The chief counsel began questioning Dan about the solar power satellite. Dan had already set up a video presentation and for the next ten minutes the computer graphics played their animated scenes on the big high-definition screen that hung on the wall of the hearing chamber opposite the TV crews.
Once the video ended, the lawyer said, “This subcommittee has heard testimony to the effect that the microwave beam coming from the satellite to the ground is environmentally dangerous.”
Dan nodded. “Testimony from Rick Chatham and his people, I know.”
“What is your response to their assertions?”
“Are any of his assertions backed by scientific evidence?” Dan asked, with a patient smile on his face. “Does Chatham have any expertise in climatology, or radiology, or any other -ology?”
Dan heard a few titters behind him.
“Can anyone in his group program a kitchen appliance without asking some teenager for help?”
Laughter, even among some of the senators.
But the lawyer frowned and repeated, “What is your response, sir, to these assertions?”
Putting on a serious expression, Dan said, “Sir, we have done several scientific studies of the effects of beaming those microwaves through the atmosphere. I have provided the subcommittee with the relevant reports.”
Before the chief counsel could respond, Dan added, “The long and short of it is that we keep the beam so diffuse that birds can fly through it without harm. Cattle can graze on the ground where the antennas receive the microwave energy. We know the numbers and we have added a safety factor of one hundred percent specifically to make certain that there won’t be any harmful effects.”
Senator Quill broke in: “Your animated video didn’t show how you keep the beam so spread out.”
Wondering if Jane had prompted him to ask that question, Dan said, “Senator, the satellite’s downlink antenna defocuses the beam. The system spreads the beam as it leaves the satellite. If that system should fail, the whole power satellite shuts down automatically.”
“I see,” said Quill, although he looked slightly puzzled.
The other senators began popping questions at Dan, each one of them eager to get their face on camera. Most of the questions were soft. The subcommittee’s on my side, Dan thought. Gradually the questions drifted away from the environmental effects and began to center on the actual operation of the satellite and the spaceplane.
“You’ve had two flights of your spaceplane since the fatal crash last year,” Senator Quill said.
“Three flights, Senator,” Dan replied. “The first one was unmanned. I mean automated.”
“And the more recent two flights?”
“Both were piloted and both were completely successful.”
“What about that first flight, the one that crashed?” asked the senator at the far end of the banquette.
Dan gave his carefully prepared answer. “The FAA and the National Transportation Safety Board have concluded that the accident wasn’t caused by a generic flaw in the spaceplane’s design or manufacture. Our successful flights with the second spaceplane show that the crash was caused by the malfunction of a thrust actuator, which has been corrected.”
“Isn’t the FBI investigating the crash? Isn’t there a possibility that it was caused by sabotage?”
The crowd stirred and reporters began whispering into their phones. Dan suppressed a frown. He had agreed with the FBI people in Houston to keep their investigation hush-hush. Not that they’ve found anything, he reminded himself. But there aren’t any secrets when a U.S. senator wants to get his face on national TV.
Aloud, he answered, “Senator, we just do not know what caused that actuator to fail. Even NASA is stumped by the accident.”
“Was it an act of terrorism?” the senator insisted, looking straight into the TV cameras.
Dan shook his head glumly. “You’ll have to ask the FBI about that, sir.”
More questions, none of them hostile. Finally Quill looked down the table toward Jane. “I invited Senator Thornton to these proceedings because she has introduced legislation that has a bearing on financing high-technology ventures such as yours. Senator Thornton, do you have any questions for this witness?”
Jane sat up a little straighter as Dan thought, I have a question for you, Senator: When am I going to see you again?
“Mr. Randolph,” Jane said, coolly impersonal, “what effect would it have on financing ventures such as yours if the government offered guarantees for long-term, low-interest loans?”
Dan had rehearsed the answer with Jane for a week before this hearing. But only over a videophone link. In the seven months since her surprise visit to Matagorda, Dan had been in the same room with her exactly twice, and both times there had been a crowd separating them. And Scanwell.
Almost automatically, Dan went through their prepared tutorial on financing high-technology ventures.
“There are three factors involved,” he told the subcommittee. “First, high-tech ventures are almost always high risk. In my business, for example, every rocket launch has a considerable amount of risk involved, although we’re reducing those risks quite a bit.”
Quill nodded and Dan got the impression that Jane had already briefed him about this.
“Second,” he went on, “high-tech ventures usually involve a large investment. You can’t build satellites and spacecraft on a shoestring budget.”
“You’re talking billions of dollars?” asked one of the senators.
“Hundreds of millions, at least.”
“What’s the third factor?” Quill prompted.
“Time,” said Dan. “The investor’s money is going to be tied up for a long time, years, maybe a decade or more.”
“Not a ninety-day turnaround,” Jane said with a smile.
“No, not at all,” Dan replied. “If you put all those three factors together—high risk, high investment cost, and a long time before payout—you can see why it’s so difficult to raise investment capital.”
“Would a government guarantee of long-term, low-interest loans be of help?” Jane asked.
“It already has,” Dan said. “Astro Corporation has been working from loans raised in the private sector for the past several months. I’m certain that this legislation you’ve introduced in the Senate has opened that door for us.”
One of the senators quipped, “Well, if it’s worked that well for you, maybe we won’t have to pass the bill.”
A few of the other senators chuckled tolerantly. Jane did not, Dan noticed. He suppressed an urge to snap a snotty answer at the flippant senator.
“Any other questions for this witness?” Quill asked, looking up and down the table. “If not, then the witness is excused.”
“Before I go,” Dan said, “I have a short statement to make, Senators.”
Quill looked down at Dan. “As long as it’s short.”
Dan didn’t quibble with the senator’s choice of words. “I just want to tell you, Senators, that we intend to start beaming power from the satellite in two weeks.”
The hearing room erupted. The cameras all focused on Dan. Reporters flicked open their cell phones and began yammering into them. The senators looked at each other up and down the long banquette while the audience burst into dozens of chattering conversations.
In the midst of it all Rick Chatham leaped to his feet, ponytail flying, and shouted, “You can’t do that! I’ll get a court injunction!”
Quill began tapping on the wooden block in front of him, harder and harder, the impatience on his face morphing into red-faced anger. But it did no good. The reporters swarmed around Dan yelling questions at him. Vicki Lee was among them, but Dan looked past them all to search for Jane. Her chair was empty. She had already left.