Выбрать главу

Since I began this account Eptus and Podas have brought me the most fan­tas­tic news yet. I have to believe it because they should know what they are talk­ing about, and assure me that it is posi­tively a fact.

It seems that Podas collected locally a few speci­mens for exami­nation. Several of them were asym­metrical objects attached in some way to the ground. Another was of different type and showed some degree of symmetry. This latter was in the form of a soft cylinder, having a blunt pro­jec­tion at one end and a tapered one at the other, and was sup­ported by four further projections beneath.

It was by no means attached to the ground, being able to move itself with agility on the four lower pro­jec­tions. After examining them all care­fully Podas declares that they are all living objects, and that the basis in both types is carbon! Don't ask me how such a thing can be but Eptus supports him, so I have to accept it.

It has further occurred to them as a result of this dis­covery that if all life on this planet is on a carbon basis it may well account for the neglect of this excel­lent sili­cate region. It does not, how­ever, account for the imme­diate and unprovoked hos­tility of the in­habi­tants, which is a matter that interests me more at the moment.

Podas states that none of his speci­mens exhibited intelligence, though the cylin­drical object dis­played some clear reflexes to exter­nal stimuli.

I find it diffi­cult to imagine what a carbon-based intelli­gence could possibly look like but I expect we shall find out before long. I must admit that I look for­ward to this event not only with some mis­giving, but with a con­sider­able degree of dis­taste.

Report No. 2. All states and posi­tions: No change. Redoubt com­pleted. No con­firmed contact yet with intelli­gent forms.

Dear Zenn. Soon after the third rising of Sol enabled us to set the furnace-lenses to work again we pro­duced enough boltik to finish our redoubt. The last block was fused into place half­way through the diur­nal period, which is very short here. I am relieved that it has been com­pleted without inter­rup­tion. Now that we and our craft have this pro­tec­tion we can face the future with more confi­dence.

Podas and Eptus have examined more speci­mens. These confirm their earlier views but add little. So far we have not made contact with an intelli­gence here. After our earlier experiences we are not seek­ing it out but are wait­ing for it to come to us.

As a quali­fication I should add that Podas thinks we almost contacted an intelli­gence during the fourth Sol and still may do so. Eptus, how­ever, dis­agrees with him and on the face of it one would say Eptus was right. What hap-pened was this.

About the middle of the fourth Sol a cloud of dust was seem to the east of us above the long mark referred to in my last. It was soon evident that the creature res­ponsible for the dust was travelling along this mark to­wards us.

We observed it with increasing amaze­ment because it was clearly to be seen that this creature supported itself upon four disks. Its body was black and shining; at the front were metal appen­dages which shone like silver.

It moved at a moderate speed but clearly with dis­com­fort since its disk supports trans­mitted the result of every in­equality of the ground sur­face to its car­cass. Eptus deduces from this that it evolved upon some level sur­face, possibly ice, and is ill adapted to this district.

That its intention was hostile there could be no doubt for it projected strongly against us. Luckily it was either ill-informed regarding us or was not capable of serious attack, for it operated upon a quite harm­less range. Out of interest we let it come quite close before we turned the beam on it.

When we did we saw with astonish­ment — and I must admit some con­ster­nation — that noth­ing what­ever resulted. We watched it with growing anxiety as it came on, still keeping close to the line. Two more beams were turned on to it, still with­out effect.

Podas said, “I don't think it can be sentient. It is coming as if we weren't here at all.” And indeed it was.

In spite of our defences it conti­nued to come until, with­out slacken­ing speed in the least, it ran right into the side of the redoubt where the front of it was crushed and some pieces fell off.

We waited some moments, and then when it did not stir again, we left the redoubt to exa­mine it. It appeared to be a com­posite creature. One part had become detached and projected for­ward against the wall by the sudden stop.

This we found to bear a generic resem­blance to the cyl­inder spoken of in my last report but was unlike it in that it was covered with detach­able tegu­ments. Its forward blunt pro­jec­tion had encountered the side of the redoubt with some force. Possibly this was the cause of its de­ani­ma­tion.

Podas, investi­gating, found a smaller creature inside the body of the disked creature and un­attached to it. Possibly this is some singular form of par­turi­tion natural to this planet. I could not say. It is hard enough in this crazy place to hang on to one's reason, let alone try to apply it to the utterly un­reason­able.

Against the idea is the fact that neither of the smaller creatures showed any vestige of disks. Also both of these were covered in tegu­ments which can scarcely be natural — especially in the case of the latter creature, where the tegu­ment seemed designed with the purpose of hamp­ering the hinder limbs — though it may have some other purpose un-guessed.

The two creatures were brought into the redoubt for closer exami­nation. The parent or host — for Frinctus has put forward the theory that the two we have may be para­sitic upon it — creature was left out­side on account of its size.

More careful exami­nation showed that our two new specimens were not iden­tical though the differ­ences are of no great impor­tance. The short­ness of the fibres on the blunt pro­jec­tion of one com­pared with those on the other could easily be due to some kind of acci­dent, for instance.

Podas, who set about opening up the revoltingly squashy body of our first find with scien­tific lack of dis­gust that I can only envy, reports that its inter­nal arrange­ments, while quite in­com­pre­hen­sible to him, are on the same general lines as those of the small cylin­dri­cal creature referred to in my last.

Eptus is anxious to open the other for con­fir­ma­tion but Podas is against it. He says that we shall learn nothing more from it than from the other and that further­more it is not entirely inactive. It inflates and deflates in a most curious rhythmic manner which interests him. As it is Podas' depart­ment, the matter rests there for the moment.

Meanwhile, Orkiss, our chief mathe­ma­tician, who had out of curiosity been exam­in­ing the supposed parent creature out­side, returned to say that in his opinion it is not a creature at all but an arti­fact. Podas went back with Mm to look at it again and now concurs. Eptus reserves his opinion.

Podas has also tentatively suggested that our second specimen — the one with its nether limbs webbed by the odd tegu­ment — may possibly be the vessel for an intelligence of some sort, since it was inside the arti­fact. To his Eptus objects strongly.

How, he asks, can any form of intelli­gence recog­niz­able as such be expected from a sloppy collec­tion of in­num­er­able tubes slung on a hardened lime frame­work? Further, says he, reason pre­supposes at least the ability to compre­hend a straight line. This type of creature has not a straight line in its make-up.

It is pudgy and squashy and would be almost amor­phous but for its frame­work. Clearly it is not of a nature that could compre­hend a straight line — and if it cannot do that it follows that it can­not be capable of mathe­matical nor, there­fore, logical think­ing. Which, I must say, sounds to me a very reason­able argu­ment.