In Slovakia, the outgoing Prime Minister, Robert Fico, had his mandate renewed after a campaign focused on his refusal to welcome a single Muslim refugee. And this reflects precisely what we are dealing with here — an invasion of our world at the hands of Islam, to call a spade a spade. This fact should please Tarik Ramadan, the Muslim ideologist preaching the conquest of Europe, whose authority was recently undermined by the rape charges filed against him by numerous women.
By resisting the invasion, the above-mentioned states contravene the Schengen Treaty and disobey the injunctions of EU officials. For Nicolas Bay, the then secretary general of the Front national[9] (whose correct title is now Rassemblement national, having undergone a dramatic change of name, as we can all see): ‘What these unelected commissioners reproach the — democratically elected — governments of Poland and Hungary for is actually their decision not to comply with their injunctions on “the welcoming of migrants” and other similarly suicidal impulses’ (in Valeurs actuelles,[10] 3rd–9th March, 2016; as stated in the opinion column entitled ‘When the Union Strives to Prevent European Nations from Protecting Themselves’). The fact that the institutions in Brussels choose to negate our European civilisation, as well as its values, traditions and future, is not only due to the EU as such, as Mr Bay understands it, but results, above all, from the European governments themselves.
This issue is thus well worth pondering.
Today, the central issue is still embodied by the president of Turkey, the Islamic autocratic ‘sultan’ Erdogan, and his blackmailing efforts. With France (now led by the cosmopolitan and affected Emmanuel Macron) no longer taken into account, he has been negotiating with Germany to be given billions of euros in exchange for blocking the immigration stemming from Turkey, which is a fool’s bargain. Additionally, he has been demanding the abolition of visas for Turkish visitors to the Schengen area and the resumption of negotiations that would grant Turkey EU membership.
Erdogan’s goal is, in fact, identical to that of the Islamists and the criminal entity known as DAESH: to realise the age-old dream of Islamising Europe.
Hans Werner Sinn, the director of the Institute for Economic Research in Munich (IFO), believes that ‘whenever Germany is not docile enough for them, the Turks allow additional refugees into Europe’. What Erdogan is actually following in this regard is an understandable historical logic, namely that of the Ottoman Empire, which he is now attempting to resurrect — a conquest of our lands that would place the latter under Turkish rule not by means of (military) force but through cunning, rooted in immigrational invasion and high birth rates.
‘One can indeed speak of an Arab invasion [in Europe]; it is a social fact’, said the Pope. Yet he rejoices!
Indeed, he goes on to add:
The invasions that Europe has experienced have truly been numerous! And it has always found the ability to surpass itself, to move forward and thus find itself enhanced by cultural exchange [as stated in an interview with left-wing Catholics in La Vie Hebdo[11].
Is this naivety? Cynicism? Blindness? Or a mixture of the three? Whatever the case, in his position on the alleged benefits of ‘invasions’, what the Pope displays is a complete lack of historical knowledge stemming either from his own ignorance or from his ideological dogmatism. He thus labels sanguinary confrontations — the Crusades, the Muslim domination that Spain experienced for centuries, etc. — an ‘exchange’. His remarks reflect a strange kinship with Trotskyist views. Hence the suspicions regarding his possibly belonging to the South-American circles embracing liberation theology.[12] His statements truly resemble those of certain leftist Islamophilic intellectuals.
A complete traitor, Pope Francis has already attracted attention to himself through his moral encouragement of Muslim immigration and his opposition to any sort of impediment to the same, all in the name of a rather delirious and insane conception of Christian charity. In a suicidal manner and in opposition to the opinions of genuinely Catholic people, the current Catholic hierarchy is following a path that borders on that of the atheistic/Islamophilic Left. On the other hand, the religious authorities of the Jewish community have been careful not to adopt such positions because of the obvious correlation between Islamisation and anti-Semitism. As for the massive persecutions against the Christians of the Orient, which have only been very weakly condemned, they are simply written off… And one is particularly diligent to ensure that Islam as such is never burdened with responsibility for such actions!
The seriousness of the Pope’s words and behaviour towards our enemies is a source of concern. And I, for one, consider it all to be unforgivable.
The most lucid and courageous individuals are often found among Muslim-Arab intellectuals (whether men or women), for the simple reason that they know the matter well. A good example is Algerian writer and journalist Kamel Daoud, who was dragged through the mud by both leftists and the intelligentsia. Having won the Prix Goncourt du premier roman[13] for Meursault, contre-enquête,[14] he was subsequently accused of Islamophobia, the capital sin of our time and age, and is being threatened with a fatwa launched by Islamists, in addition to a constant mediatic lynching effort organised by the Left’s elite collaborationists.
In an interview published by La Repubblica (‘Cologne, a Place of Fantasies’) and translated in Le Monde, he offers an explanation of the sexual assaults committed by oriental immigrants against German women in Cologne on New Year’s Eve, declaring it to be the mere expected outcome of the frustrated sexuality of Muslim-Arab men.
He has thus dared to say:
Sex represents the greatest misery in the world of allah, so much so that it has given birth to the porno-Islamism that preachers make use of in their speech aimed at recruiting the faithfuclass="underline" a description of a paradise that is more like a brothel than a reward for pious people; a fantasy of virgins for the suicide bomber.
Kamel Daoud is, in fact, accused of apostasy by both jihadists and their French collaborators. He is a traitor, a modern harki: ‘Today, it is the verdict of Islamophobia that serves as an inquisition’, he later says.
A similar case is that of Mohammed Sifaoui, the author of Pourquoi l’islamisme séduit-il?,[15] who writes: ‘In the name of some silly cultural relativism, the useful idiots of the Left and Right prevent … the criticism and discussion of fanatical dogmas.’ He, too, has fallen victim to retribution at the hands of his co-religionists and the intelligentsia.
Another scandalous Algerian writer is Boualem Sansal, who is greatly frowned upon by the authorities of his country and caused an outrage with his anticipatory novel entitled 2084, in which he describes ‘a world dominated by radical Islamism’. All these authors predict an ethnic and religious civil war in Europe, a Europe in great danger and filled with new populations, all of whom, or almost, abide by the word of the prophet Mohamed.[16]
9
TN: The former ‘National Front’, which was recently renamed
10
TN:
11
TN:
12
TN: ‘Liberation theology’ is a synthesis of Christian theology and Marxist socio-economic analyses focusing on social concern for the poor and the political liberation of oppressed peoples.
13
TN: The Prix Goncourt prize for the best debut novel, which is awarded on annual basis in France.
14
TN:
15
TN:
16
AN: Have a look at the graph presented in this article, including the link on the next page; it shows that the newcomers are mainly from the Orient and thus mostly Muslims: https://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2018/06/28/migrations-vers-l-europe-les-chiffres-et-les-routes_5322410_3214.html.