Social networks have contributed significantly to aggravating such insurrectional phenomena by amplifying them through the establishment of instant communication and the spreading of rumours that reinforce mobilisation and thus also violent actions.
On the other side of the spectrum, the reactions are weakened by the relentless presence of political correctness. ‘Let us be open to Others and welcome those nice invaders’ — this is precisely what the pathological prevailing ideology demands we do, when we are actually the ones being victimised by racism and hatred. But will this ideology’s efforts always be crowned with success?
Since 2016, the increase in individual attacks involving bladed weapons, which are always carried out by Muslims of non-European origin against native Frenchmen and French women (mostly to cries of allahu akbar!), has indeed been synonymous with murderous and racist hostility, serving, above all, to highlight the fact that an ethnic and religious civil war, so to speak, or what they themselves term the ‘Great Evening’, is brewing in their exhilarated minds.
The increasing violence that afflicts our schools, an unheard-of phenomenon in most other countries of the Western world resulting entirely from the actions of young people of Afro-Arab origin, is also the harbinger of our society’s deep-seated splintering.
In 2017, a total of 442 violent incidents occurred on a daily basis in French schools or right outside their premises, with 30% of them involving physical violence and 3% the actual use of weapons. Those who perpetrated these acts were, in 95% of all cases, of Arab and African descent, a figure that one can verify by going through the press and checking the surnames of those responsible for these aggressions (provided that they are revealed, of course). Could this ever be chalked up to mere coincidence?
According to the French Ministry of the Interior, 27% of those that were accused of committing acts of sexual violence in 2017 were minors, which is a considerable percentage. When it comes to violent offences as a whole, underaged perpetrators represent as much as one third. And what is extremely worrying is that 10% were less than thirteen years old. There has also been an increase in the number of delinquent and violent girls. I suppose there is no need for me to specify their origins, is there?
These offenders are no longer afraid of the police and thus proceed to provoke and challenge them, knowing perfectly well, and in advance, that our justice system’s hands are bound by the ‘humanistic’ ideology and laws guaranteeing the impunity of minors and could never impose any real punishment upon them.
What official statistics are forbidden to disclose, but many police officers reveal when venting their emotions in the alternative media or off the record, is that the vast majority of juvenile offenders are of Maghrebian or, to a lesser extent, black sub-Saharan origin. We suspected as much. Zemmour’s famous sentence regarding those ‘prisons filled with Blacks and Arabs’ makes perfect sense here… He was right all along.
As far as the issue of migrational invasion and Islamic radicalisation is concerned, the governmental elites, the French (in)justice system and the European Union have all been afflicted with a morbid sort of xenophilia supported by Pope Francis and thus target public opinions with supreme contempt — public opinions that never have any say in the matter and are increasingly infuriated by being forced to tolerate the invasion of their lands in the name of this famed ‘democracy’ and painfully humanitarian, intellectualist and moralising rhetoric, both of which practise deceit paired with a denial of reality (all in accordance with the following surrealistic dogma: ‘There is no migrational flooding taking place, and we must avoid arousing people’s fears’).
As witnessed in Italy, Hungary, Poland and Austria, where the rebellion of the population brought anti-immigration governments to power (all of which are expected to act in an assertive fashion), white people are less willing to be pushed around and are thus more and more tempted to embrace the horrid populism hated by falsely democratic elites. This heralds the fact that, far from being apathetic and counting on the police to respond (ever so weakly), the indigenous lower classes shall indeed descend into the streets should a civil war break out. Some of them, at least. As a result of this, the intensity and severity of the clashes will only find itself increased, a prospect that fills our humanist leaders’ hearts with horror and those of their police forces with fear, as they all now stand to attention. As Ivan Rioufol remarks:
The fundamentalists of Human Rights remain insensitive to the right to preserve one’s own homeland. Just like UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, they persist in their belief that such migration is both “inevitable” and “necessary”. … The very idea of expecting Macron and Merkel to take action and resolve the migrational issue is equivalent to asking two arsonists to bring under control the fires that they themselves have lit. … From the state’s perspective, the threat lies not in immigration and totalitarian Islam, but in the awakening of nations. Such blindness acts as a source of complicity. (Le Figaro, 22nd June, 2018)
Resorting to scornfully ‘chic’ and foul upper-bourgeois political cant and armoured with endless layers of brass,[73] Emmanuel Macron has remained utterly insensitive to what people experience and think. Disconnected from reality and living on a cloud of absolute privilege that allows him to enjoy the protection bestowed upon him by his wife/mother, he spoke most insultingly of ‘populist leprosy’ by mocking our ‘national withdrawal’ in harmony with the principles of doublespeak, as if having our own identity were confining and shameful. He set out to meet Pope Francis in the Vatican and seek the latter’s moral endorsement of his hypocritical humanism centred around the welcoming of migrants. The insignificant Benjamin Griveaux, who was appointed to act as our government’s spokesperson in 2017, called for ‘European solidarity against populism’.
According to what this brainwashed blabbermouth — who has attained the rank of minister and proceeds to repeat the catechism of the dominant ideology — has let slip, it is not the migrational invasion and Islam that are our enemies, but populisms, i.e. the abominable defensive reactions of low-class Europeans, who are particularly infuriated by the permanent delinquency they encounter. That is where our main foe is allegedly found. They can’t be serious!
As for the European Union, this sickly and deceitful old lady that indulges in moralistic sermons in an effort to prevent any conflict, it is now on its last legs, a good idea that has succumbed to failure and misdirection. It deserves to be buried in its own, private vault in the cemetery of Brussels (an invaded city if ever there was one). It should be noted, however, that although it has been a while since England decided to set its Brexit withdrawal in motion, the measures do not seem to have much of a positive impact on its migration policy in terms of reducing the number of extra-European arrivals.
Since 2015, a year that marked the arrival of thousands of illegal invasion waves comprising fake refugees from sub-Saharan Africa, North Africa as well as the Middle East, the north-east of Paris has been plagued by an ever-growing spate of harassment, assault and rape targeting (mostly white and unveiled) women in public places. In some neighbourhoods of Paris and its suburbs, it is becoming increasingly risky, if not impossible, for a woman to move about in public. In 95% of all cases, the aggressors are either black Africans or Arabs, which, I must stress, is a sociological fact and not an ideological remark.
73
TN: The word ‘brass’ is to be understood both in the traditional sense of the word and the meaning which the author intended and that I have faithfully rendered —