come up here and so testify.”
The witness did not move, did not speak.
“Mr. Chiurco?”
“I don’t have to answer that question. It might tend to incriminate me.”
“So you’re invoking the Fifth Amendment?”
“Only against whether or not I bought marijuana, yes.”
“All right,” Hardy said. “Let’s move to another topic. Do you own a handgun?”
Chiurco brought his hands up to his mouth, pulled at the sides of his face. “All right. I own a gun. So what?”
“What make of gun?”
But Chiurco just shook his head. “That’s all. I’m not saying anything else.”