Выбрать главу

“Windscale: Six years later …” Rob Edwards, New Statesman, December 9, 1983, p. 11.

“Jenkin defends discharge into sea at Sellafield,” Ronald Faux, The (London) Times, December 10, 1983, p. 3.

“Nuclear watchdog condemns Sellafield safety,” Richard Norton-Taylor and Peter Hetherington, The Guardian, December 10, 1983, p. 1.

“Windscale beach pollution blunder,” Geoffrey Lean, The Observer, December 11, 1983, p. 2.

“Sellafield faces prosecution over leaks,” New Scientist, December 15, 1983, p. 791.

“Windscale’s pipeline,” Peter Danckwerts, New Scientist, December 15, 1983, p. 883.

“Doctors say ‘spies’ are leaking hospital secrets,” The Guardian, December 16, 1983, p. 2.

“Leukemia questioning vetoed by inspector,” Roger Milne, The Guardian, December 16, 1983, p. 2.

“Mistake led to nuclear waste in sea,” Michael Morris, The Guardian, December 16, 1983, p. 1.

“Valve error caused Sellafield leak,” Ronald Faux, The (London) Times, December 16, 1983, p. 3.

“Radioactive leak case referred to the DPP,” The (London) Times, December 21, 1983, p. 4.

“Radioactive leak at Sellafield may lead to prosecution,” Philip Webster, The (London) Times, December 22, 1983, p. 1.

“Radioactive leak reported to the DPP, Jenkin tells Commons,” The Guardian, December 22, 1983, p. 14.

“Sellafield leak is referred to DPP: Scientists worried by ‘strange’ pattern of sea contamination,” Anthony Tucker, The Guardian, December 22, 1983, p. 1.

“BNFL pays £21,000 in leukemia case,” Michael Morris, The Guardian, December 23, 1983, p. 2.

“Plan to sink waste in seabed,” Paul Keel, The Guardian, December 23, 1983, p. 1.

“A-plants: A hardcore problem in the making,” Barbara von Ow, The (London) Times, December 27, 1983, p. 8.

“Sellafield cancer victims given compensation but liability not admitted,” The (London) Times, January 4, 1984, p. 3.

“BNFL denies ‘cover-up’ claim over Sellafield compensation payments,” Paul Keel, The Guardian, January 5, 1984, p. 2.

“Sellafield claim by MP is rejected,” Ronald Faux, The (London) Times, January 5, 1984, p. 2.

“Whitehall withholds nuclear papers,” Richard Norton-Taylor, The Guardian, January 10, 1984, p. 4.

“Greenpeace may defy Sellafield pipe ban,” John Witherow, The (London) Times, January 14, 1984, p. 3.

“Partial victory for Greenpeace despite ruling,” Penny Chorlton, The Guardian, January 14, 1984, p. 2.

“Sellafield beach risk still very high,” Paul Brown, The Guardian, January 15, 1984, p. 28.

“Cancer inquiry leader will not visit village,” Paul Brown, The Guardian, January 20, 1984, p. 2.

“Radiation leak at top-secret plant,” Thomson Prentice, The (London) Times, January 20, 1984, p. 1.

“Cancer worry at fourth atom plant,” Geoffrey Lean, The Observer, January 22, 1984, p. 7.

“Argument over ‘safe’ radiation,” Anthony Tucker, The Guardian, January 26, 1984, p. 26.

“Deformed babies blamed on Windscale fire,” Roger Milne, New Scientist, January 26, 1984, p. 7.

“Warning of risk to Sellafield children,” Andrew Veitch, The Guardian, January 27, 1984, p. 4.

“Europe’s N-waste may go to Billingham,” Malcolm Wright, The Guardian, January 30, 1984, p. 2.

“Radiation check demanded,” Paul Keel and Michael Morris, The Guardian, February 1, 1984, p. 2.

“Windscale: Backing for leukemia charge,” New Scientist, February 2, 1984, p. 4.

“Sellafield waste traces ‘found under Arctic ice,’” David Fairhall, The Guardian, February 3, 1984, p. 4.

“Cancer patients ‘refused places on waiting lists,’” Penny Chorlton, The Guardian, February 6, 1984, p. 2.

“Ecology groups raided by police over leak,” Richard Norton-Taylor, The Guardian, February 7, 1984, p. 30.

“Profit motive fears over nuclear waste research,” Malcolm Wright, The Guardian, February 10, 1984, p. 2.

“Radioactivity: Polluting suburbs,” Andrew Tyler, New Statesman, February 10, 1984, pp. 10, 12.

“Safety flaws exposed at Windscale,” Geoffrey Lean, The Observer, February 12, 1984, p. 2.

“Sellafield inquiry reports criticize process of removing radioactive refuse,” Ronald Faux, The (London) Times, February 13, 1984, p. 2.

“A disaster that almost happened?” editorial, The Guardian, February 15, 1984, p. 10.

“Errors that let waste into sea,” Paul Brown, The Guardian, February 15, 1984, p. 2.

“Government blames Sellafield chiefs for leak,” Paul Brown and Colin Brown, The Guardian, February 15, 1984, p. 1.

“Nuclear waste reports warn public to avoid Sellafield beaches,” Pearce Wright, The (London) Times, February 15, 1984, p. 2.

“Promises leave the locals unmoved,” Michael Morris, The Guardian, February 15, 1984, p. 2.

“Sellafield controls found wanting,” Paul Brown, The Guardian, February 15, 1984, p. 2.

“Sellafield catalogue of errors,” Pearce Wright, The (London) Times, February 15, 1984, p. 1.

“Fuel for fear,” editorial, The (London) Times, February 16, 1984, p. 13.

“Union stands by Sellafield staff,” Paul Brown, The Guardian, February 16, 1984, p. 3.

“Open verdict on cancer victim contaminated by nuclear leaks,” The Guardian, February 17, 1984, p. 2.

“Dublin demands Sellafield action,” Ian Black, The Guardian, February 18, 1984, p. 28.

“Warnings go up on nuclear site beaches,” Michael Morris, The Guardian, February 18, 1984, p. 3.

“Nuclear Fuels sale at risk,” Robin McKie and Geoffrey Lean, The Observer, February 19, 1984, p. 3.