Выбрать главу

put into them by male relatives who hate them for rebelling

against the limits of the female role, or against the conditions

of female servitude. They will not empty prisons filled with

women who, in order to survive, whored; or who, after being

raped, killed the rapist; or who, while being beaten, killed the

man who was killing them. These reforms will not stop men

from living off exploited female domestic labor, nor will these

reforms stop men from reinforcing male identity by psychologically victimizing women in so-called “love” relationships.

And no personal accommodation within the system of

patriarchy will stop this relentless gynocide. Under patriarchy,

no woman is safe to live her life, or to love, or to mother

children. Under patriarchy, every woman is a victim, past,

present, and future. Under patriarchy, every woman’s daughter is a victim, past, present, and future. Under patriarchy, every woman’s son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman.

Before we can live and love, we will have to hone ourselves

into a revolutionary sisterhood. That means that we must stop

supporting the men who oppress us; that we must refuse to

feed and clothe and clean up after them; that we must refuse

to let them take their sustenance from our lives. That means

that we will have to divest ourselves of the identity we have

been trained to as females—that we will have to divest ourselves of all traces of the masochism we have been told is synonymous with being female. That means that we will have

to attack and destroy every institution, law, philosophy, religion, custom, and habit of this patriarchy—this patriarchy that feeds on our “dirty” blood, that is built on our “trivial”

labor.

Halloween is the appropriate time to commit ourselves to

this revolutionary sisterhood. On this night we remember our

dead. On this night we remember together that nine million

women were killed because men said that they were carnal,

malicious, and wicked. On this night we know that they live

now through us.

Let us together rename this night Witches’ Eve. Let us together make it a time of mourning: for all women who are victims of gynocide, dead, in jail, in mental institutions, raped,

sterilized against their wills, brutalized. And let us on this

night consecrate our lives to developing the revolutionary

sisterhood— the political strategies, the feminist actions—

which will stop for all time the devastating violence against

us.

4

The Rape A tro city

and the Boy N ext Door

I want to talk to you about rape— rape—what it is, who does

it, to whom it is done, how it is done, why it is done, and what

to do about it so that it will not be done any more.

First, though, I want to make a few introductory remarks. *

From 1964 to 1965 and from 1966 to 1968, I went to Bennington College in Vermont. Bennington at that time was still a women’s school, or, as people said then, a girls’ school. It

was a very insular place—entirely isolated from the Vermont

Delivered at State University of New York at Stony Brook, March 1, 1975;

University of Pennsylvania, April 25, 1975; State University of New York

College at Old Westbury, May 10, 1975; Womanbooks, New York City,

July 1, 1975; Woodstock Women's Center, Woodstock, New York, July 3,

1975; Suffolk County Community College, October 9, 1975; Queens College,

City University of New York, April 2 6 , 1976.

*

These introductory remarks were delivered only at schools where there

was no women’s studies program.

community in which it was situated, exclusive, expensive.

There was a small student body highly concentrated in the

arts, a low student-faculty ratio, and an apocryphal tradition

of intellectual and sexual “freedom. ” In general, Bennington

was a very distressing kind of playpen where wealthy young

women were educated to various accomplishments which

would insure good marriages for the respectable and good

affairs for the bohemians. At that time, there was more actual

freedom for women at Bennington than at most schools— in

general, we could come and go as we liked, whereas most

other schools had rigid curfews and controls; and in general

we could wear what we wanted, whereas in most other schools

women still had to conform to rigid dress codes. We were

encouraged to read and write and make pots, and in general

to take ourselves seriously, even though the faculty did not

take us seriously at all. Being better educated to reality than

we were, they, the faculty, knew what we did not imagine—

that most of us would take our highfalutin ideas about James

and Joyce and Homer and invest them in marriages and volunteer work. Most of us, as the mostly male faculty knew, would fall by the wayside into silence and all our good intentions and vast enthusiasms had nothing to do with what would happen to us once we left that insulated playpen. At the time I

went to Bennington, there was no feminist consciousness there

or anywhere else at all. Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique concerned housewives— we thought that it had nothing to do with us. Kate Millett’s Sexual Politics was not yet published. Shulamith Firestone’s The Dialectic of Sex was not yet published. We were in the process of becoming very well-educated women— we were already very privileged women—

and yet not many of us had ever heard the story of the movement for women’s suffrage in this country or Europe. In the Amerikan history courses I took, women’s suffrage was not

mentioned. The names of Angelina and Sarah Grimke, or

Susan B. Anthony, or Elizabeth Cady Stanton, were never

mentioned. Our ignorance was so complete that we did not

know that we had been consigned from birth to that living

legal and social death called marriage. We imagined, in our

ignorance, that we might be novelists and philosophers. A rare

few among us even aspired to be mathematicians and biologists. We did not know that our professors had a system of beliefs and convictions that designated us as an inferior gender

class, and that that system of beliefs and convictions was virtually universal—the cherished assumption of most of the writers, philosophers, and historians we were so ardently

studying. We did not know, for instance, to pick an obvious