At the campus, a complex of half a dozen small, square, brick buildings that from the outside resembled a munitions plant, we met Hamilton’s daughter, Rochelle, he for the first time since she was an infant, me for the first time ever. As we got out of his car — he was driving an air-conditioned, dark brown Cadillac Coupe de Ville at that time, quite luxurious — I asked him if Rochelle knew he was coming. He grunted that in response to her invitation he had sent her a post card so indicating.
“Is this the first time you will have seen her since she was an infant?” I asked him.
Again he grunted his answer, which was yes. I could tell from his grunts that he was somewhat tense and possibly even a bit frightened of the occasion. One could hardly blame him. I’m sure that, although he never mentioned it, her acceptance of him was fully as important to him as his acceptance of her was to Rochelle. What if she saw him and, flooded with memories of her mother’s angry descriptions of the man, said to him, “No, I have changed my mind, I don’t want you here, I don’t want you to come to my graduation!” Would he try to comfort her, try to convince her that he truly wanted to be there, reassuring her with his kind, soft and urgent words? Or would he simply spin on his heels and walk away, back to his car, and go home?
Luckily, when Rochelle came up to him and introduced herself, saying that she recognized him from snapshots her mother had shown her, he smiled graciously — one of the few times, perhaps the only time, I’ve seen Hamilton Stark smile graciously — and he took her hand in his and thanked her for inviting him. Rochelle was already six feet tall, a young woman with electrifying beauty, and as she stood there in the parking lot outside the auditorium in her royal blue gown and mortarboard, her hand in her father’s hand, her green eyes staring directly, searchingly, into his brown eyes, which were squinting from the bright sunlight, I felt tears running over and down my cheeks.
Though she and I barely spoke, except for the moment when Hamilton introduced us to one another, it seemed to me then, and was later confirmed by her own testimony, that we both felt a deep bond between us. Years later, six, to be exact, I was able to ask her about that first meeting at Ausable Chasm, to ask her how she had perceived me then. We were lying in bed together, drifting languidly from passionate peaks through hazy valleys all the way to the gray light of dawn, the time of night and first intimacy when lovers ask one another how they were seen before, when they were not lovers. It’s an ancient form of talk, one of the few reliable ways of finding out how one actually is in the world.
I lit a cigarette for her and, naked except for my socks and garters, walked across the room to the dresser — we were at my home, in my own bedroom, this the conclusion to an evening that had begun as a literary discussion on the subject of the modern novel — and fixed her a drink, cognac and soda. “Tell me,” I said to her, returning to the bed with her drink, “on that day we first met, your college graduation day, the day you told me about your father’s wanting to go to college and how he had failed to satisfy that desire and how that was all tied up with your desire to attend Ausable Chasm — on that first day, how did you see me? How did I seem to you? Can you remember?” I asked, handing her the glass. “You don’t mind telling me this, do you?” I asked, suddenly worried that I might have embarrassed her with my question. I still did not know how to anticipate her reactions to anything I might say or do, nor do I even today. She is more intelligent than I, but her thought sequences are linked in patterns and systems that are not as logical as mine, and consequently she is unpredictable to me. Excitingly so, however! I find myself enlarged, enriched, and challenged by her unpredictability. She accomplishes it, expresses it, in our relationship in such a way that it never makes me feel arrogant or humiliated (the two most conventional responses in a male to a female’s unpredictability).
“No,” she said in her low, early morning voice, “I don’t mind.” She was tired, I knew, as was I, but we were both nonetheless stimulated by the occasion. It produced in her a kind of languid animation that, whenever it appeared, made me want to make love to her again. But I resisted the impulse and attended her words.
“I saw you immediately as an ally,” she told me. “I looked into your face and watched how you watched my father. I knew then that you were probably the only other person on earth who was obsessed with him in a way that corresponded to my own obsession with him.” Then she stopped a second. “But you don’t want to hear about my use for you, do you? I mean, after all, as an ally you were useful to me. You were going to become a way for me both to justify and satisfy my obsession with my father. I did have other perceptions of you, perceptions that had nothing to do with any possible use I might make of you. Wouldn’t you rather hear those?” she gently asked me.
Indeed. I had an erection to cope with now. The milky light of dawn was entering the room like a thief, stealing the nighttime and our disembodied, anonymous voices, thrusting us back into our particular, constraining bodies, those vessels, those jugs, those ridiculous, pajama-shaped symbols of our true identities. (I believe this, I have always believed it. I have never regarded myself as anything more than my disembodied voice and have never thought of myself as more clearly seen, known, than when I am heard. This, of course, lies behind my need to pursue and understand Hamilton Stark — at least it’s what presents me with a rationale for my pursuit — for he is the only human being I have known who did not seem to exist solely through his disembodied voice.)
That day at Ausable Chasm College of Arts and Science, though, I almost gave up on Hamilton. I came closest then to believing that the entire view I held of him was nothing more than an objectification of my own psychological and philosophical needs. For the first time, and, I hope, the last, I seriously entertained the notion that I had, in essence, made up Hamilton Stark, had invented him, had taken an ordinary man with an unusual personality disorder and had structured his numerous symptoms into an image that satisfied a set of secret, shameful needs in me.
My true weaknesses always seem to derive from my sympathies. Hamilton has told me this, and it’s true. You will recall my sympathy for his second wife, the one he called “the actress,” and how my sympathy for her made me question his very authenticity. Well, the same thing happened, only in a more extreme fashion, that day when I first met Rochelle, discovered that she was giving the valedictory speech, saw her reaching out for her father’s love and part of his life, and saw him yank both back. I was horrified. This was going too far, I thought. Surely, cruelty has its metaphysical use and meaning, but there must be a point where it is simply and purely cruelty and has no use or meaning except for the perpetrator.
“I’m glad you came,” she said to him in a voice that, to me, seemed remarkably calm.
He squinted into the sun and, expressionless, said that he had come to hear Ezra Taft Benson speak, a privilege that heretofore he had been denied.
Rochelle asked him if he understood Latin.
He shook his head no and asked, surprised, if Benson were going to speak in Latin.
“No, not that I know of,” she said, smiling easily. “But I am. Would you like a translation of my speech?” she asked him coyly. “I’ve copied it out for you.”
Again he shook his head no.
The half-hour that followed was extremely strained. The three of us strolled around the parking lot, Hamilton in the middle, Rochelle on one side, and me on the other. We looked at the automobiles, commented on the makes and the number plates, and asked one another questions that could not be answered. At least not by any of us.