During the discussion between the sheriff and Dooley, the honorable Thurman Norton came out of the back room of the saloon and took a seat at his “bench,” which was the best table in the saloon. The table sat upon a raised platform which had been built just for that purpose. The saloon was the largest, most substantial building in Crystal, and the easiest place to empanel a jury, for it was always crowded. It was easy for the judge to round up twelve sober men, good and true. If it was sometimes difficult to find twelve sober men, the judge could stretch the definition of sobriety thin enough to meet the needs of the court. The “good and true,” however, had to be taken upon faith.
“You may be seated,” Judge Norton said.
There was a rustle of clothing and a scrape of chairs as the gallery, which consisted of nearly half the town, took their seats. Though respectable women rarely saw the inside of the saloon, many were present, for by court decree, at the moment, it was not a saloon, it was a courtroom. Out of deference to the ladies, the more objectionable artwork—meaning the nude paintings of women—had been covered.
“Is the prisoner present?”
“I’ve got the guilty son of a bitch right here, Judge,” the deputy sheriff said. His remarks generated laughter, and Judge Norton let it be known by the glare in his eyes that he did not appreciate it.
The saloon grew quiet.
“Is the accused represented by counsel?”
“I’m his lawyer, Your Honor,” a man sitting to the right of Cole Parnell said. The lawyer, who was short and chubby, was wearing a suit and cravat. “Daniel Gilman.”
“Is counsel for the state present?”
“I am, Your Honor. Michael Thomas.” The prosecutor was tall and thin, with a prominent Adam’s apple. Like Gilman, he was wearing a suit.
“Voir dire having been completed, are both counselors satisfied with the jury as it now sits?”
“I am, Your Honor,” Gilman said.
“As am I,” Thomas added.
“Very well, Mr. Prosecutor, you may make your case,” the judge said.
Thomas was so tall that as he stood, it looked like he was unfolding. He walked over to the side of the saloon where the twelve jurors sat. “Gentlemen of the jury, it is a simple case to present. There will be no need for flowery language or lengthy discourse. The simple truth will be all that is necessary to convict. This outlaw”—he pointed to Parnell—“and four of his cohorts robbed the bank. The money they took belonged to you, and to everyone else in this town who had their money on deposit, with the reasonable expectation that it would be safe.
“And, in robbing the bank, they committed murder, not once, but three times, cutting short the lives of Thaddeus Walker, Raleigh Jones, and Emerson Teasdale. Husbands and fathers, they were all good and upstanding citizens of our community. These three men committed no wrongdoing. They were merely in the bank, conducting business, when Cole Parnell and his partners in crime entered the bank and, in but the wink of an eye, dispatched the souls of all three to eternity.”
Thomas called as his witness the bank teller, whose name was Clyde Bailey. After the teller was sworn in, Thomas began to question him. “Tell the court, in your own words, what happened yesterday.”
“Four masked men came into the bank, all four holding guns,” Bailey said. “They made Mr. Walker, Mr. Jones, and Mr. Teasdale lie down on the floor, then they commenced to take all the money from my cashier’s drawer, then all the money from the safe. As they was leavin’, well, Mr. Walker, he shot at them. And that man”—Bailey pointed to Parnell—“turned and shot all three of them. Then they ran out of the bank.”
“Objection, Your Honor,” Gilman said. “If all four men were masked, how does he know which one did the shooting?”
“Sustained.”
“How much money did the robbers get?” Thomas asked his witness.
“They got nearly six thousand dollars.”
“Six thousand dollars? Is that the total amount of money in the bank?”
Bailey smiled. “No, sir. All the robbers did was clean out our daily working safe. They had no idea that we keep most of the money in a vault in the back of the bank.”
“I have no further questions of this witness,” Thomas said.
“Cross, Mr. Gilman?” the judge asked.
Gilman stood, but he didn’t approach the witness. “You said my client is the one who shot those three men, but the truth is, you don’t know who did the shooting, do you?”
“No sir, I guess not.”
“And if, as you say, all four men were masked, you can’t even testify, with certainty, that Mr. Parnell was one of those who entered the bank, can you?”
“When they was all ridin’ away, this fella’s horse was shot,” Bailey said. “And they captured him. That proves he was one of the ones in the bank.”
Gilman held up his hand. “You are conjecturing now. Listen carefully to my question. Can you testify, with certainty, that Mr. Parnell was one of the four in the bank?”
“Yes, sir. He was wearin’ the same clothes then he’s wearin’ now.”
“You mean his blue shirt?” Gilman turned toward the gallery. “Like the blue shirt Mr. Engle is wearing ?” He pointed to one of the men in the jury. “Or the blue shirt Mr. Puckett is wearing? Or the blue shirt Sheriff Dennis is wearing?”
A buzz went through the courtroom, for Gilman had pointed to three men who were wearing a shirt identical to the one being worn by the prisoner. “Should we consider any of those three men, suspects?”
“No,” the witness replied in a small voice.
“No further questions, Your Honor.”
“Redirect, Mr. Thomas?”
“No redirect, Your Honor.”
Thomas then called Frank Tanner, the man who shot the horse Parnell had been riding. Tanner testified that he had heard shots in the bank, and concerned, had grabbed a rifle, then went outside just in time to see the men exiting the bank, mount their horses, and ride away.
“Do you here testify that the man on trial is one of those who ran from the bank?” Thoams asked.
“Yes.”
“How can you be sure?”
“Because I had my eyes on him from the moment he left the bank, until I shot his horse.”
“No further questions.”
“Mr. Gilman?” the judge asked.
“Mr. Tanner, as they were leaving, did you have it in mind to kill the horse Parnell was riding?”
“No sir, I had it in mind to kill the bank robber, only I missed and hit his horse.”
“So, your eyesight isn’t all that good, is it? What I mean is, we are supposed to accept your story that you had Mr. Parnell in sight all along, but, with poor eyesight, you might have been wrong.”
“There ain’t nothin’ a-tall wrong with my eyesight,” Tanner replied, bristling at the question.
“No further questions, Your Honor.”
Thomas called two other witnesses who testified they had heard the shots and seen the men run from the bank. They also testified they had no doubt Parnell was one of the four. Thomas also said he could call a dozen more witnesses, but their testimony would be redundant as Parnell’s participation in the robbery had been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt.
Gilman had no witnesses for the defense, deciding it would not serve Parnell well to testify.
“Summation, Mr. Gilman,” Judge Norton said.
“Gentlemen of the jury, what we have here is circumstantial. Mr. Bailey was the only witness to the actual murder and robbery, and in his own words, all the perpetrators were masked. He claimed to identify my defendant by the fact that he is wearing a blue shirt. But that could have been any one of three men in here, including a member of the jury and the sheriff. Since he cannot, with certainty, place my client in the bank at the time of the robbery, it is absolutely impossible for him to say that Parnell is the one who shot the three customers. Remember, in our system of government, you have to know beyond the shadow of a doubt that someone is guilty, before you find for the prosecution.”