Ekman, P. (1988). Lying and nonverbal behavior: theoretical issues and new findings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12,163–116.
Ekman, P. (1989). Why lies fail and what behaviors betray a lie. In J. С Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 11–82.
Ekman, P. (1992). Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York: W. W Norton.
Ekman, P. (1993). Why don't we catch liars? Social Research, 63,801–811.
Ekman, P. (1991). Deception, lying, and demeanor. In D. F. Halpern & A. E. Vois-kounsky (Eds), States of mind: American and post-soviet perspectives on contemporary issues in psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 93-105.
Ekman, P. & Frank, M. G. (1993). Lies that fail. In M. Lewis & С Saarni (Eds), Lying and deception in everyday life. New York: Guilford Press, 184–201.
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32,88-106.
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1912). Hand movements.yoMraa/ of Communication, 22, 353–314.
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1914). Detecting deception from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 288–298.
Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1982). Felt, false and miserable smiles. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 238–253.
Ekman, P. & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913–920.
Ekman, P., Davidson, R.J. & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: emotional expression and brain physiology. II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58,342–353.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V. & O'Sullivan, M. (1988). Smiles when lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 414–420.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Scherer, K.R. (1916). Body movement and voice pitch in deceptive interaction. Semiotica, 16, 23–21.
Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., Friesen, W. V. & Scherer, K. (1991). Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 125–135.
Elaad, E. (1990). Detection of guilty knowledge in real-life criminal investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 15, 521–529.
Elaad, E. (1993). Detection of deception: a transactional analysis perspective./owma/ of Psychology, 121,5-15.
Elaad, E. (1991). Polygraph examiner awareness of crime-relevant information and the guiltyknowledge test. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 101–120.
Elaad, E. & Ben-Shakhar, B. (1991). Effects of item repetitions and variations on the efficiency of the guilty knowledge test. Psychophysiology, 34, 581–596.
Elaad, E., Ginton, A. & Jungman, N. (1992). Detection measures in real-life criminal guilty knowledge tests.Journal of Applied Psychology, 11, 151–161.
Elaad, E., Ginton, A. & Shakhar, G. (1994). The effects of prior expectations and outcome knowledge on polygraph examiners' decisions.Journal of Behavioral Decision-Making, 7, 219–292.
Esplin, PW, Boychuk, T & Raskin, D.C. (1988). Afield validity study of Criteria-Based Content Analysis of children's statements in sexual abuse cases. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Credibility Assessment in Maratea, Italy, June 1988.
Exline, R., Thibaut,J., Rickey, C. & Gumpert, P. (1910). Visual interaction in relation to machiavellianism and an unethical act. In P. Christie & F. Geis (Eds), Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press, 53–15.
Eysenck, H.J. (1984). Crime and personality. In D.J. Muller, D. E. Blackman & A. J. Chapman (Eds), Psychology and law. New York: John Wiley, 85-100.
Faigman, D. L., Kaye, D., Saks, M. J. & Sanders, J. (1991). Modem scientific evidence: the law and science of expert testimony. St Paul, MN: West.
Farwell, L. A. & Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will come out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 28,531–541.
Feeley, Т. H. & deTurck, M. A. (1991). Perceptions of communication as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer: the case of lie detection. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 1991.
Feeley, Т. H. & deTurck, M. A. (1998). The behavioral correlates of sanctioned and unsanctioned deceptive communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22,189–204.
Feeley, T. H. & Young, M.J. (1991). Detecting deceptive communication: a narrative review. Unpublished manuscript.
Feeley, T. H., deTurck, M. A. & Young, M.J. (1995). Baseline familiarity in lie detection. Communication Research Reports, 12,160–169.
Feldman, R. S., Jenkins, L. & Popoola, O. (1919). Detection of deception in adults and children via facial expressions. Child Development, 50, 350–355.
Fiedler, K. & Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20,199–223.
Fisher, R. P. & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: the cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Flavell, J. FL, Botkin, P. T, Fry, С. K., Wright,J. С &Jarvis, P. T. (1968). The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: John Wiley.
Foley, M.A. & Johnson, M.K. (1985). Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions: a developmental comparison. Child Development, 56,1145–1155.
Ford, Ch. V. (1995). Lies! Lies!! Lies.!! The psychology of deceit. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Frank, M.G. & Ekman, P. (1991). The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 1429–1439.
Freedman, J. L. Adam, E. K., Davey, S. A. & Koegl, C.J. (1996). The impact of a statement: more detail does not always help. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1, 111–130.
Freud, S. (1959). Collected papers. New York: Basic Books.
Fugita, S. S., Wexley, K. N. & Hillery, J. M. (1914). Black-white differences in nonverbal behavior in an interview setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4,343–351.
Furedy, J.J. (1991a). Alice in Wonderland terminological usage in, and communicational concerns about, that peculiar flight of technological fancy: the CQT polygraph. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 241–241.
Furedy, J.J. (1991b). On the validity of the polygraph. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 211–213.
Furedy, J. J. (1993). The «control» question «test» (CQT) polygrapher's dilemma: logico-ethical considerations for psychophysiological practitioners and researchers..International Journal ofPsychophysiology, 15, 263–261.
Furedy, J. J. (1996a). Some elementary distinctions among, and comments concerning, the «control» question «test» (CQT) polygrapher's many problems: a reply to Honts, Kircher and Raskin. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 22, 53–59.
Furedy, J. J. (1996b). The North American polygraph and psychophysiology: disinterested, uninterested, and interested perspectives. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 91-105.
Furedy, J. J. & Heslegrave, R.J. (1988). Validity of the lie detector: a psychophysiological perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 219–246.
Gale, A. (1988). The polygraph test, more than scientific investigation. In A. Gale (Ed.), The polygraph test: lies, truth and science. London: Sage, 1–9.
Garratt, G. A., Baxter, J. C. & Rozelle, R. M. (1981). Training university police in black-American nonverbal behavior.Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 211–229.
Garrido, E., Masip, J., Herrero, C., Tabernero, С & Vega, M.T. (1998). Policemen's ability to discern truth from deception. Unpublished manuscript.
Ginton, A., Daie, N., Elaad, E. & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1982). A method for evaluating the use of the polygraph in a real-life situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61,131–131.
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Doubleday.