Most cases of cyclopia are not, however, caused by anything the mother did (or did not do) during her pregnancy. Mutations in at least four and perhaps as many as twelve human genes also cause some form of holoprosencephaly. One of these genes encodes a signalling protein called sonic hedgehog. This molecule received its name in the early 1980s when a mutant fruit fly was discovered whose maggot progeny had a surplus of bristles covering their tiny bodies. ‘Hedgehog’ was the obvious name for the gene, and when a related gene was discovered in vertebrates, ‘sonic hedgehog’ seemed the natural choice to a postgraduate student who perhaps loved his gaming-console too much. The sonic hedgehog mutations that cause cyclopia in humans are dominant. This implies that anyone who has just a single copy of the defective gene should have cyclopia or at least some kind of holoprosencephaly. But for reasons that are poorly understood, some carriers of mutant genes are hardly affected at all. They live, and pass the defective gene on to their children.
The fact that sonic hedgehog-defective infants have a single cerebral hemisphere tells us something important. When the forebrain first forms in the normal embryo it is a unitary thing, a simple bulge at the end of the neural tube – only later does it split into a left and right brain. This split is induced by sonic which, like so many signalling molecules, is a morphogen. During the formation of the neural tube, sonic appears in a small piece of mesoderm directly beneath the developing forebrain. Filtering up from one tissue to the next it cleaves the brain in two. This process is especially obvious in the making of eyes. Long before the embryo has eyes, a region of the forebrain is dedicated to their neural wiring. This region – the optic field – first appears as a single band traversing the embryo forebrain. Sonic moulds the optic field’s topography, reducing it to two smaller fields on either side of the head. Mutations or chemicals that inhibit sonic prevent this – thus the single, monstrous, staring eye of the cyclopic infant.
But sonic does more than give us distinct cerebral hemispheres. Mice in which the sonic hedgehog gene has been completely disabled have malformed hearts, lungs, kidneys and guts. They are always stillborn and have no paws. Their faces are malformed beyond cyclopic, reduced to a strange kind of trunk: they have no eyes, ears or mouths. These malformations suggest that sonic is used throughout the developing embryo, almost anywhere it is growing a part. It even seems to be used repeatedly in the making of our heads.
An embryo’s face is formed from five lumpy prominences that start out distinct, but later fuse with each other. Two of them become the upper jaw, two become the lower jaw, while one in front makes the nose, philtrum and forehead. These five prominences secrete sonic hedgehog protein. Sonic, in turn, controls their growth, and in doing so the geometry of the face. More exactly, it regulates its width. It sets the spaces between our ears, eyes and even our nostrils. We know this because chicken embryos whose faces are dosed with extra sonic protein develop unusually wide faces. If the dose is increased even further their faces become so wide that they start duplicating structures – and end up with two beaks side by side. Something like this also occurs naturally in humans. Several genetic disorders are marked by extremely wide-set eyes, a trait known as hypertelorism. One of these is caused by mutations in a gene that normally limits sonic’s activity. Patients with another hypertelorism syndrome even resemble the sonic-dosed chickens in having very broad noses, or else noses with two tips, or even two noses.
Disorders of this sort prompt the question of just how wide a face can be. If, as a face becomes wider and wider, parts start duplicating, might one not ultimately end up with a completely duplicated face – and so two individuals? It is not an academic question. One San Francisco-born pig arrived in the world with two snouts, two tongues, two oesophagi and three eyes each with an optic stalk of its own. It may have started out as two twin embryos that later conjoined in extraordinary intimacy. But given that the duplication was confined to the face and forebrain it may also have grown from a single primordial embryo, but one with a very wide head. The pig’s head is preserved in a jar at the University of California San Francisco, a suitable object for philosophical reflection. Was it one pig or two? It’s a question that would have stumped Aquinas himself. Not so the scientists who cared for the beast. They ignored the metaphysics, hedged their bets, and dubbed their friend(s) ‘Ditto’.
SIRENS
Among the disorders that appear regularly in the great teratology collections – the Vrolik devotes a whole cabinet to it – is a syndrome called sirenomelia. The name is taken from siren, the creatures that tempted Ulysses, and melia, for limb, but the English name, ‘mermaid syndrome’, is no less evocative. Instead of two good legs, sirenomelic infants have only one lower appendage – a tapering tube that contains a single femur, tibia and fibula. They resemble nothing so much as the fake mermaids concocted by nineteenth-century Japanese fishermen from the desiccated remains of monkeys and fish. More than Homeric echoes link cyclopia and sirenomelia. Just as cyclopia is a disorder of the midline of the face, a failure of its two sides to be sufficiently far apart, so sirenomelia is a failure in the midline of the lower limbs. A sirenomelic infant has neither a left nor a right leg but rather two legs that are somehow fused together.
The causes of sirenomelia are still not entirely known. But recently two groups of scientists independently engineered mouse strains that were defective for a particular gene. Unexpectedly, when the mice were born they had no tails and, just as sirenomelic infants do, fused hind limbs. To all appearances they were mermaid mice.
The mermaid mice were made by deleting the CYP26A1 gene. It encodes an enzyme that regulates a substance called retinoic acid. Most of the important molecules that control the construction of the embryo – that are a part of the genetic grammar – are proteins, long chains of amino acids. Retinoic acid, however, is not. Rather it is a much smaller and simpler sort of molecule, just a hydrocarbon ring with a tail. It is also one of the more mysterious of the embryo’s molecules. Because it is not a protein it has been difficult to study. For one thing, it can’t be seen in the embryo. The special stains that can be used to visualise proteins can’t be used for hydrocarbon rings. And then, because it is not a protein there is no ‘retinoic acid gene’ – no single stretch of DNA that directly encodes the information needed to make it. Instead there are just genes which encode enzymes that manufacture retinoic acid or degrade it – a frustratingly indirect relationship between gene and substance.
Even so, there have long been hints that retinoic acid is important. Embryos manufacture their retinoic acid from vitamin A – the need of which has been clear since 1932, when a sow at a Texas agricultural college that had been fed a vitamin A-deficient diet gave birth to eleven piglets all of which lacked eyeballs. Conversely, the consequences of too much retinoic acid became apparent in the 1980s when a related molecule called isotretinoin was extensively prescribed for severe acne. The drug was taken orally, and though its teratogenic effects were by this time well known some women took it while unwittingly pregnant. In one study of thirty-six such pregnancies, twenty-three superficially normal infants were born, eight ended in miscarriages, and five infants were malformed, their defects including cleft palates, heart defects, disordered central nervous systems and missing ears.