The study of reptiles (the researching of the aviary origins of the blindworm in particular) have led Professor Baruglio to take a closer interest in paleontology-a small demonstration of his general competence in this field: to reconstruct hour by hour the schedule of a tyrannosaurus, all he has to do is take a look at its fossilized footprint, preserved by some miracle, since that muddy morning of the secondary era when the monster, rudely awakened, did not himself know what he would do with his day. But in the absence of even the barest hint of a trail, the most meagre trace, Baruglio’s enquiry is stuck, is at the mercy of the winds. Palafox left no prehistoric traces, or he erased them, or bad weather did, glacial erosion perhaps accountable, or why not Aeolian, or fluvial, or we could inadvertently attribute them to some animal already on file, present at the same times at the same places or somewhat earlier or long after, or long before or a little after. It would have been too terrific to find his fossilized shell in the rock like those of numerous other cephalopods. (In the interest of those who have seen an ammonite, take rapid note that they would be wrong to bother seeing a second. Save for variations of weight and diameter, nothing differentiates one from the next. Their discovery dates back to an ancient era and once the initial surprise was past, man’s interest in the whole kit and caboodle diminished exponentially, daily were dug up more examples, leading us to little more than a lot of clutter. It’s with the invention of paper, then the loose sheet that one saw a movement in their favor take shape, initially almost imperceptible, it was born in literary milieus before settling though the lower strata of society. The ammonite became indispensable to man the day he understood its raison d’être and made corresponding use of it. He had lost interest in it before, as he would have if clothespins had existed in nature, in the rough, until the invention of fabric, at which point the clothespin would have been a runaway success, thus the ammonite remains today, despite the competition of Plexiglas cubes and varnished pebbles, the paperweights most prized by people of taste-a position of trust already ostensibly coveted by young mollusks that barely find use as rubber bands, but time is on their side, time passes.)
As you have already noted, a great many of the rock paintings (blood and ash, brown ochre) dated to the middle-Magdalenian era, represent a humped quadruped, with back-curving horns, of which the curved neckline of wooly fur recalls that belonging to Palafox. Let us not rush to conclude the image is in fact of him. Drawn in the shadowy discomfort of a rocky wall, these approximate figures, clumsy, frequently unfinished, suggest a great many other animals, such as the bison. Above all, what do we know of the artistic conceptions of the troglodytic painters? Why, for example, wouldn’t they have left their imaginations run free and invent this ruminant from scratch? Let us not expect an answer from Baruglio. These men and their rituals have become foreign to us. The generation gap — widened and flooded in zoos to keep monkeys or Lemuroid from sneaking into the company of visitors — this famous trench seems deeper still, and more unbridgeable, which keeps us from the carcasses and other fine remains of our direct ancestors. All one need do is show their gently prognathous skulls to a contemporary to judge, and listen as their laughter overflows.
Now immobilized, head held low, masticating hay, Palafox seems indifferent to everything said around him. He makes no move to exculpate himself. In fact, he conducts himself as if he were convinced of the inutility of the least effort, as if the executioner had already hoisted his cleaver, lowered it, and was now walking away at dawn in search of other thrilling adventures, other unbalanced encounters, other temporary liaisons. It is true, once again, that everything points to him, his ferocity, his omnivorousness, his claws sharper than canines, his canines like sabers, his coat clotted with blood. Scientifically, declaims Pierpont in staccato syllables (he polishes each and joins one carefully to the next), we must prove sci-en-tif-i-cal-ly the innocence or the guilt of Palafox and therefore, in the first place, go back and consider the entirety of his life, search backward for the moment of his birth. We can do this. The lengths of his tusks, the wear and tear on his hooves, his song, the position of his ears at rest, the suppleness of his spine, the size and number of his tines and antlers, we have enough information to succeed. But would it not be faster to have recourse to the techniques commonly utilized to date relics? Zeiger envisions for example the partial dissolution or perhaps irradiation of Palafox. Thanks to this last method, the historian knows instantly where, in which Greek or Inca dresser, to arrange the exhumed plate with a fistful of gold pieces — an archeological discovery then, but also a fine symbol of an earth at once nurturing and nurtured, let it be noted. There are many other methods of dating more or less along the lines of those already mentioned. Push a fisherman into the water and count the circles that expand around the place he fell, you will learn the age of the river.
Or the age of the fisherman, opinions differ on this point, but at root this changes nothing for us, proclaims Baruglio who suggests that we could count, rather than Palafox’s antlers, the concentric circles of the green and red scales of his carapace. Because the antlers mislead — you admit along with me that the stag wears no hat, and yet look at where we all threw ours when we came in. And Baruglio points out, hung on the wall, the varnished antlers of a ten-point buck. Antlers mislead, here’s why, they break in battle, stop growing and multiplying after ten years and never produce more than stolen fruit. You just can’t trust them. Nor the ridges on the shells, Pierpont objects. While quite clear during the early years, very deep and numerous, they become erased through time. After half a century, any carapace will appear perfectly smooth, flawless, as polished as our skulls, Messieurs, which may as well be compared to billiard balls, to staircase finials and pommels, in the best of cases to the knees of actresses. (From that time on we better understood why Madame Fontechevade had finally thrown her tortoise Tatiana out a window. While her own face wrinkled, Tatiana’s shell grew smoother with time, and as a result of inverted evolutionary trajectories there reached a point where they criss-crossed and each exhibited an identical state of dilapidation, from which a chain-reaction of comical mistaken identity arose, and what was bound to happen did, and one day Tatiana was taken for a younger sister of our old, vexed, terribly vexed, friend.)
According to the spot where Sadarnac had caught him, in the very center of the Sargasso sea, it is likely that Palafox followed the migratory route, gulping down unrelentingly, and without deviating from his route, the offspring of sardines and anchovies and herrings which really hit the spot, here as elsewhere, when tasty little dishes won’t do. This established, continues Cambrelin, the problem remains undiminished as we have no idea in which direction Palafox swam. Did he return to spawning-grounds, a vigorous adult at the peak of his prowess, or, just out of the egg, did he take to the open sea for the first time? In fact, we would be no more enlightened about his age if we were to illuminate this mystery. The eel, for example, undulates with the river until it reaches the delta, making its way down the warm currents to reproduce in the sea, while the salmon, counter-exemplary, abandons the sea, making its way up the icy stream and lays its twenty five thousand eggs beneath the stones of a calm river bordered by willow and alder or aspen. It is in this manner that the returning salmon journeys accompanied by the young eel and the young salmon accompanied by the mature eel. Was Palafox born in saltwater, in which case the vigorous adult at the peak of his powers when Sadarnac caught him, on his way to spawn in fresh water? Or was Palafox born in fresh water, fresh out of the egg when Sadarnac caught him, heading out for the first time to the open sea? Really, this is the only point that demands clarification.