There is, however, an even more serious matter — Islamist infiltration, militancy and radicalism within the statal apparatus and its machinery, spread by naturalised immigrants of Maghrebian or black origin now present everywhere: in central or local administrations, the police, the army, hospitals, etc. The very same process is underway in the associational world. What this means is that administrations display a preference for people of immigrant origin. Indeed, our rulers have made their choice of enemy; that much is absolutely clear.
Due to its ideological and militantly political partiality, and in the name of those same famous ‘Human Rights’, our justice system, including its highest authorities, acts as an essential link in the current immigrational chain of invasion afflicting France and Europe, particularly because it makes it impossible for us to repatriate immigrants whose very presence on our soil is illegal. When one considers the European Court of Human Rights and, in France, the Constitutional Council, the Council of State and the Court of Cassation, all of which are non-elected bodies belonging to an elite that has been co-opted under rather opaque conditions, one realises that they are the main agents of the Africanisation of our country and its transformation into a giant shantytown.
In early July 2018, the Constitutional Council pronounced a staggering judgement that violated our laws and legal order in the name of ‘morality’ (i.e. humanism and fraternity — always the same razzle-dazzle): it prohibited the prosecution of all those who would help immigrants settle illegally in France. This contributes to the strengthening of the illegal-immigrant suction pump. This decision follows an initial catastrophic measure taken previously, one that has led us not to regard the presence of illegals on our territory as an actual crime…
Oblivious to political correctness, demographer Michèle Tribalat has determined that, as a result of an astonishing sort of legal difficulty and a sophisticated humanitarian ideology, the overwhelming majority of rejected asylum seekers are not expelled, simply because of the obstacles erected by the justice system itself. In the name of humanism, the latter thus fosters the invasion of our territory, which burdens all budgets with huge costs and goes against the will of our indigenous people. Not only is this approach anti-democratic, but also — and above all — irresponsible.
Resorting to double standards, our justice system shows great leniency not towards our natives, but towards extra-European offenders, who, in fact, are well aware of the situation and take full advantage of it. By constantly interfering in the decisions of the executive authorities, its role also consists in neutralising judicial repression and punishments. Consequently, our law enforcement and judicial police are left with little to do.
In addition to the prohibition to drive illegal migrants back to sea and the obligation to welcome them, in a historically unique case of anti-defensive measures imposed by European judges whose legal interpretations and implementations are above any elected parliament, every constitution and all democratic consultation, the judicial authorities have also vindicated the smugglers and traffickers of illegal migrants (thugs and criminals, as confirmed by the facts), who enjoy the complicity of various NGOs. All of this is accomplished in utter tranquillity, all in the name of humanism.
By systematically passing very mild and moderate judgments, or not handing out any punishment at all in the case of morally irredeemable foreign thugs, not only do judges encourage them to continue, but they also promote new activities. Let us add that in the face of Islamic demands, a very disturbing yet concealed phenomenon can be observed within the French justice system, one that we experienced under the Occupation that lasted from 1940 to 1944. This phenomenon is known as Collaboration. I emphasise its importance and will come back to it at length further on.
Whenever I state that the elites of France are working to destroy the white race, the same fact is often brought to my attention. The argument is the following one: why would they want white people to disappear, when most politicians, influencers and TV stars are also European by blood? From a distance, this may indeed seem strange and illogical.
First of all, the fact that the members of this elite are white or proclaim themselves as such is debatable, especially since La République en Marche[62] and the childlike Emmanuel Macron assumed power. For a significant number of men and women of Asian or African origin (Maghrebian, black) are now part of the French National Assembly. Furthermore, we must not forget the immigrant politicians of France Insoumise,[63] with the stupid and noisy Danièle Obono[64] at the forefront (one must admit that a pun on her name is very tempting indeed). All of this does not exude much of our eternal France…
It must also be said that in both rightist and leftist parties, though admittedly far more often in the leftist spectrum, one encounters Jewish MPs, ministers, general councillors and mayors who, for the most part, define themselves as ‘citizens of the world’ or quite simply as Jewish rather than French. This is a rather unpleasant fact, since the nation they are supposed to serve and love with a patriotic heart is actually our own. Our country, our people. Consider the lousy Bernard-Henri Levy[65] and some of his notorious misbehaviour and decide for yourselves if these anti-white elites are (or feel) part of the great European civilisation. When this nutcase tells us that he supported the 2011 Libyan war and that he had, ‘as a Jew, become involved’ in the intellectual debate to convince the French people of the merits of this foreign conflict (for which we are still paying the price), there is truly something for us to seriously ponder. I am not hostile to Zionist policies and the Zionist idea itself, which are necessary for the survival of the Jewish people, but as soon as the fate of Israel becomes more important than that of France in the words of the journalists, thinkers and politicians that are supposed to represent and defend our country, the result is a serious conflict of interest, one that I cannot fail to highlight.
In my opinion, however, there is yet another reason or, at the very least, a purpose that accounts for the insane project that the oligarchy obstinately pursues, without ever consulting us about it. The great humanist and anti-racist declarations and various apologetic arguments supporting our so-called living-together, which were particularly bombarded with during the July 2018 football world cup and which revolved around an absolutely ‘exemplary’ national team comprising players who, in 90% of all cases, were of foreign origin, all emanate from a very specific environment.
The very simple sociological question that must be asked — since sociology tends to be interested in facts rather than ideas — is the following: who are these journalists, intellectuals, and political/mediatic actors, all of whom vote for Macron, our archetypally xenophilic and cosmopolitan president? Who are the members of this mediatic, governmental and judicial elite, whose members are responsible for such unbearable finger-pointing? Where do they live? Where does one go looking for them?
The only real coloured people they encounter on a daily basis are usually their own housekeepers. They lecture their fellow citizens about anti-racism, tolerance and living-together when it is the latter who suffer as a result of this forced and demanding — to say the least — cohabitation with populations of immigrant origin. They themselves, on the other hand, live, work and move about in completely unspoilt areas and spend their time in VIP environments that are protected against any and all allogeneic presence. They talk about this presence without having ever experienced it, and never enrol their offspring in public schools. They do not apply to themselves the cohabitation imposed by the SRU[66] laws, which they themselves have approved. The basic truth is that they do not abide by two-thirds of what they seemingly believe in. Their sermon-like speeches, tainted with both ignorance and hypocrisy, are worthless in our eyes.
62
TN:
63
TN: Generally translated as ‘Unbowed France’, ‘Unsubmissive France’, or ‘Untamed France’,
64
TN: Born on 12th July, 1980, Danièle Obono is a French politician of Gabonese origin representing
65
TN: Born on 5th November, 1948, Bernard-Henri Lévy (known in France as BHL) is a French public intellectual, media personality and author. Influenced by Karl Marx and Jean-Paul Sartre among others, he was one of the leaders of the ‘
66
TN: The SRU (French: