Выбрать главу

Brophy, J. (2006). Grade repetition. Education policy series 6. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.

Carnoy, M. (2007). Cuba's academic advantage. Why students in Cuba do better in school. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Castells, M., Himanen, P. (2002). The information society and the welfare state: The Finnish model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Committee Report (2005). Report of the committee on transition from basic to secondary education and training. Reports of Ministry of Education 33. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education. How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.

Department of Education (2010). The importance of teaching: The schools white paper. London: Department of Education.

Dohn, N. B. (2007). Knowledge and skills for PISA. Assessing the assessment. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(1), 1–16.

Elley, W. B. (Ed.). (1992). How in the world do students read? Hamburg: Grindeldruck.

European Commission (2004). Common European principles for teacher competences and qualifications. Brussels: Directorate-General for Education and Culture, http://www.see-educoop.net/education-in/pdf/01-en-prin-ciples-en.pdf

Fullan, M. (2010). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Fullan, M. (2011). Choosing wrong drivers for whole system reform (Seminar series 204). Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education.

Gameran, E. (2008, February 29). What makes Finnish kids so smart. Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120425355065601997.html

Goldstein, H. (2004). International comparisons of student attainment: Some issues arising from the PISA study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11(3), 319–330.

Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA «effect» in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.

Grubb, N. (2007). Dynamic inequality and intervention: Lessons for a small country. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 105–114.

Häivälä, K. (2009). Voice of upper-secondaiy school teachers: Subject teachers perceptions of changes and visions in upper secondary schools. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis С 283 (in Finnish). Turku: University of Turku.

Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society. Education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.

Hargreaves, A., Crocker, R., Davis, B., et al. (2009). The learning mosaic: A multiple perspectives review of the Alberta initiative for school improvement. Edmonton: Alberta Education.

Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., Manning, M. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hargreaves, A., Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hargreaves, A., Goodson, I., (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3–41.

Hargreaves, A., Halasz, G., Pont, B. (2008). The Finnish approach to system leadership // B. Pont, D. Nusche, D. Hopkins (Eds.), Improving school leadership, vol. 2: Case studies on system leadership (pp. 69–109). Paris: OECD.

Hargreaves, A., Shirley, D. (2009). The Fourth Way: The inspiring future of educational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Hautamäki, J., Haijunen, E., Hautamäki, A., et al. (2008). PISA06 Finland: Analyses, reflections and explanations. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.

Hellström, M. (2004). Muutosote. Akvaarioprojektin pedagogisten kehittamishankkeiden toteutustapa ja onnistuminen [The way of change — The implementation and success of pedagogical development projects at the experimental schools of the Aquarium-project]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

Itkonen, T., Jahnukainen, M. (2007). An analysis of accountability policies in Finland and the United States. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54(1), 5–23.

Jakku-Sihvonen, R., Niemi, H. (Eds.) (2006). Research-based teacher education in Finland: Reflections by Finnish teacher educators. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.

Jennings, J., Stark Rentner, D. (2006). Ten big effects of the No Child Left Behind Act on public schools. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

Jimerson, S. (2001). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30, 420–437.

Jokinen, H., Välijärvi, J. (2006). Making mentoring a tool for supporting teachers' professional development // R. Jakku-Sihvonen, H. Niemi (Eds.), Research-based teacher education in Finland: Reflections by Finnish teacher educators (pp. 89–101). Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association.

Joyce, B., Weil, M. (1986). Models of teaching (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Jussila, J., Saari, S. (Eds.). (2000). Teacher education as a future-moulding factor: International evaluation of teacher education in Finnish universities. Helsinki: Higher Education Evaluation Council.

Kangasniemi, S. (2008, Februaiy 27). Millä ammatilla pääsee naimisiin? [With which profession to get married?] Helsingin Sanomat Koulutusliite, pp. 4–6.

Kasvio, M. (Ed.). (2011) The best school in the world: Seven Finnish examples from the 21st century. Helsinki: Museum of Finnish Architecture.

Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe. The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kets de Vries, M. (2006). The leader on the couch. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kiuasmaa, K. (1982). Oppikoulu 1880–1980: Oppikouluja sen opettajat koulujärjestyksesta peruskouluun [Grammar school 1880–1980: Grammar school and its teachers from school order to comprehensive school]. Oulu, Finland: Kustannusosakeyhtiö Pohjoinen.

Koskenniemi, M. (1944). Kansakoulun opetusoppi [Didactics of primary school]. Helsinki: Otava.

Kumpulainen, T. (Ed.). (2008). Opettajat Suomessa 2008 [Teachers in Finland 2008]. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.

Kupari, P., Välijärvi, J. (Eds.). (2005). Osaaminen kestävällä pohjalla. PISA 2003 Suomessa [Competences on the solid ground. PISA 2003 in Finland]. Jyväskylä: Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskulä.

