All right, she agreed. As I Just said, though, I think there were physical limitations to its retaining multiple personality structures for a very long period of time. If it did, however, it would have continued with its own, plus replicas of the four operators', at least for a while. The situation would differ radically from that of a human schizoid of this sort, in that the additional personalities were valid images of genuine identities rather than self-generated complexes which had become autonomous. They might continue to evolve, they might degenerate, they might conflict to the point of destruction or gross modification of any or all of them. In other words, no prediction is possible as to the nature of whatever might remain.
Might I venture one?
Go ahead.
After considerable anxiety, it masters them. It asserts itself. It beats down this quartet of demons which has been tearing it apart, acquiring in the process an all-consuming hatred for the actual individuals responsible for this turmoil. To free itself totally, to revenge itself, to work its ultimate catharsis, it resolves to seek them out and destroy them.
She smiled.
You have just dispensed with the 'viable schizophrenia' you conjured up, and you have now switched over to its pulling through and becoming fully autonomous. That is a different situation, no matter what strings you put on it.
Okay, I accept the charge ... But what about my conclusion?
You are saying that if it did pull through, it would hate us. That strikes me as an unfair attempt to invoke the spirit of Sigmund Freud: Oedipus and Electra in one being, out to destroy all its parents, the authors of every one of its tensions, anxieties, hang-ups, burned into its impressionable psyche at a young and defenseless age. Even Freud didn't have a name for that one. What should we call it?
A Hermacis complex? I suggested.
Hermacis?
Hermaphroditus having been united in one body with the nymph Sahnacis, I've just done the same with their names. That being would then have had four parents against whom to react.
Cute, she said, smiling. If the liberal arts do nothing else, they provide engaging metaphors for the thinking they displace. This one is unwarranted and overly anthropomorphic, though ... You wanted my opinion. All right. If the Hangman pulled through at all, it could only have been by virtue of that neuristor brain's differences from the human brain. From my own professional experience, a human could not pass through a situation like that and attain stability. If the Hangman did, it would have to have resolved all the contradictions and conflicts, to have mastered and understood the situation so thoroughly that I do not believe whatever remained could involve that sort of hatred. The fear, the uncertainty, the things that feed hate would have been analyzed, digested, turned to something more useful. There would probably be distaste, and possibly an act of independence, of self-assertion. That was one reason why I suggested its return of the ship.
It is your opinion, then, that if the Hangman exists as a thinking individual today, this is the only possible attitude it would possess toward its former operators: it would want nothing more to do with you?
That is correct. Sorry about your Hermacis complex. But in this case we must look to the brain, not the psyche. And we see two things: schizophrenia would have destroyed it, and a successful resolution of its problem would preclude vengeance. Either way, there is nothing to worry about.
How could I put it tactfully? I decided that I could not.
All of this is fine, I said, for as far as it goes. But getting away from both the purely psychological and the purely physical, could there be a particular reason for its seeking your deaths, that is, a plain old-fashioned motive for a killing, based on events rather than having to do with the way its thinking equipment goes together?
Her expression was impossible to read, but considering her line of work I had expected nothing less.
What events? she said.
I have no idea. That's why I asked.
She shook her head.
I'm afraid that I don't, either.
Then that about does it, I said. I can't think of anything else to ask you.
She nodded.
And I can't think of anything else to tell you. I finished my coffee, returned the cup to the tray.
Thanks, then, I said, for your time, for the coffee.
You have been very helpful. I rose. She did the same.
What are you going to do now? she asked. I haven't quite decided, I answered. I want to do the best report I can. Have you any suggestions on that?
I suggest that there isn't any more to learn, that I have given you the only possible constructions the facts warrant.
You don't feel David Fentris could provide any additional insights?
She snorted, then sighed.
No, she said, I do not think he could tell you anything useful.
What do you mean? From the way you say it ...
I know. I didn't mean to ... Some people find comfort in religion. Others ... You know. Others take it up late in life with a vengeance and a half. They don't use it quite the way it was intended. It comes to color all their thinking.
Fanaticism? I said.
Not exactly. A misplaced zeal. A masochistic sort of thing. Hell! I shouldn't be diagnosing at a distance, or influencing your opinion. Forget what I said. Form your own opinion when you meet him.
She raised her head, appraising my reaction. Well, I responded, I am not at all certain that I am going to see him. But you have made me curious. How can religion influence engineering?
I spoke with him after Jesse gave us the news on the vessel's return. I got the impression at the time that he feels we were tampering in the province of the Almighty by attempting the creation of an artificial intelligence. That our creation should go mad was only appropriate, being the work of imperfect man. He seemed to feel that it would be fitting if it had come back for retribution, as a sign of judgment upon us.
Oh, I said. She smiled then. I returned it.
Yes, she said, but maybe I just got him in a bad mood. Maybe you should go see for yourself.
Something told me to shake my head, there was a bit of a difference between this view of him, my recollections, and Don's comment that Dave had said he knew its brain and was not especially concerned. Somewhere among these lay something I felt I should know, felt I should learn without seeming to pursue.
So, I think have enough right now, I said. It was the psychological side of things I was supposed to cover, not the mechanical, or the theological. You have been extremely helpful. Thanks again.
She carried her smile all the way to the door. *'If it is not too much trouble, she said, as I stepped into the hall, I would like to learn how this whole thing finally turns out, or any interesting developments, for that matter.
My connection with the case ends with this report, and I am going to write it now. Still, I may get some feedback.
You have my number ... ?
Probably, but ...
I already had it, but I jotted it again, right after Mrs. Gluntz's answers to my inquiries on detergents.
Moving in a rigorous line, I made beautiful connections, for a change. I headed directly for the airport, found a flight aimed at Memphis, bought passage, and was the last to board. Ten score seconds, perhaps, made all the difference. Not even a tick or two to spare for checking out of the motel ... No matter. The good head-doctor had convinced me that, like it or not, David Fentris was next, damn it. I had too strong a feeling that Leila Thackery had not told me the entire story. I had to take a chance, to see these changes in the man for myself, to try to figure out how they related to the Hangman. For a number of reasons, I'd a feeling they might.