“These may be needed,” she observed. “Come on, then. Back to the sitting room. Let’s see what you want.”
Very much in control, she swept out of the kitchen, and up the stairs to the sitting room, with Flavia close behind and Argyll bringing up the rear with the tray. He was in full agreement that it was of central importance, and busied himself pouring and distributing while the other two settled themselves into position in the overstuffed armchairs and prepared for combat.
“All right then,” Flavia began. “I’ll give you an account of the day Forster died. Round about lunch-time, Jonathan and Edward Byrnes are eating together. At two-thirty, or thereabouts, he rings Forster and says he wants to talk to him about a picture. A stolen one. Immediately afterwards, it seems, Forster leaves the house and heads for Norwich, where he visits and empties his safe deposit box. Later that evening, he is visited by George Barton, and has an acrimonious fight about George’s forthcoming eviction. George leaves, and is seen by his son-in-law, Gordon. Around nine o’clock, Forster falls down the stairs, breaks his neck and dies.
“His body is discovered the next morning by Jonathan. Gordon, at the time of the death, is in bed with Sally, the barmaid; George was visiting his daughter and Mrs. Forster was with her lover.”
“With her what?” Mary said with astonishment.
“True, apparently.”
“Good God! My opinion of her rises all the time.”
“Yes. Anyway, the point is that nobody saw, heard, smelt, suspected, divined or guessed that anything was wrong. So much so that the police here, I gather, now agree. As far as they are concerned, the case of Forster’s death is closed until such time as there is some evidence to justify reopening it.”
“That’s a relief,” Mary said. “Everybody will be very pleased.”
“So what do we conclude? That Forster’s trip into Norwich had nothing to do with Jonathan. That his death was an accident. That his willingness to talk to him about a stolen Uccello was also unconnected to his death.”
Mary Verney looked placidly interested, but said nothing.
“Even so, there is evidence that Forster was connected in some way with the theft of pictures. Three statements from three people, none of whom know each other, all point to that. And, of course, there was the burning of Forster’s papers, for which deed we must pencil in Mrs. Forster. She returns to find her husband dead and also under investigation as a thief on a grand scale. Perhaps she knows it’s true. So to protect what little money she has, she decides to bring the police investigation into this angle of her husband’s life to an abrupt halt. End of story.”
Mary Verney continued to look calm, but companionably distressed at such an unsatisfactory conclusion.
“The trouble is, of course,” Flavia went on, “that however agreeable this is as an explanation, it is not true.”
“Oh. Are you sure?”
“Fairly certain, yes.” .
“Why?”
“Firstly, because the police say they went out of their way to make sure that Jessica Forster did not learn from them that her husband was suspected of any thefts. They say they asked her about matters surrounding his death. Nothing about anything else. She may have known he was a thief, but there was nothing to let her know that anyone else suspected and that she had to act. So, how did she know?”
There was a long silence as Mrs. Verney drained her glass, then spoke: “Simple. I told her.”
“Why?”
“Why do you think? I don’t like her much, but living with Geoffrey was punishment enough for one lifetime. There was no need for her to suffer from him beyond the grave. I wanted to spare the poor thing the turmoil of having everything she owned—or he owned—taken away from her by vengeful victims. So when she came to visit that afternoon I told her that if she was going to do anything to defend herself, she’d have to move fast. Personally, I think it was good advice.”
“And she rushed out with the matches?”
“No. I rushed out with the matches. She was dithering too much to do anything herself. She asked my advice, and I gave it. She asked my help, and I gave that too.”
“That is a serious offence.”
Mrs. Verney seemed blithely unconcerned. “I can’t see how it changes anything, myself.”
Flavia gave her a look of profound disapproval. “Very humanitarian of you. It’s a pity it’s not true either.”
“I’m afraid it is. I nearly put my back out lifting all that paper.”
“I don’t mean that. I mean your motives. You did not put the idea into her head to get rid of evidence indicating Forster was a thief. Nor did you do it when she came to visit.”
“No?”
“No. You did it to disguise the fact that there wasn’t the slightest bit of evidence that he was a crook. And you went round to see to it after we got back from London and Jonathan said he’d be looking into his papers to see what he sold from here.”
“But it was raining.”
“It was stopping when we arrived.”
“And why would I do that? What was it to me?”
“Because the papers would have probably revealed that he was bleeding you and your family dry by threatening to reveal that for years your kleptomaniacal cousin had been touring the country houses of Europe lifting masterpieces.”
“Goodness! What a lovely idea. What leads you to that?”
“Enough, I think.”
“For example?”
“Forster, to start off with. What evidence is there that he stole paintings? Suggestions by three people, his comments to Jonathan, and his death. But he hardly lived like a vastly successful criminal; there were obvious signs of a shortage of money, and no indications at all that any is hidden away.
“He is meant to have spent ages touring round Europe stealing things, but his wife said he hated travelling and had hardly left Norfolk except for day trips to London since he moved here. He was, admittedly, in Florence when the Uccello disappeared. But so was your cousin Veronica, at della Quercia’s. Virtually next door and with access to the Palazzo Straga. And your cousin was on the guest list for the Dunkeld wedding in 1976 and he was not. Your cousin had a reputation for taking things; whereas until last week, Forster did not.
“None of that is enough to acquit Forster or condemn your cousin. But think of his relations with her. She didn’t like him in Florence, it seems, but brings him in to help look after the collection. Why? It hardly needed looking after. She pays him a salary, virtually gives him a house, and begins to transfer other property in a way which made it entirely his when she died. A lot of money for not very much. If he was a thief it doesn’t make sense. If he was blackmailing a thief, then it does.”
Mary Verney took a sip of her glass, and regarded Flavia with some affection. Flavia noted that she seemed neither indignant at listening to such a travesty, nor nervous about it either.
“I see. Interesting. But I wouldn’t try going to court on it. Even Dr. Johnson—indiscreet old buffer though he is—would have a hard time persuading a jury that someone as obviously scatty as my poor old cousin could manage the sort of planning your Giotto would have required for success. I mean, stealing things is only part of it, isn’t it?”
“Oh, yes. And I’m sure that her success was largely because she stole things at random, knew only faded and impecunious aristocrats like herself whose collections are precisely the sort which aren’t catalogued or insured too well. It took Bottando to turn lunacy into method, and see craziness as breathtaking skill. As for getting rid of them, she wouldn’t have to. Winterton would do that.”
Mary looked surprised at the name. “Winterton? Why him?”
“Come now,” Flavia said severely. “You can do better than that. You know perfectly well why him. He’s the man who went and talked to Sandano three months ago to find out what he knew about the Fra Angelico theft. Fifties or older with thick dark hair, so Sandano says. That matches Winterton, but Forster was grey and a bit thin on top. Nice touch to give Sandano one of Forster’s cards, though.”