“You didn’t believe him?”
She shrugged and put her hand on a pedestal table, letting her posture relax. “You’re an attractive young woman. Gabriel isn’t usually blinded by such things, but it is possible, combined with the equally blinding attractions of a healthy bank account and an intriguing back story.”
“So you were … what? Seeing if you could bully the money out of me?”
“It was worth a try. He worked for that money, and he deserves it. I understand why you don’t want to go to your adoptive family for it, but I think you’re a fool for rejecting the book income. Pamela Larsen is your mother. You’ve been damaged by that. You will be damaged more. I don’t need the second sight to foresee that. Maybe you’ll change your mind. In the meantime…” She waved toward an open doorway. “A reading.”
“I’m not—”
“It’s on the house.”
“Right. Let me guess. My future will be so much brighter if I paid my mother’s bills.”
A harsh croak of a laugh. “That would be insultingly obvious.”
She headed into the side room. I followed. Once I crossed the threshold, I stopped to stare. To the layperson’s eye it might look like a cheesy fortune-teller’s room, but to anyone who knew something about the history of spiritualism, it was like stepping into a museum exhibit.
I stopped in front of a very old reproduction of a photograph, showing what looked like tiny, gauzy-winged people in the grass.
“The Cottingley Fairies,” I murmured.
Five photographs taken in 1917, probably the most famous “evidence” of fairies. Four were of two girls playing with little winged people. This was the fifth, without the girls. The photos were a huge sensation at the time and were taken as proof of the existence of the little people. It wasn’t until the eighties that the girls admitted they’d faked the first four photographs using cutouts of fairies from a book. On this fifth one, though, they disagreed, one claiming it was another fake and the other insisting it was real.
How did I know this? Because the best-known article written on the Cottingley fairies was by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, published in a Christmas edition of the Strand. He’d been convinced they were real. That had been the actual subject of my master’s thesis—a reanalysis of his ultralogical famous detective in light of Conan Doyle’s interest in the otherworldly.
“It looks real, doesn’t it?” Rosalyn said.
“It’s a double-negative. That’s the theory anyway. The girls shot a photo of the cardboard fairies and got a double-negative of the images.”
Another croaked laugh. “You have a very firm opinion on the subject, don’t you?”
“I do. I could tell you my opinion of fortune-telling, too.” I turned. “I’ll warn you, prognostication is wasted on me. I had my palm read once, on a lark with friends. The psychic told me I’d marry a handsome, rich man.”
“Which you were going to, were you not?”
“Past tense. Meaning it was wrong, though I’m sure if I pointed that out, she’d say there’s still time. Even if I married two ugly, poor men in a row, she could tell me there was still time.”
“It was a reasonable guess, though. She could tell you come from money. Even today, you may think you’re hiding behind department store attire, but you’re wearing a Cartier watch. Besides, a trained ear can pick up the softened midwestern accent that suggests private school. If you come from those circles, it is likely your husband will be wealthy.”
“And handsome?”
“Beautiful women sometimes choose unattractive men to move up on the social ladder. Again, you don’t need that. So it is a reasonable guess you will marry a man who is both wealthy and handsome.”
“She also said I’ll have two children.”
Rosalyn settled into a chair at the table and motioned for me to do the same. “There she was wrong. Or relying on outdated information. The current national average is less than two. Higher socioeconomic status often results in fewer children. Based on that alone, I’d have said one. However, in your case, I’d say none.”
“Because I won’t want to pass on my tainted serial-killer genes?”
“No, because you don’t like children.”
When I started to protest, she continued, “Perhaps that’s too harsh. You don’t dislike them. But to you, they are like parrots. Pretty to look at, fun to play with, but you wouldn’t want to be saddled with that responsibility for the rest of your life.”
“That’s a big leap to make for someone you just met.”
“Not really. I don’t know who broke the engagement, you or James Morgan. The papers say he did. I suspect it was you. Pride, most likely. Either way, had you been eager to start a family, you would have tried to work it out. Also, you don’t strike me as being particularly maternal. So I would have said no children is most likely, though I would hedge my bets by adding that there is the possibility of one later in life. What else did your fortune-teller say?”
I shrugged. “More of the same. Things she thought I wanted to hear or things she could guess. A mix of fantasy and truth.”
“For psychics like that, it’s a con job. Anyone willing to learn to read the signs can do it.”
“Not exactly a good promotion of your services, Ms. Razvan.”
“It’s Walsh. Rose Walsh. Rosalyn Razvan is my professional name. In this business, people want a gypsy, not a fourth-generation Irish immigrant. You can call me Rose. As for admitting to chicanery, I was referring to psychics like the one you visited. I have the sight. I can see the futures.”
“Futures? Plural?”
“Of course. That’s the problem with most theories of prognostication. They presume a single future. You will marry a handsome, rich man and have two children. Is life so predetermined from birth to death, like a car on a fixed track, no room for detours, no allowance for free will? There are futures, Olivia. Possible outcomes based on choices. My gift is not the ability to predict you will marry a handsome, rich man, but to say, if you marry this particular handsome, rich man you will live a comfortable but constrained life. If you do not, your life will be fuller, but you will look back with regret. The choice, then, is yours.”
“More life coach than fortune-teller.”
“Yes, and I will pretend I didn’t notice the sarcasm in your tone.” She took a deck of well-worn tarot cards and fanned them before me.
“Choose.”
I slid one out, still upside down.
“Now turn it over.”
I did. It was a gorgeously rendered Victorian-era card showing a circus clown balancing on a ball, surrounded by dogs with tiny hats.
“The fool,” I murmured. “I’m afraid to ask what that means.”
“That’s not how this works. I don’t interpret the card. You do. When you first saw it, your reaction was dismay.”
“I didn’t mean—”
“You’re afraid of being played for a fool. Take another.”
I shook my head.
“Too revealing?” she said. “You’re uncomfortable sharing emotional reactions.”
“No, I just—”
“You are.” She scooped up the cards. “Now take another.”
I did.
A half hour later, Rose said, “I believe our time is almost up.” She pulled a cell phone from her pocket and checked it. “Yes, my next appointment will be here soon.”
“So where’s my reading? Oh, wait. I have to pay for that, right?”
“I already did the reading. I read you. Now you need to ask me a question.”
“I don’t have any.”
She met my gaze. “Really? I doubt that, under the circumstances.”
“If you expect me to ask whether Pamela and Todd Larsen are really serial killers, I’m not going to.”