Kuusi, P. (1961). 60-luvun sosiaalipolitiikka [Social politics of the 1960s]. Porvoo: WSOY.

Laukkanen, R. (1998). Accountability and evaluation: Decision-making structures and the utilization of evaluation in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42(2), 123–133.

Laukkanen, R. (2008). Finnish strategy for high-level education for all // N. C. Sognel, P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and performance of education systems (pp. 305–324). Dordrecht: Springer.

Lavonen, J., Krzywacki-Vainio, H., Aksela, M., et al. (2007). Pre-service teacher education in chemistry, mathematics and physics // E. Pehkonen, M. Ahtee, J. Lavonen (Eds.), How Finns learn mathematics and science (pp. 49–68). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Lehtinen, E. (2004). Koulutusjärjestelmä suomalaisen yhteiskunnan muutoksessa [Education system in the changing Finnish society]. Helsinki: Sitra.

Lehtinen, E., Kinnunen, R., Vauras, M., et al. (1989). Oppimiskäsitys [Conception of knowledge], Helsinki: Valtion painatuskeskus.

Levin, B. (1998). An epidemic of education policy: (What) can we learn from each other? Comparative Education, 34(2), 131–141.

Lewis, R. (2005). Finland, cultural lone wolf. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

Liiten, M. (2004, Februaiy 11). Ykkössuosikki: Opettajan ammatti [Top favorite: Teaching Profession]. Helsingin Sanomat. http://www.hs.fi/artikkeli/Yk-k%C3%B6ssuosikki+opettajan+ammatti/1076151893860

Linnakylä, P. (2004). Finland // H. Döbert, E. Klieme, W. Stroka (Eds.), Conditions of school performance in seven countries. A quest for understanding the international variation of PISA results (pp. 150–218). Münster: Waxmann.

Linnakylä, P., Saari, H. (1993). Oppiiko oppilas peruskoulussa? Peruskoulu arviointi 90-tutkimuksen tuloksia [Does pupil learn in peruskoulu? Findings of the Peruskoulu 90 research]. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopiston kasvatustieteiden tutkimuslaitos.

MacKinnon, N. (2011). The urgent need for new approaches in school evaluation to enable Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23(1), 89–106.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzales, E. J., et al. (2000). TIMSS 1999 international science report: Findings from IEA's repeat of the third international mathematics and science study at the eighth grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

Matti, T. (Ed.). (2009). Northern lights on PISA 2006. Differences and similarities in the Nordic countries. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.

Miettinen, R. (1990). Koulun muuttamisen mahdollisuudesta [About the possibilities of school change]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

Ministry of Education (2004). Development plan for education and research 2003–2008. Helsinki: Author.

Ministry of Education (2007). Opettajankoulutus 2020 [Teacher Education 2020]. Committee Report 44. Helsinki: Author.

Ministry of Education (2009). Ensuring professional competence and improving opportunities for continuing education in education (Committee report 16). Helsinki: Author.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2010). How Finland will demonstrate its strengths by solving the world's most intractable problems: Final report of the country brand delegation. Helsinki: Author.

Mortimore, P. (2009). Alternative models for analysing and representing countries' performance in PISA Paper commissioned by Education International Research Institute. Brussels: Education International.

Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C, Barber, M. (2010). How the world's most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey & Company.

Murgatroyd, S. (2007). Accountability project framework-Developing school based accountability. Unpublished Report. Edmonton: The Innovation Expedition Inc.

National Youth Survey (2010). KNT 2010. Helsinki: 15/30 Research.

National Board of Education (1999). A framework for evaluating educational outcomes in Finland. Helsinki: Author.

Newsweek (1999, May 24). The future is Finnish. http://www.newsweek.com/1999/05/23/the-future-is-finnish.html

Newsweek (2010, August 17). The world’s best countries. http://www.news-week.com/feature/2010/the-world-s-best-countries.html

Nichols, S. L., Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America's schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Niemi, H. (2008). Research-based teacher education for teachers’ lifelong learning. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 13(1), 61–69.

Nuikkinen, K. (2011). Learning spaces: How they meet evolving educational needs // M. Kasvio (Ed.), The best school in the world: Seven Finnish examples from the 21st century (pp. 10–19). Helsinki: Museum of Finnish Architecture.

OECD (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris: Author.

OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world. First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Author.

OECD (2005a). Equity in education. Thematic review of Finland. Paris: Author.

OECD (2005b). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Author.

OECD (2007). PISA 2006. Science competencies for tomorrow's world. Vol. 1. Paris: Author.

OECD (2008). Trends shaping education. Paris: Author.

OECD (2010a). Education at a glance. Education indicators. Paris: Author.

OECD (2010b). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in reading, mathematics and science. Vol. 1. Paris: Author.

OECD (2010c). Strong performers and successful reformers in education. Lessons from PISA for the United States. Paris: Author.