“Oh, then that explains the card,” she said.
“The card?”
“The unsigned card. ‘Oh, baby, oh, baby, oh, baby, thank you for last night and all the nights that came before.’ Remember?”
“I was joking about you going to the baseball game with me on such short notice,” I protested.
“Yeah, right. My oldest—who isn’t too thrilled that I divorced her father in the first place—signed for the flowers. She read the card. She wanted to know if it was a message from my lover.”
“What did you tell her?”
“I told her the truth. It was from a sick friend.”
“Did she believe you?”
“Only when I told her the sick friend’s name.”
I ignored the insult and insisted that I was only trying to be considerate.
“Since when?”
“It’s the new me. A man for the millennium: thoughtful, kind, selfless—”
“What do you want, Taylor?”
I held my thumb and forefinger in front of my eye and squinted through the quarter inch that separated them. “An itty, bitty favor.”
Anne tried to look stern, eventually failed. Like most true friends, we had long ago surrendered to each other’s faults and foibles; prolonged anger between us was impossible. She shook her head and smiled. It was a dazzling smile, rarely seen by anyone other than her children and, occasionally, a pal. A few months ago a photographer for a local magazine spent the better part of a morning attempting to coax that smile from her and couldn’t, so zealously does she guard it. It was just as well. The headline above the accompanying article read: ST. PAUL’S ANGEL OF DEATH. It was not an image Anne approved of.
Lieutenant Anne Scalasi was commander of the St. Paul Police Department’s Homicide Unit and therefore one of the most visible female law enforcement officers in the state of Minnesota. She rarely enjoyed the attention she received; press coverage of her divorce had infuriated her. Yet she loved the job. Many suggested—although they would not allow their names to be used in the article—that Anne’s promotion was merely a public-relations ploy by an affirmative-action-conscious police chief and mayor. I spent well over four years working in Homicide, nearly all that time as Annie’s partner, and I wholeheartedly disagreed. Anne Scalasi was the best cop I have ever known.
She began life as an elementary schoolteacher in Anoka, a fact the magazine found particularly ironic. Just for the giggles she decided to join the local Ride-Along program and went patrolling with Anoka County deputies. That was all it took. She was hooked. Anne quit teaching, got a job as a night dispatcher for a suburban police department that same week, and attended the police academy during the day. And she married a cop. After earning a law enforcement degree, she became the department’s first female officer and, later, its first female detective. Eventually she was recruited by the state attorney general’s office. That was a political appointment, and as soon as she realized it, Anne quit, taking a position with the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. The BCA liked her so much, they sent her to the FBI’s training center in Quantico, Virginia, where she was taught by the Behavioral Science Unit to investigate mass murders and serial rape killings. She scored first in her class. When she returned to the BCA, she requested that she be allowed to work with other law enforcement organizations that might require her expertise—which, of course, is why the agency was created in the first place. But the BCA began placing various bureaucratic restrictions on her, making her play second, third, and often fourth fiddle to their field agents. So she joined the St. Paul Police Department, which was happy to give her free rein.
I remember when she arrived. We gave her the cold shoulder, my colleagues and I, calling her “Miss Betty” behind her back—Miss Betty being the name of the woman who taught Romper Room on TV. One day she leaned across my desk, smiled her dazzling smile, and announced: “The more violently the face of a murder victim is battered, the more likely the killer and the victim had a close relationship.”
I told her I knew that.
“And now you know that I know it,” she told me. “I know a lot of other things, too. So, you want to catch bad guys with me or what?”
We caught a lot of them together.
“Do you know the Dakota County sheriff?” I now asked.
“Yes. Ed Teeters. Nice man.”
“Nice enough to let a PI snoop around one of his investigations?”
Anne gave me one of those here-we-go-again eye rolls and asked, “What are you into now?”
“Alison Donnerbauer Emerton,” I told her. “She disappeared seven months ago. I was just hired to learn what happened to her.”
“Good luck,” she said. “I worked the case …”
I don’t know why I was surprised. Solving unsolvable murders is, after all, Annie’s specialty.
“Teeters asked me if I could give him a fresh perspective. I couldn’t,” she admitted.
She opened a lower desk drawer and took out a huge family photo album—her murder book, a grisly, gory, gruesome account of every homicide investigation she had ever worked, the investigations presented in chronological order with the most recent in front. Each account contained before-and-after photographs of the victim, a detailed description of the killing, a synopsis of the investigation, and final disposition of the case. Homicides that were solved had a blue tab; those that remained unsolved had a red tab. There were only a few red tabs, and most of these were near the front. Anne turned to the tab labeled #197. Case #197 differed from the others in that it was skimpier and didn’t feature a photograph taken after the victim’s body was discovered. The “before” photograph was a reprint of the one Hunter Truman had given to me that morning.
“Theories?” I asked.
Anne shrugged. “Assailant knocks, Alison answers; assailant pushes a gun in her face, forces her into a car, drives off. I put a stopwatch on it. From the mouth of the cul-de-sac to the driveway to the front door, back to the car and out; add thirty seconds waiting for Alison to answer the door: one hundred and sixty-seven seconds total. And that’s conservative.”
“Who?”
Anne consulted her notes. “Raymond Fleck.”
“Based on what? The tape?”
“No, his MO. He was convicted of rape eight years ago; what he did was knock on the woman’s door in broad daylight. When she answered, he pointed a gun at her, shoved her in, raped her, left.”
“Does one conviction constitute an MO?”
“He was convicted for one, but the arresting officers figured him for a half dozen others they couldn’t get positive IDs on. Victims wouldn’t come forward.”
“Why take Alison with him?”
“The one time he was convicted, he stayed in the house for five hours. Made himself lunch between attacks. This time he didn’t have five hours to enjoy himself; the husband was on his way home.”
“If he did it for revenge, why not simply kill her and leave?”
“Where’s the sport in that?”
She had a point. Still, did she have anything that made it more than a theory?
“He’s free, isn’t he?”
“I asked a stupid question.” I admitted.
Anne studied Alison’s photograph for a moment and then closed the album with a resounding thud. “Teeters brought me in because he was looking for an angle his people might have missed. I could convince him to let you in for the same reason.”
“Would you?”
Anne pushed herself away from the desk. Her swivel chair was on wheels, and she rolled it slowly to a bank of beige-colored metal filing cabinets. From the third drawer of the middle cabinet Anne retrieved a file maybe three inches thick, the pages held together with a metal fastener. The label on the file cover listed Alison’s name and the date of her disappearance. Anne dropped the file in front of me and started rummaging through the bottom right-hand drawer of her desk. She came up with a brown grocery bag and slipped the file into it, but not before I peeked under the cover and read the first page: Case #97-050819 Dakota County Sheriff’s Department Alison Donnerbauer Emerton TABLE OF CONTENTS FELONY MURDER. The word COPY had been stamped in red several times across the page.