“No conference,” said the judge. “Each of you must reach his conclusion independently, write down the number of the boy you think matches the cachet, and have done with it.”
“Are you sure someone hasn't held out the boy in question?” asked one Slave Finder.
“What you are asking me,” said the judge, “is if I am either corrupt or a fool. Would you care to specify which accusation you are inquiring about?” After that the Finders puzzled in silence.
“Gentlemen,” said the judge– and was his tone somewhat dry when he called them that? “You have had three minutes. I was told your identification would be instant. Please write and have done.”
They wrote. They signed their papers. They handed them to the judge.
“Please, return to your seats while I tabulate the results,” said the judge.
Verily had to admire the way the judge showed no expression as he sorted through the papers. But it also frustrated him. Would there be no hint of the outcome?
“I'm disappointed,” said the judge. “I had expected that the much-vaunted powers and the famous integrity of the Slave Finders would give me unanimous results. I had expected that you would either unanimously point the finger at one boy, or unanimously declare that the boy could not be one of this group. Instead, I find quite a range of answers. Three of you did declare under penalty of perjury that none of these boys matched the cachet. But four of you have named various boys– again, under penalty of perjury. Specifically, the four of you named three different boys. The only two who seemed to be in agreement both happened to be seated together, at my far right. Since you are the only two who agree in accusing one of the boys, I think we'll check your assertion first. Bailiff, please remove the hood from the head of boy number five.”
The bailiff did as he was asked. The boy was Black, but he was not Arthur Stuart.
“You two– are you certain, do you swear before God, that this is the boy who matches the cachet? Remember please that it is your license to practice your profession in the state of Wobbish that hangs in the balance, for if you are found to be unreliable or dishonest, you will never be permitted to bring a slave back across the river again.”
What they also knew, however, was that if they now backed down, they would be liable for charges of perjury. And the boy was Black.
“No sir, I am certain this is the boy,” said one. The other nodded emphatically.
“Now, let's look at the other two boys that were named. Take the hoods from numbers one and two.”
One of them was Black, the other White.
The Finder who named a White boy covered his face with his hands. “Again, knowing that your license is at stake, are you both prepared to swear that the boy you named is an exact match?”
The Finder who named the White boy began to stammer, “I don't know, I just don't, I was sure, I thought it was…”
“The answer is simple– do you continue to swear that this boy is an exact match, or did you lie under oath when you named him?”
The Finders who had sworn that the cachet matched no one were smiling now– they knew, obviously, that the others had lied, and were enjoying their torment.
“I did not lie,” said the Finder who named the White boy.
“Neither did I,” said the other defiantly. “And I still think I'm right. I don't know how these other boys could get it so wrong.”
“But you– you don't think you're right, do you? You don't think some miracle turned that slave baby White, do you?”
“No, sir. I must be… mistaken.”
“Give me your license. Right now.”
The miserable Finder stood up and handed the judge a leather case. The judge took from the case a piece of paper with an official seal on it. He wrote in the margin and then on the back; then he signed it and crimped it with his own seal. “There you go,” he said to the Finder. “You understand that if you're ever caught attempting to practice the profession of Slave Finding in the state of Hio, you will be arrested and tried and, when convicted, you will face at least ten years in prison?”
“I understand,” said the humiliated man.
“And you are also aware that Hio maintains a reciprocity arrangement with the states of Huron, Suskwahenny, Irrakwa, Pennsylvania, and New Sweden? So that the same or similar penalties will apply to you there if you attempt to practice this profession?”
“I understand,” he said again.
“Thank you for your help,” said the judge. “You should only be grateful that you were incompetent, for if I had cause to suspect you of perjury, it would have been prison and the lash, I assure you, for if I thought that you had willfully named this boy falsely, I would have no mercy on you. You may go.”
The others obviously got the message. As the unfortunate man fled the courtroom, the other three who had named one boy or another steeled themselves for what was to come.
“Sheriff Doggly,” said the judge, “would you kindly inform us of the identity of these two boys who stand identified by three of our panel of Finders?”
“Sure, Your Honor,” said Doggly. “These two is Mock Berry's boys, James and John. Peter's near growed and Andrew and Zebedee was too small.”
“You're sure of their identity?”
“They've lived here in Hatrack all their lives.”
“Any chance that either of them is, in fact, the child of a runaway slave?”
“No chance. For one thing, the dates are all wrong. They're both way too old– the Berry boys is always short for their age, kind of late-blooming roses if you know what I mean, then they just shoot up like spring grass, cause Peter's about the tallest fellow around here. But these boys, they was already clever little tykes well known around town before ever the slave that cachet belongs to was born.”
The judge turned to the Finders. “Well, now. I wonder how it happens that you appointed for slavery these two freeborn Black children.”
One of them spoke up immediately. “Your Honor, I will protest this whole procedure. We were not brought here to be placed on trial ourselves, we were brought here to practice our profession and–”
The gavel slammed down on the desk. “You were brought here to practice your profession, that is true. Your profession requires that when you make an identification, it must be assumed by all courts of law to be both honest and accurate. Whenever you practice your profession, here or in the field, your license is on the line, and you know it. Now, tell me at once, did you lie when you identified these boys, or were you merely mistaken?”
“What if we was just guessing?” one of them asked. Verily almost laughed out loud.
“Guessing, in this context, would be lying, since you were swearing that the boy you named was a match for the cachet, and if you had to guess, then he was not a match. Did you guess?”
The man thought about it for a moment. “No sir, I didn't lie. I was just plain wrong I reckon.”
Another man tried a different tack. “How do we know this sheriff isn't lying?”
“Because,” said the judge, “I already met all these boys, and their parents, and saw their birth records in the county archive. Any more questions before you decide whether you'll lose your license or be bound over for trial as perjurers?”
The two remaining Finders quickly agreed that they had been mistaken. Everyone waited while the judge signed and sealed the limitation on their licenses. “You gentlemen may also go.”
They went.
Verily rose to his feet. “Your Honor, may I request that these young men who were not identified be allowed to remove their hoods? I fear that they may be growing quite uncomfortable.”
“By all means. Bailiff, it's certainly time.”
The hoods came off. The boys all looked relieved. Arthur Stuart was grinning.
To the three remaining Finders, the judge said, “You are under oath. Do you swear that none of these boys matches the cachet belonging to Mr. Cavil Planter?”