Virgil took the poets hand and led him down a path. Soon the poet could smell, as they approached a barrier of rocks and shrubs, the scent of the finely cooked stew. Mingled with the smells, however, were the eerie sounds of wailing and the gnashing of teeth. As they rounded the rocks they came upon an unusual sight. There was a large clearing in which were situated a number of huge round tables. In the middle of each table was an enormous bowl of the stew the poet had smelled and around each table were scores of emaciated and obviously hungry people. Each person held a spoon which they were using in an attempt to eat the stew. Because the table was so large, however, and the spoons had to be made so long in order to reach the bowl in the middle, the handles of the spoons were twice as long as the arms of the people using them. This made it impossible for any of the hungry people to put food in their mouths. There was much fighting and cursing
as each person tried desperately to get even a dribble of the stew.
The poet was so moved by the terrible sight that he finally hid his eyes and begged Virgil to take him away. In a moment they were back on the boat and Virgil instructed the poet which way to row to get to heaven. When they arrived the poet was again surprised to find that the scene did not fit his expectations. This land was almost exactly like the one they had just left. There were no great pearl gates nor bands of singing angels. Again Virgil led the poet down a path where the smell of food eminated from behind a barrier of rocks and shrubs. This time, however, they heard song and laughter as they approached. When they rounded the barrier the poet was much surprised to find a set–up identical to the one they had just left; large tables surrounded by people with oversized spoons and a large bowl of stew in the center of each table. The one essential difference between this group of people and the one they had just left, however, was that the people in this group were using their spoons to feed each other.
Although there are a number of morals that may be drawn from this parable, it is essentially an example of how one group of people were able to turn what was an environmental variable for another group of people into a decision variable. It demonstrates that what is important in achieving an outcome is not so much what resources are available but how those resources are utilized. It is the process of how resources may be utilized that will be examined in this chapter.
4. Utilization
Utilization may usefully be described as the process of applying an existing strategy, one that you have elicited, for the purpose of assisting a client (individual, family, group or organization) in achieving some desired outcome, or in securing some outcome for yourself. Using this process, the NLP practitioner assists clients by running new content through the formal representational sequence of an existing strategy by packaging or repackaging the client's experience in terms of the existing structure of that strategy. One of the major difficulties that people of all backgrounds and disciplines have in transforming the portions of experience with which they are confronted from the class of environmental variables to the class of decision variables, is that they have no explicit way of applying strategies and resources that they have used to successfully complete this transformation in past contexts, to the ongoing situations with which they are confronted. The process of utilization provides an explicit operation for making this transformation.
4.1 Form vs. Content.
The power and usefulness of strategies lies in the the fact that they are descriptions of the purely formal operations of our behavior and are not tied to any particular experiential content. As we mentioned earlier, the same strategy people use to motivate themselves to get out of bed in the morning may be utilized to motivate them to work more efficiently, to learn something new, to go jogging, to sign an agreement or even to buy a car. Our strategies provide the frameworks within which we incorporate and interpret the content of our sensory experience.
The behavioral significance of any particular experience we encounter — that is, whether it becomes a resource or an obstacle, a decision variable or an environmental variable — is totally dependent on how we utilize it within the strategies and operations we have available to us; we can choose to transform our obstacles into resources, as in the case of the waterfalls or the bread mold mentioned in the introduction. A particular content fact, is of no use to us unless we can process it through a strategy to achieve some outcome. Having the part we need to fix our car is useless to us if we don't know what to do with it.
Any past or future experience can serve either as a block or a resource, depending on how you make use of it through your strategies. Whether learning or coping comes to you with ease or with difficulty, or is rapid or laborious for you, is determined by the formal frameworks provided by your strategies.
By paying attention to context and by packaging experience in terms of the most appropriate and resourceful strategies for each situation, anyone can greatly expand their repertoire of choices and behaviors.
4.2 Pacing Strategies.
Our primary means of utilizing a strategy is through packaging and presenting the content of the situation or task in question in such way as to pace the steps and sequence of an appropriate strategy that we've elicited from a client. The process of pacing, first introduced in Patterns I, has been an extremely important part of all of the work we have done.
Pacing is the process of feeding back to a client, through your own behavior, the behaviors and strategies that you have observed in them — that is, by going to their model of the world. You will have successfully paced a person's strategy when you have packaged the information which you are working with (whether it is mathematical formulas, how to work camera equipment, making fiscal policy, information about some product you want to market, a personal problem the individual has, etc.) such that the form of your presentation matches, step for step, the sequence of representations the person cycles through in that strategy.
For example, consider the following strategy for decision making:
This is a fairly simple decision strategy. The initial gathering of information involves looking at the possibilities (V). This information is then discussed or described verbally through internal dialogue, or the individual recalls verbal information (Aid) concerning what s/he sees. This is then tested (against other remembered dialogues) and the results are represented through a kinesthetic (Ki) response — through the person's feelings about what s/he hears or says inside his or her head. If the feelings are congruent with the words (that is, if they are definitely positive or negative) the individual will decide either for or against acting on the experience that has been proposed. If the feelings indicate an incongruence about the action the individual will operate by looking again at the situation, or perhaps by looking for alternatives (V), and the strategy will repeat itself. Note that we leave oft" the superscript of the V component of the decision making strategy — if the possibility(s) or alternative(s) to be decided among can be displayed easily externally (e.g. deciding three types of carpets — all available inside the store), then the superscript will be Ve. If the possibility(s) or alternative(s) is difficult to display externally, the formulation would be Vi.