His electoral bastion is located in Trappes, one of the most Islamised cities in France and one of those that have been most affected by immigration settlement: nicknamed the ‘French Molenbeek’, 70% of its inhabitants are Muslim. Hamon is in his element there. Led by Marwan Muhammad and pervaded by Salafists of the worst kind, the CCIF maintains objectively close ties to radicalism and implicitly justifies terrorism, while simultaneously enjoying the support of both Hamon and his friends. The latter have also been associating with evidently anti-Zionist Qatar, whose motivations remain very unclear, and are campaigning for the recognition of a Palestinian state. Hamon has even chosen to support the wearing of burkinis on French beaches. Similarly, he defends the classic Islamo-leftist position formulated by Islam-worshipping scoundrel Edwy Plenel according to which secularism — nowadays incorrectly termed ‘secularity’ — is alleged to have discriminating, Islamophobic and even racist undertones, a view that has been borrowed from the American Left. What follows are a few cunning xenophilic thoughts expressed by Benoît Hamon, all in political cant, of course; they are all gems of our collaborationist ideology that may well be the focus of endless propaganda at the start of a future civil war: ‘How far will we go in our stigmatisation of French Muslims the moment they show that they belong to a certain religion?’ Considering the municipal bylaws that ban the wearing of burkinis ‘absurd’, he added: ‘There is no connection between jihadism and the burkini. If a woman decides to wear it, well, under the 1905 French law, she is free to do so’. The problem, however, is that she is mostly not the one to actually make this decision. Uttering these words as a leitmotiv wherever he goes, Hamon denounces ‘a secularism used as a sword against one single religion — Islam. Let us stop turning Islam into a problem burdening our Republic!’ How many deaths does it take for it become a problem, I wonder? Hamon should simply convert to Islam — for the sake of consistency.
During both the presidential campaign and his legislative campaigns in the constituency of Trappes, people often whispered: ‘Hamon is the candidate of the Muslim Brotherhood’ — which is probably true. But one day, the Muslim Brotherhood and other Salafist affiliates will no longer require the services of such French collaborators, because they will have their own Arab candidates running in all elections.
The leftist media, and especially Libération, have endorsed the programme of Islam-loving, pro-immigration and xenophilic Benoît Hamon, in an attitude that sometimes borders on caricature. Completely indifferent to our indigenous people, Hamon is a staunch supporter of the Great Replacement. What motivates him is not so much the ordinary anti-racism preached by the vulgate as a specifically anti-white type of racism, which is one of his pet causes and drives him to talk utter nonsense and express suicidal ideas that still manage to make good headway: ‘Migrants? We can welcome more of those’; or this one: ‘The work done by refugees allows us to earn money’. An insane demagogue, he suggests that we pay out ‘integration allowances’, even in the case of undocumented migrants, and that we create ‘humanitarian visas’ and grant migrants, without distinction, a ‘right to work’ which even our own unemployed Frenchmen are not going to be granted. We must not, of course, forget the great classics, the favourite topics of the imbecilic Left which the latter has been rambling on about for decades: the right of foreigners to vote in local elections AND the legalisation of cannabis. What the idiot Hamon fails to realise is that he is setting his own friends against him: indeed, Islam strongly condemns any sale of alcohol or cannabis. And what is more, his Brown-Black dealer friends would definitely be annoyed if the cannabis trade were legalised…
Last but not least, Hamon intends to resume the pro-thug Taubira[96] reforms and strengthen them, by abolishing, for instance, all forms of imprisonment impacting ‘young people’, and creating an ‘anti-discrimination brigade’ that would target both racist and sexist discrimination and keep a close eye on all public and private practices, in accordance with a totalitarian tropism that is specific to the Left. Here is a problem for them to ponder, though: what exactly should one do if, in a Muslim family, one notices the presence of sexist discrimination against women (which is the case, generally speaking)?
Just like among Muslims themselves, one also encounters model cases of crass stupidity and absurd deception imprinted with bullet-proof bad faith among the French and non-Muslim supporters of Islamophilia.
There is a delusional conception of feminism that considers the wearing of the veil as a sign of ‘freedom’ for women. Rokhaya Diallo, ‘an intersectional and anti-colonial feminist’, advocates the wearing of the veil. Never mind the fact that it has, for centuries on end, served as a macho instrument for the derogation, relegation and oppression of women. In France, neighbouring countries and such distant places as Canada, it is now perceived as an identity marker indicating territorial occupation. The increasing number of veiled women in our public spaces is meant to imply the following to our native French people: you have been invaded, now step back!
On this very same wavelength, we have Sihame Assbague, who organises the famous ‘anticolonial summer camps’ that are off-limits to Whites, and the collaborationist Caroline de Haas, the former campaign director of Cécile Duflot,[97] who was scandalised by the ‘racist’ tendency to connect the sexual assault that took place on New Year’s Eve in Cologne with the massive presence of Arab migrants kindly welcomed by Mutti Merkel. Immigrants? Of course not! The perpetrators were all aliens, don’t you know that?
Libération, which is run by Islamolatrist Laurent Joffrin and is very open to Islamo-leftism, shares Mediapart’s endorsement of the Islamic veil in all its shapes and forms (including the burkini) in the name of a ‘new feminism’ that rejects all prohibition. Seriously, how stupid can you get…[98]
The perverse and fanatical association known as LALLAB, which enjoys the militant support of Libération, advocates the wearing of the Islamic veil and — hold on to your hats! — the ‘right of women to be veiled’. As if they had a choice in their own families and within the religious framework that smothers them. As might be expected, some big names of the Islamosphere, all of whom are native Frenchmen like you and me, petitioned in favour of this rather peculiar association, recommending that women wear the veil — they included Benoît Hamon, the friend of the Palestinians; Pascal Boniface; and Jean-Louis Bianco, a major figure of the gauche caviar…[99] The Left is not what it used to be, is it.
Another exquisite thought worth mentioning was expressed by Danièle Obono, the Parisian MP of France Insoumise, who explains that a Muslim bus driver who refuses to take the wheel of a bus that had previously been driven by a woman is not necessarily ‘radicalised’ but perhaps merely ‘sexist’. Jeannette Bougrab (the girlfriend of Charb, the cartoonist who was assassinated at Charlie Hebdo for having drawn caricatures of the prophet Muhammad…) comments: ‘She is the useful idiot, not to say the accomplice of the Islamists’. Let us also enjoy the thoughts of Idriss Sihamedi (Baraka City), who declared: ‘I think music can be dangerous, polygamy an alternative to adultery, and the veil a sign of modesty. Am I crazy to think so?’ Not necessarily crazy, no; but definitely an idiot.
96
TN: Born on 2nd February, 1952 in Cayenne, French Guiana, Christiane Taubira acted as the French Minister of Justice in the Ayrault government. Her reforms and positions sparked a great deal of controversy, especially when it comes to gay marriage and the rights of terrorists and criminals.
97
TN: A former politician, Cécile Duflot is currently part of Oxfam, a confederation of twenty independent charitable organisations striving to ‘alleviate of global poverty’.
98
AN: What few are aware of is that when the first veiled girls appeared in the Parisian region back in the early 1980s, they caused great controversy in circles with close ties to feminism, whose members rightly perceived the veil as an expression of women’s oppression. Anticipating the quibbles of today’s Islamo-leftists, the first to defend these veiled women was an intellectual considered to be part of the ‘far Right’ — Alain de Benoist. De Benoist published a dithyrambic and fanatical opinion column in
99
TN: