Our police and gendarmerie, whose normal role is to guarantee public security, have reached the end of their rope and are on the verge of collapse. A June 2018 senatorial commission of inquiry — whose reporter was François Grosdidier (Les Républicains) — investigated this dramatic situation, a situation which contributes to the equation of a very likely ethnic civil war. Why? Demoralised, constantly assaulted by the same people, and harbouring the feeling of having been more or less abandoned by our political powers and especially by a judicial authority that is both cowardly and overwhelmed, the police, now deprived of resources and exasperatingly paralysed by gangster-protecting administrative procedures, could end up embracing an attitude of insubordination and joining, in an improvised and dissident manner, the ranks of a potential popular resistance.
A good example is that of the Magnanville effect. Magnanville is a town where, in June 2016, a police couple were brutally murdered in their own house and in front of their child by a Muslim Arab jihadist. This barbaric assassination takes on the symbolic meaning of a declaration of war, one that is obviously both ethnic and racist in nature. After the murders, the Islamist proceeded to create a video list of mediatic personalities that were to be killed in the name of allah!
Not only do many policemen and gendarmes have to contend with the struggle against Muslim terrorism (who could forget the January 2015 assassination of Ahmed Merabet, a Parisian peacekeeper killed by the perpetrators of the Charlie Hebdo murders, the Kouachi brothers, simply because he represented the archetypal Arab traitor serving the interests of white Frenchmen?), but they are also subjected to a protean violence at the hands of Afro-Maghrebian youths supported by leftist militias. During riots, anti-police hatred is often expressed through the use of live ammunition and, as part of a very serious and worsening development, through sanguinary attacks carried out on plain-clothed police officers either in their own homes or in the street. A few days before the first round of the 2017 presidential elections, another policeman was fatally shot in the head on the Avenue des Champs Elysees!
Despite the (modest) efforts made by our Ministry of the Interior and its technocrats, especially on a budgetary level, the responses to the demoralisation and consequent demobilisation of our police forces have been utterly inadequate, especially since the latter are exacerbated by a ridiculous sense of helplessness and futility in the face of a judicial laxity that barely punishes, protects and even releases (!) those thugs, aggressors and troublemakers. Feeling humiliated by the public authorities but supported by our native people, a part of our police could, I believe, change sides in case of a major clash…
The burlesque and constant bureaucratic inertia of our administrative and judicial procedures obstructs and discourages the repressive actions of our police force. Everything seems to have been put in place to help and protect thugs — whose origin is very homogeneous indeed — and to paralyse our police and gendarmerie. Many of our disgruntled judicial police officers (OPJ) thus choose to resign; feeling despised, 2,600 of them handed in their notice in 2017. This means that they might end up joining a potential Popular Resistance in the coming civil war against the Occupation and its collaborators.
Interviewed by Le Figaro in July, François Grosdidier (LR), the head of the senatorial inquiry into the malaise afflicting our weary police, made the following lucid statement:
We are truly on the verge of collapse. Our police officers and gendarmes lack the adequate means to do their job. They are exposed to ever-increasing danger, the everyday violence of the housing estates, and systematic ambushes. … On the whole, they feel that they have fallen prey to growing aggression and hostility. … In the face of unpunished juvenile delinquency and daily incivility, they are under the impression of riding a chainless bicycle. Amidst the general absence of a criminal response, they are becoming more and more convinced that the physical risks they take are absolutely pointless. … They thus find themselves increasingly unable to put up with the violence that goes hand in hand with such legal insecurity.
Any police officer who defends himself is considered guilty, and our justice system immediately takes sides against him, in support of thugs and rioters. Likewise, the statal apparatus gives our police officers and gendarmes the impression of always being against them and disavowing them. In this regard, the Theo affair was a complete disaster. This African criminal and crook had falsely claimed he had been beaten and sodomised with a truncheon during a police identity check that culminated in a clash. Utter nonsense. The events sparked general outrage in the right-thinking media, which never bother to check the facts that suit them. As dictated by the religion of anti-racism, François Hollande, the then President of the French Republic, paid the faker a visit in hospital, although he had never been at the bedside of the police officers or gendarmes that had really been wounded or fallen victim to attempted murder! If this is not sheer demagoguery, I honestly cannot imagine what is.
The Theo affair has not been forgotten. Through the highly symbolic attitude of its leader, the state has given the police the disastrous signal that it favours the young population of immigrant origin, which acts as a breeding ground for delinquency, crime, urban insecurity and tomorrow’s guerrilla warfare. In the event of a civil war, I am convinced that the position of both the state and its apparatus — including our justice system — will be an ambiguous one to say the least; indeed, a large number of law enforcement personnel will have no difficulty in choosing sides, even at the cost of disobedience, unfortunately.
Police assaults have become a daily occurrence and punctuate our news broadcasts. On 4th July, 2018, a police couple was violently assaulted and injured in front of their toddler, on a public road in Aulnay-sous-Bois. The attack was carried out by thugs who had recognised the two police officers and whose ethnic origin the media have kept secret. The previous weekend, in the Ain region, a police officer was severely beaten in his home by approximately fifteen rabid ‘Chances-for-France’ (resulting in a thirty-one-day work absence for him). And get this: despite having been badly battered, he managed to free himself and escape death by using his service pistol, in an act of legitimate self-defence that resulted in a leg injury for one of the aggressors. Oh calamity of calamities! Charges were immediately brought against him by the public prosecutor’s office of Bourg-en-Bresse! The investigation was entrusted to the Judicial Police of Lyons and complemented by a disciplinary investigation conducted by the General Inspectorate of the National Police (IGPN). Instead of defending himself, the unfortunate policeman should apparently have allowed his attackers to beat him to death. To Americans, such a scenario would only seem possible in a country afflicted with a collective sort of mental pathology; in the USA, you have the right to simply gun down any intruder that has broken into your home or gained entry to it by means of deception. This is plain common sense, no more, no less.
In May and June 2018, four similar incidents were identified in France, including one that took place in Menton and involved plain-clothed policemen going to dine in a restaurant. They were battered by thirty individuals whose common origin we can all guess. One of the officers had to take thirty-day leave of absence for TIW.[130]