Any force that most of the time positions itself left of the today's freedom equilibrium towards totalitarianism is in the freedom-haters camp. This is a dynamic process due to inner laws of development and usually the degree of totalitarianism of those forces steadily worsens, and they become more enemies of people and freedom, as times change. The scientific basis that explains what makes them the enemies of the people is in their interference with the self-regulating mechanisms with the feed-back loop in society and economics. As more control over society and economy they exert, as worse they hurt us due to distortions, deformities, inner tensions and disruption of the freedom, of the free market, which is the only possible way to optimize outcome of the immensely complex socioeconomic systems in the dynamic stability state. As more the totalitarians , the governments interfere– as worse the life is for the people. Of course, their allies in the MSM have a state of the art demagougery skills to create a false air of "noble intentions", of "protecting the disadvantaged one", and they expose their essence only in their actions and in the results of their action. Actions speak volumes.
World-wide situation:
Soft tyranny, soft totalitarianism of the Eurosocialism and Nanny State.
In Europe it started in 19th century in Bismarck's Germany, but it became the mainstream policy after WW II with a statism.
1) Statism (etatism) is when a state, a government takes away people's sovereignty and usurps the "right" to control society and economy. This is an early stage of the development of the totalitarianism. 2 The official goal of statism is to create a Nanny-State, where the government assumes the role of a Nanny, forcing people to become an infantile child, promising to take care of them from from the crib to the grave in exchange for giving up all people's decision making powers. Basically, it is a trade of people's birth right for the lentyl stew. As always with totalitarians, it all sounds good– you don't have to think, you don't have to make decisions abd bear responsibility for them, you just relax and pee in your diapers. The problem is– there is 100% guarantee it will slowly kill the country, the society, the civilization. In 19th century nascent elements of free market resulted in the fast growth of the wealth, the national pie, and since everybody is different, then everyone gets a different slice of the pie (due to their efforts or luck). The envy of the losers started rising, the tensions in the society too, with the evident risk of bloody attempts to redistribute the wealth. So, the smart statesman Otto von Bismarck hit 2 burds with 1 stone: he found the way both to calm down the tensions and to get free money for his government, using the Ponzi scheme of retirement. Bismarck calculated that a life expectancy was 64 years, so he used coercive powers of the government to usurp the retirement money. Before that people were putting aside THEIR money, they were investing in THEIR children, and when it's time to retire– they were using ONLY THEIR's money and THEIR's offspring for support during an old age. No government intervention in the retirement business was a win-win situation for the people, for the society as a whole, and the private charities took care of some rare exceptions that were truly unfortunate ones, (unlike the vast majority of those losers who just claim to be unfortunate), or just plain stupid not to save or invest in kids. Bismark imposed taxes to establish the government run retirement fund, promising to pay them back when they are 65 years old (a year after they were supposed to die), but the government as always has embezzled that free money right away. A lot of people died before that age, so the government didn't have to pay them back even with the shrank due to the common trends currency (for example, today's dollar worth about 5 cents of 1913 dollar, before the federal government started its un-Constitutional encroachment into people's rights). To those who lived "too long" to request THEIR MONEY BACK , the government instead of embezzled already money taxed the next generation to pay back to the retirees. This government-run pension fund is a win-win situation for the government, and, thus, lose-lose situation for the people. Whatever is good for government is bad for the people, and vice versa. People's and government's interests, powers and money are illustration to the law of communicating vessels: whatever comes to the government -is taken away from the people. Powerful government automatically means weak people, huge government budget comes from emptying of your pockets, and you would do much better job investing your money anywhere you wish than the government wasting your money any way it wants. The problems with this Ponzi scheme is the human nature that (just as an electrical current or water flow) follows the path of least resistance, which means they stop investing in their children essential part of their earnings. Before that coercive government intervention in the life of society the solution to aging was having 5–6 children as an old age security measure: some of the children would survive and be benevolent enough to feed their parents. Now with the government usurpation of the pension system children became a burden rather than a prudent investment. Yes, we do have a biological drive to have children, but this biological drive is easily satisfied by having 1 or 2 children. However, 1 or 2 children is nearly not enough to reproduce the society as a whole. Ensuing snow ball of the demographic catastrophe is exacerbated by the inevitable fiscal crisis as each consequent generation keeps shrinking, the less and less workers must pay to the usurped by the government pension fund, and the government again uses its coercive powers to impose heavier and heavier taxes. As higher the taxes are-as less incentives to work hard, so the efficiency of economics decreases, which accelerates the inevitable colapse and death of the society. So, growing totalitarianism of the Nanny State slowly kills the society and renders it defenseless against the jihadists colonizing Europe. Coming to Europe islamofascism will serve as a gravedigger for the dead-end of civilization, for the European Nanny State.
And that's exactly what Obama wants to do with America too: to turn America first into the "socialist paradise" populated by the helpless mindless zombies, and then into islamic hell; to turn it first into Greece and then into Sudan. He knows he can't sell this to the proud freedom-loving human beings such as Americans: first he must transform America into EuroZoo, populated by the clueless and helpless sheep. In his native Kenya Obama is openly pushing for the islamic Constitution because over there he doesn't have to conceal his true intentions, he doesn't have to lie as he does in America. Obama has spent millions of American taxpeyer dollars to push throuhg Islamic Constitution in Kenya (with only 12% of Muslims) and VP Biden promised “a flow of money” into Kenya when Kenyans give in to Obama’s demands. In Kenya Obama openly follows the footsteps of his father– black supremacist, islamic supremacist and the leftist: three totalitarian entities embodied in one.
2) Eurosocialism. All kinds of totalitarians in general and all kinds of socialists in particular share the same features: