The Urban Dictionary defines soy boy as being slang for, “males who completely and utterly lack all necessary masculine qualities. This pathetic state is usually achieved by an over-indulgence of emasculating products and/or ideologies.”493
Calling someone a soy boy is like calling them a pussy, except the term soy boy is so much more accurate because it describes one of the scientific causes for their weakness and femininity. The term is so precise and self-explanatory that it hurts the feelings of those with soy syndrome so bad that Leftists have deemed the term one of the most vile insults in the English language.
A writer for The New York Times claimed that if you call someone a soy boy, you’re basically a Nazi. In an Op-Ed about how “America’s Boys are Broken” the writer claimed, “Too many boys are trapped in the same suffocating, outdated model of masculinity, where manhood is measured in strength,” and worried that they, “don’t even have the language to talk about how they feel about being trapped, because the language that exists to discuss the full range of human emotion is still viewed as sensitive and feminine.”494
The writer then uses a “case in point” that a few days earlier when he brought up his concerns on Twitter he got dozens of “hateful” replies, many of them calling him a “soy boy” which he described as, “a common insult among the alt-right that links soy intake to estrogen.”495
The Los Angeles Times ran the headline “‘Soy boy’ is the alt-right’s new most biting insult,” and said that, “in the imaginations of many among the alt-right, the Asian-native soybean has apparently come to symbolize creeping multiculturalism as well as the demise of the meat-and-potatoes man’s man.”496
Actually, it has nothing to do with “soybean symbolism.” Instead, studies show that consuming soy boosts estrogen levels, which is why for decades personal trainers have warned against drinking soy protein shakes, and instead recommend whey protein.
Some of the beta males at BuzzFeed called the “Try Guys” decided to test their testosterone levels in one of their YouTube videos, and the results confirmed the obvious, that they shouldn’t really be considered men. The average T-score for an adult male between the age of 25-34 is around 600 ng/dL.497
The four “men” at BuzzFeed who tested their levels came back with results ranging from a low of 212 to a high of 363.498 For a frame of reference, a typical 85-year-old man has an average T-score of 376 ng/dL, which is higher than the highest score any of the “men” at BuzzFeed had, who are all in their late twenties and early thirties.
In recent years, sperm counts in western men have been dropping dramatically, down by more than 50% over the last 40 years.499 Scientists say they don’t know why, but maybe they’re just afraid to admit the truth. Men are consuming too much soy, along with a variety of other chemicals finding their way into our food and water which are having adverse effects on our bodies and minds.
Men’s Health magazine published an article looking into the “dark side” of soy titled, “Is This The Most Dangerous Food For Men?” and warned that it “has the power to undermine everything it means to be male.”500 Their investigation detailed the case of a retired U.S. Army officer whose estrogen levels were eight times higher than normal for a man from simply using soy milk in his cereal every morning.
He went to see a doctor because he was developing breasts (gynecomastia) and had no sex drive any more and after going to several different doctors looking for answers, one of them suspected soy after examining his diet. Once he quit consuming it, his estrogen levels immediately began dropping back down to normal.
Alex Jones, the founder of Infowars, is often mocked for a rant he did about how the government or corporations are “putting chemicals in the water that turn the fricking frogs gay,” but the evidence shows that’s exactly what’s happening.501 A study at the University of California, Berkeley showed that the pesticide atrazine causes 10% of male frogs to mutate from males into females and chemically castrates 75% of the others.502
Some fish are now mutating because of chemicals in the water and changing sex, and the males are becoming so feminized they can’t successfully breed. The London Independent reported, “In some rivers, all the male roach [fish] were found to have been feminized to a degree because of high levels of estrogen, which is used along with progestin in birth-control pills to prevent ovulation and is also present in other drugs.”503
A professor involved in the study said, “We’re starting to establish not just effects on gender, but that they can also affect other physiological processes in the fish as well,” adding, “If they are moderately to severely feminized, they are compromised as individuals and they really struggle to pass their genes on.”504
It should be no surprise that chemicals in our food and water are having dramatic effects on our health, but it’s just too politically incorrect to even ask questions about whether they may be responsible for causing so many boys to be such sissies and for an alarming number of people to be confused about their gender or turning them into homosexuals.
The Gay Agenda
We as a society have to admit the fact that homosexual behavior is abnormal, whether the result of a birth defect or a mental disorder, or as some psychiatrists believe — a disruption in the Oedipal phase of children’s psychosexual development when they’re growing up.505 Something is wrong with gay people and to call their behavior normal is like saying someone born with feet on the ends of their arms has a “normal” human body. They don’t. And trying to tell them that there’s nothing wrong with them, hoping to make them feel better, is disingenuous.
Obviously we shouldn’t hate people who have birth defects, whether physical or mental, but we shouldn’t have to pretend they don’t exist in the name of being politically correct. And thinking science should search for a way to prevent more people from being born with the defect isn’t “hateful” either.
Because heterosexual people are normal people, the gays and bisexuals feel that society as a whole is “discriminating” against them and have coined the term “heteronormative” to describe this pervasive “oppression” they believe they are subjected to by straight people. Gays and bisexuals feel they shouldn’t be treated as an alternative to the norm, in a way that someone with blonde hair shouldn’t be treated as abnormal from someone who has brown hair.
But in the case of sexuality, there is a clear distinction because God (or mother nature, or whatever you want to call the “thing” that created every living creature on earth) clearly and intricately designed males and females to have intimate relations with members of the opposite sex.
To claim that heterosexuality isn’t normal or not the way that humans were designed to be would be like claiming that having 10 fingers and 10 toes isn’t “normal.” Sure, some people are born missing limbs, or with six fingers on one hand, but it’s certainly not normal, and is a birth defect. And to claim that homosexuality is “normal” would be saying it’s “normal” to ride a bike by sitting on the handlebars. Some people do, but that doesn’t mean it’s normal. That’s not how a bike was designed to be used. Sure it can be used that way, but that is a perversion, which by definition means using something in an abnormal or unnatural way.506