Sansal made the following declaration to Vzebek and Rika magazine: ‘Soon, we shall all be Muslims, so make sure you revise your Koran’. And here is what he has stated in the L’Express: ‘What Islamism has found in the Maghrebian community in France, which is very strongly communitarised, is a favourable breeding ground’ (24th February, 2016).
With the fall in oil and gas prices, Algeria is plunging into recession, since its regime, both corrupt and incapable, has practically left the country living almost exclusively off exported hydrocarbon revenues. In order to buy social peace and compensate for endemic unemployment, the regime subsidises and ‘sprinkles’ the population, to use Sansal’s own words. The latter predicts a flare-up in an Algeria where Islamists are already on the verge of power.
‘A Syrian scenario is indeed possible in Algeria’, he told Le Figaro on 24th February, 2016. In his eyes, his country is a time bomb:
Bouteflika has surrendered the governance of the Algerian people to the Islamists. In small towns and villages, they are the masters of the game and enforce their terrifying theocratic rules. … Algeria is heading towards chaos. … A scenario of slavery and terror, in accordance with the Syrian model, seems rather credible to me. … What is now a political problem shall be transformed into a religious issue and exported beyond Algerian borders, to Europe and particularly France.
France is therefore threatened by a new wave of immigration and a massive exodus stemming from Algeria, a migration movement that obviously suits the plans devised by allah’s madmen. Yet Sansal goes even further:
Little by little, the Muslim world is rebuilding itself and regaining its original ambitions and hegemonic will. The abolishment of the border that separates it from the West has already begun, since political Islam is now able to gain ground in London, Paris and Brussels. One can thus estimate that in thirty years’ time, Islamism will rule the entire Muslim world that it has unified. And in sixty years’ time, it will set out to conquer Western civilisation [as stated in the above-mentioned article].
These events will, in truth, probably transpire well before that… As for Sansal, he has found himself censored and threatened in his own country: ‘Fear now prevails everywhere; it follows me wherever I am, whether in Algiers or in Paris.’ When one is an Arab, criticising Islam is synonymous with drawing a target on one’s own forehead.
These lucid (and courageous) Muslim intellectuals are, however, a minority. The appeased and reformed Islam that they wish for is a distant dream invalidated by the very reality we observe. The most extraordinary paradox is the betrayal that certain European elites are guilty of, elites that act as both the accomplices and the organisers of mass immigration and Islamisation alike. They oppose those lucid Muslim-Arab minorities and turn their backs on the common good. It is the very same configuration as the one that characterised the 1940–1944 period, namely Collaboration; or, more to the point, the FLN’s French ‘suitcase carriers’[17] during the Algerian war.
The strength of this invasive movement lies in its reliance on the pity aroused by the system’s media for those ‘refugees’ — and especially the boat people that end up drowning — in the minds of our versatile and emotional public. These millions of Muslim migrants that come from open-air waste bins such as the Middle East, Afghanistan, North Africa and Black Africa and arrive in Europe, adding to the Muslim masses already present, will of course import their problems and chaos along with their persons, with Islam at the very centre of this future flare-up. It is this probable development that Ivan Rioufol mentions in his book entitled La guerre civile qui vient[18] (Pierre Guillaume de Roux Editions).
We must therefore prepare for the worst (or perhaps the best, depending on the opinion): a racial war in Europe, in the West, and above all in France.
Jacques Attali and His Clique Want Europe to Welcome Millions of Other Africans — No, Thank You!
On 20th June, 2018, Jacques Attali wrote the following in L’Express:
The only solution is for us to understand, as soon as possible, that it is in our interest to massively develop this neighbouring continent [Africa] and help accelerate its demographic transition; to organise the coming of migrants to Europe; and to create the necessary conditions [on European soil] to welcome and integrate millions of people into our cultures upon their arrival from this cradle of humanity.
Charming prospect, is it not? In a 2015 interview with Le Soir,[19] Attali also stated that ‘the arrival of migrants is an incredible chance for us. These people will turn Europe into the world’s leading power’.
What mind-boggling optimism! Let us quote him one last time so as to highlight his consistency. Indeed, during the presidential election campaign of 2012, he made the following affirmation on I-TV:
Today, we have 100,000 foreigners returning home every year, with all demographers and statisticians [Is that so? Which ones, pray tell!] saying that we are in need of 300,000 foreign workers a year in France alone.
If Jacques Attali, a Jewish thinker and influential political advisor, were the only one making such statements, we could simply consider him an isolated psychopath and disregard his ideas. The trouble is that this very same position is also advocated by the United Nations, as seen in most of the organisation’s official reports. On 19th December, 2018, the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, which had been signed a few days earlier in Marrakech by many European countries (including France, of course), was formally adopted. Among other things, the text states that we are required to ‘create favourable conditions for all migrants to enrich our societies through their human, economic and social capabilities’.[20] It also emphasises the need for states to rescue migrants that choose to take dangerous routes. In other words, it is our duty to locate these boats as soon as they set sail and bring the migrants home with us. Later on, it is stipulated that the signatory states undertake ‘to eliminate all forms of discrimination and condemn and combat all expressions, manifestations and acts of racism, racial discrimination, violence and xenophobia against all migrants’ (which would affect all of us nationalists). And even if this text is not legally binding, we can trust leaders such as Macron and Merkel to implement it in their respective countries, thus exacerbating the situation further while repressing the identitarian free speech of all anti-immigration activists among us.
In actual fact, this pact is an extension of a bewildering document, one which was, for a long time, easily accessible on the internet but can nowadays only be found in a more clandestine way. What this document advocated was replacement migration for most Western countries. With a single verbal stream from their microphones, journalists dismiss those who are worried about a Great Replacement that is deemed mere fantasy, although that is precisely what the UN is formulating and organising. In this text, whose subheading was A Solution to the Decline and Aging of the Population, one could read the following passage:[21]
17
TN: The ‘suitcase carriers’ were a network of leftist activists who chose to transport documents including brochures and newspapers to the French territory, or alternatively to Belgium, Switzerland and Germany. Although some of them did transport arms, the majority carried documents or even money that was raised in France by FLN activists.
18
TN:
20
AN: The source of the information can be found here: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacte_mondial_sur_les_migrations.