0 the US as a whole and their social institutes - the State Department, the Federal Reserve, the RAND Corporation, the CIA, Harvard University and some other «think tanks» [13];
0 The United Kingdom - the royal family and, grouping around it, freemasons and their periphery, and also the intelligence service (Mi5) of the UK [14];
0 Jews in general, “world rabbinate” and Rothschilds, in particular; [15]
0 Vatican and enclosed on it orders and structures of clans old European aristocracy;
0 Internationals (Soc-Intern - transformation of capitalism into pseudo-socialism by the way of reforms, 4th Socialist International - marxist-revolutionary, Trotskyite - transition to pseudo-socialism by the way of revolution and establishment of a “dictatorship of the proletariat”), which mass media seldom mention [16].
? Professional political analysts, being unaware of the biblical project’s conception of control, prefer to maintain and replenish the “register” of politically active clans and groups, and analyse their deeds similarly to chess games analytics. Aims of such analysts are to find allies for customers of their research and to implement their own political ambitions. The circumstance that every known clan operates under the authority of one or the other crowd-”elitist” conception (or its specific version), expressed in a certain ideology, does not fit into the worldview of such analysts. Hence the analysis of conceptions as objective phenomena, mostly “living” on their own (“living their own life”), and determining the face of the globalization, is not of interest to such analysts.
? Hostility of the rest of the world towards policies, lying in the mainstream of the biblical project of globalization (foreign policy of the US and European countries, and prevalent transnational social institutions in them), - became a factor, under the influence of which a number of states have started to set themselves a twofold task:
0 to defend own historically-cultural heritage, national peculiarity, and potential of distinctive development, from elimination in the course of biblical globalization;
0 to suggest to the rest of the world as universal values their own “values”, i.e. ideals, typical and precious to their regional civilizations from ancient times.
? Because of this the started stage of globalization is characterised not only by the crisis of governance of the biblical conception, but also by the creation of globalization projects by different cultures. These projects are alternative to the biblical one [17], and correspond to the official statements on that matter. In relation to the biblical culture these alternative globalization projects are “non-systemic factors” and cannot be understood appropriately based on the beliefs formed by the biblical culture in all its confessions and secular branches [18].
? The next question is when exactly did the current stage of globalization start? - The answer to it is ambiguous due to those social parameters, changes in which are chosen by people based on their subjective differentiation of stage borderlines.
If correlating with different parameters, there are different versions of the answer to the question. The new stage has begun:
0 with the allegorical statement of bolshevism about its status as a global political power in 1907 [19], but since bolshevism in that period had been using the marxist conceptual apparatus, that frontier for many was unnoticeable (like unnoticeable was the difference between bolshevism, marxism and trotskyism - such is the power of prejudices-stereotypes, formed under the influence of biblical culture on a person…);
0 with acquisition by bolshevism of its own conceptual apparatus in 1991 in the Conception of Public Security (CPS), however this frontier for many does not exist either, because CPS is spread in the society by personal initiative and does not appear in the officialdom of state politics of Russian Federation. Hence many “supporters-evaluators” of CPS and of work of IP USSR are concerned with a futile question: “20 years has passed: where are the results of the impact of COB on life of the society?”;
0 with publication in 2006 of the document “The Frontier Within: Japan's Goals in the 21st Century” [20], in which outlined are views of Japan’s political officialdom on achievement of the dominant position in control of the globalization in 21st century, although so far it is more of a “declaration of intent” and not a finished globalization project the Japanese-way.
0 with a number of mutually complementing each other publications in the press of the PRC (People’s Republic of China) from the start of 2013 of suggestions of “chinese values” to the rest of the world as universal [21]; and of return of the foreign policy of PRC to the principle of marxism’s “internationalism” [22].
? I.e. if de-facto the current globalization stage has begun with bolshevism stating its status as a global political power in 1907, then de-jure it has begun with the official PRC statements in January 2013 about the presence of the Chinese globalization project based on the principles of
? Main components of the spectrum of globalization conception today. Respectively to historically established circumstances to date, the following globalization projects are present and active:
The biblical project of enslavement of mankind on behalf of God exists in several versions:
0 bourgeois-liberalism, which, due to the declaration of the principle of religious toleration, oversees all traditional so called “Abrahamic” religions (“judaism”, “christianity”, including “orthodoxy”, “islam” - in all their branches, not inclined to revolutionary transformation of the world);
0 marxist pseudo-socialist, revolutionary-terroristic, intrigantish, where the keepers of traditions are the followers of L.D. Bronstein (Trotsky);
0 Convergence theory, presupposing the retention of crowd-”elitism” in forms incorporating personal “freedom” of bourgeois-liberalism and state-planning nature of pseudo-socialistic economy based on marxism, high level of the social security for individuals by restraining the consumption race and solving biosphere-environmental problems with help of the planned economy (adherents of this version are lobbying an evolutionary-reformist transition from what is historically real, to some ideal, which currently is not quite defined in their theories, because “descendants are not dumber than we are and will do everything themselves, according to the specifics of circumstances, unpredictable for us”) [23];