Выбрать главу

The General, started as a short story so long ago, was published in May. It has since gone through several hard and paperback editions, and been translated into half a dozen languages. The film rights were later bought for 30,000 dollars, and a movie made from the idea in Hollywood called Counterpoint, with Charlton Heston playing the lead.

Some reviewers of the novel suggested that I ‘get back to Nottingham’, in other words write only about what they had decided I knew best, or ought to know at all. This opinion was offensive, for I had always believed that a writer should show interest in people from any background, no matter what education they had had, or whatever profession or trade was followed. I had never intended to restrict my imagination by writing only about those who worked in factories or came from Nottingham. For reviewers and journalists to refer to me as ‘working class’ or ‘of the working class’ was as much a misconception as roping me into the ‘angry young man’ corral. It was even worse in the United States, where ex-Marxist subliterate reviewers used those dreadful words ‘prole’ and ‘proletarian’ in their articles.

I had never thought of myself as being of the so-called ‘working class’, or in any class at all. As a child the term would have been meaningless, since it was hard to imagine belonging even to my parents. In the factory I was judged by the amount of work I was expected to do, and looked on it as little more than a basic commercial transaction, and if any knowing lickspittle had in those days implied that I was a member of ‘the working class’ he would have been told in the harshest terms to find a quiet corner and indulge in sexual intercourse with himself. When I enlisted into the Royal Air Force it was to become a technician, with men from all kinds of background.

In France and Spain I had lived the life of a man with a private income, small as it was, so couldn’t have had anything to do with, or feeling for, the whole class issue, which seemed (and still does) to obsess the English, and to that extent at least I am a foreigner. When Tony Godwin said that someone like me must have strong opinions on ‘class’, he was told that I knew nothing about it, a mild response since he was likeable.

Nor did I feel any part of the ‘angry young man’ movement, if such there was, and I can’t think of any writers who did, for the label was used by journalists and others who wanted to classify those who wrote in ways they didn’t understand or care for — to define so as to defuse.

With some hesitation I allowed my name to be put on to the letter press of Arnold Wesker’s ‘Centre 42’. While respecting Wesker’s selfless efforts to educate ‘the workers’, it had always been obvious to me that anyone in England wanting to become knowledgeable or cultured, no matter what their income or status, could do so freely, and at little cost. They still can. Libraries are free, secondhand books almost given away, and a basic radio will provide familiarity with classical music.

In May news came that the weekly rate of my pension would be reduced to sixteen shillings, continuing until June 1962, when a terminal gratuity of seventy-five pounds would end it all — thirteen years after it had begun. I often wonder whether some unknown sympathizer at the Ministry of Pensions had divined my ambition, and secretly did his or her best to keep me going. However it was, such an extended period of cosseting merely for doing my duty turned into a much appreciated case of patronage.

Whether from shock at receiving news of being given the prestigious Hawthornden Prize for The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner, or from the cumulative effect of too much eating in restaurants, I took to bed for the longest period since Wroughton. A lump in my stomach had the shape and consistency of a cannon-ball, which suggested in more sombre moments that the bells of hell were at last going ting-a-ling-ling for me and no longer only for others. The cannonball area was painful to touch, but Dr Green, instead of rushing me off to the Knackerstone Hospital as a terminally ill patient, suggested it might have to do with the state of my liver, and that three days would see me still among the living. Obviously, the diet in Majorca had been healthier. At the Hawthornden ceremony in St James’s Square, I met Lord David Cecil, and Victor Pritchett who presented me with a prize which Robert Graves had gained in 1934 for I, Claudius.

It’s hard to say why the first rough-cut film version of Saturday Night and Sunday Morning made me so embarrassed that I wanted to sink back into my seat and disappear. The accents seemed hopelessly out of shape, but that shouldn’t have mattered, and no doubt wouldn’t to those who had no idea where Nottingham was anyway. If the accents had been right nobody would have understood a word. Nor, in spite of the authenticity of the locations, could I think the film showed the reality imagined while writing the book. Wanting the film to be exactly the one set going in my mind’s eye during that process was clearly unreasonable.

I was also weirdly perturbed at having set off the whole complex mechanism of a movie in the first place, and though in the end my unease remains a mystery, such sensations were to come back with my next film, and return even more fully some years later when a story was dramatized for BBC television, reinforcing my belief that the novel is merely a blueprint, while the film made out of it is something different. Such reality was a peculiar form of art because it left little to the viewer’s imagination, giving nothing to do except supinely watch.

My feelings also reflected the fact that whereas I had total control of a novel, with a film there was, in spite of writing the script, not very much. I suppose that finally my embarrassment was little more than chagrin at not being all powerful, but there was some comfort in the fact that the book existed for whoever cared to read it, and in knowing that the reader of fiction becomes his or her own film-maker, setting their particular and idiosyncratic cameras moving after the first word of novel or story registers on the brain, thus completing the work of the writer. There is no substitute for that unbeatable combination.

My brother Michael was to appear before a tribunal in Manchester as a conscientious objector to military service, and I went there to help defend him. It was inconceivable to me to be a pacifist, yet I had always believed that conscription was not compatible with a free society, in so far as one could be said to exist, and that the armed forces should be manned by volunteers. In times of war this opinion might have to be modified, but even then there had to be an outlet for people who objected on the sincerest principles to being called up.

My brother didn’t have a leg to stand on, you might say, because he had served as a bandsman for two years in the Territorial Army. On the other hand he played the fact to his advantage, saying that because he had already had some experience of military life, he now knew for genuine pacifist reasons that he did not want to be called upon to serve full-time.

Fortunately, because what he and I said at the tribunal had little effect, a schoolmaster of Michael’s, who had been in a Guards regiment and won the Military Cross during the war, wrote such an eloquent endorsement of my brother’s beliefs that the appeal was successful. The only penance for Michael was that he must work out his time in the food distribution industry, which he did willingly enough as a Co-op warehouseman. Had he lost his case I might well have helped him leave the country.

The Times Literary Supplement published my essay ‘On Both Sides of the Street’, in which I wrote that while most of the population were as yet unable to recognize themselves in a novel, should they care to pick one up, this situation was changing, and writers were appearing who would counter and ultimately stifle the stereotypes issued by films, radio and television. I damned Soviet-style writing as well, for portraying working people as heroic automatons, and using them in as false a fashion as the jokey creations of popular entertainment in western countries.