Выбрать главу

that

he

was

extremely

skeptical

that

Bitcoin would ever amount to

anything real. Dimon said

that once Bitcoin companies

had to follow the same rules

as banks, when it comes to

money

laundering

and

compliance,

“that

will

probably be the end of them.”

Barry

Silbert

knew

Dimon personally. When he

saw

Dimon’s

comments

about Bitcoin, he quickly e-

mailed Dimon a link to the

pro-Bitcoin essay that Marc

Andreessen had written in the

New York Times. A few days

later, Dimon called Silbert.

Dimon had clearly read

Andreessen’s

essay

and

sympathized with the view

that virtual currencies could

provide some opportunity for

people outside the United

States who didn’t have access

to good banks.

But Dimon responded that

the potential of Bitcoin was

not going to be enough to

convince

government

officials to allow a competing

currency to exist. Dimon

knew what it was like to work

in an industry that came

under

government

supervision. Once Bitcoin

came

under

similar

regulation, it would require

all the same fees and rules

that bothered people in the

traditional financial system.

He didn’t dismiss Barry’s

arguments,

though,

and

invited him to come in and

present Bitcoin to some of

JPMorgan

Chase’s

executives.

Dimon’s perspective was

representative of a broader

shift in the banking industry’s

mind-set since the financial

crisis. Before the mortgage

meltdown had nearly brought

down the American economy,

Wall Street had hired some of

the best young minds in the

world and tasked them with

finding innovative ways to

make money. When many of

those

clever

innovations

ended up contributing to the

economic collapse, the banks

that survived were made

keenly

aware

of

how

financial

experimentation

could go awry. What’s more,

regulators put in place a raft

of new rules that forced banks

to think twice before taking

unnecessary risks. Just as

important,

government

officials were forcing banks

to pay billions of dollars in

fines for past infractions. Few

banks

paid

as

high

a

monetary price as JPMorgan.

By the time Dimon and

Silbert

talked,

the

most

important characteristic of

any

new

business

for

JPMorgan was not how much

money it would make, but

how it would sit with

regulators. JPMorgan had

gone further than most in

pulling back from potentially

risky activity. During 2013 it

had stopped working with

remittance companies, check

cashers, and even student-

loan providers, not because it

had to, but because it didn’t

want the headache. Other

banks were taking similar, if

less aggressive, steps.

As the comments at

Lawsky’s hearing suggested,

this was nearly the opposite

of the attitude in Silicon

Valley, which had not been

implicated in the financial

crisis. The tech industry was

increasingly confident about

its own ability to change the

world, emboldened by the

success of companies like

Apple,

Google,

and

Facebook. Some of the most

popular tech companies were

ones such as Airbnb and Uber

that

openly

challenged

cumbersome regulations like

those imposed on hotels and

taxis.

In

the

financial

networks that Bitcoin was

hoping to challenge, tech

investors like Fred Wilson

saw just another set of

regulations that could be

disrupted to create a more

efficient market. If anything,

the financial industry seemed

even more open to disruption

because

the

incumbent

businesses were so afraid of

breaking the rules.

Wences, who had been

working at the intersection of

technology and finance for

two decades, acknowledged

that for most of his career the

center of power and wealth in

the

United

States,

and

perhaps even the world, had

been the financial industry

and, specifically, New York.

But he was outspoken in his

belief that this was about to

change.

“It’s likely that the next

twenty or thirty years are

going to be the same for

Silicon Valley,” he liked to

say. “In no other area are we

going to see the passing of

the baton so clearly as with

Bitcoin.”

The only problem for the

Silicon Valley disrupters was

that they still relied on banks

to hold the dollars they used

to pay their employees—and,

in the case of Bitcoin

companies, the dollars they

received from customers to

pay for the virtual currency.

Wences

Casares

had

always used JPMorgan Chase

as the bank for his previous

startups—he had maintained

an allegiance to the bank after

it had given his first startup

an account back in the 1990s.

Now, though, when Wences

applied to JPMorgan to open

an account for his new

company, Xapo, he was, for

the first time, turned down.

He found another bank that

initially opened a corporate

account for Xapo, but then

shut it down right before

Wences

received

a

$10

million check from his new

investors, the venture-capital

firm Benchmark. Wences was

in the unusual position of

having an enormous check

and no one willing to accept

it. He was eventually saved

by Silicon Valley Bank, the

same bank that was holding

money for Coinbase and the

only

bank

showing

any

willingness to work with

Bitcoin companies.

In the long run, though,

Wences assured everyone he

knew that the cautiousness of

the banks would matter less

and less. At an event hosted

by JPMorgan in the Valley, to

discuss Bitcoin, Wences was

dismissive when the topic of

Jamie Dimon came up:

“I think whatever Jamie

does or doesn’t do will be as

relevant

as

what

the

postmaster general did or

didn’t do about e-mail.”

CHAPTER 29

February 2014

Mark

Karpeles

was

spending many of his days in

early 2014 in a space on the

ground floor of the Tokyo

office building that housed

Mt. Gox. Mark was turning

the space into what he called

the Bitcoin Café, a real-world

showcase for Bitcoin in