This victory appeared to give the CIA confidence, and as many as forty Hellfire missiles were fired by the agency’s drones by mid-November 2001. Although the CIA worked closely with the Pentagon during the campaign, on several occasions Air Force officials monitoring Afghanistan noticed explosions and belatedly came to realize that they were caused by CIA drones hitting various targets in the country without informing them.25 In this regard it should also be stated that the CIA was not the only organization deploying drones over Afghanistan during Operation Enduring Freedom. The U.S. Air Force had its own Predators, which were initially piloted remotely from Creech and Nellis Air Bases outside of Las Vegas, Nevada. (Air Force drones would later be flown out of Fargo, Holloman, March, Hector, Davis-Monthan, Beale, Ellington, Ellsworth, Fort Drum, Whiteman, Cannon, Eglin, Cannon and Hancock Airfields as well.) For their part, the CIA drones were controlled from Langley Air Base, 150 miles south of Washington, DC, and sent their remote images to the Global Response Center, on the sixth floor of CIA Headquarters in Langley.26 The CIA drone campaign was run by the CIA Counterterrorism Center’s Pakistan-Afghanistan Department.
Although the CIA and the Pentagon had clashed before 9/11 over who would pay for and utilize the drones, they appeared to have created synergy during Operation Enduring Freedom. Never was this better demonstrated than in March 2002’s Operation Anaconda. This operation followed the capture of the southern capital of the Taliban, Kandahar, in December 2001. With the capture of Kandahar by opposition Pashtun tribal leader Hamid Karzai, the Taliban regime collapsed. Unable to control even the Pashtun tribal lands, most “village Taliban” returned to their homes while the hardcore Taliban fled across the border into the Pashtun tribal lands in Pakistan’s FATA. There they received sanctuary in Bajaur Agency and North and South Waziristan in particular.
But a group of several hundred Arab al Qaeda fighters and Taliban members decided to resist the Americans from a remote Afghan mountain enclave near the Pakistani border at a place called Shah i Kot. In March 2002 the United States launched Operation Anaconda, an airborne assault to try flushing out the enemy in this area. The Americans who landed in Chinook helicopters were ambushed soon after arriving in the mountains and began to take casualties. One U.S. helicopter was downed, and its crew fought to survive the withering fire from the ambushers who were shooting at them from a nearby bunker. In desperation the U.S. troops called for air support to suppress enemy machine-gun fire coming from a ridge known as Takur Ghar. U.S. F-15s and F-16s were sent to save the team, and they attempted to take out the enemy bunker using cannon fire and bombs. But the supersonic jets that were screeching overhead at almost six hundred miles per hour could not be “walked to the target” via radio by the encircled team on the ground. The F-15s almost bombed the entrapped Americans by accident, and so their runs were called off for fear of killing their own men with clumsy five-hundred-pound bombs.
At this time a CIA Predator drone was hurriedly sent to the scene. The drone’s cameras captured the scene below and relayed it back to CIA Headquarters in Langley. Using real-time high-resolution optics, the CIA operators were able to make out the Taliban bunker that had the American soldiers pinned down and to fire Hellfire missiles at it. When the bomb smoke cleared, a jubilant voice came from the trapped Americans on the ground: the enemy bunker had been destroyed.27
By now both the Pentagon and Langley had come to see the value of the Predator drone as both a battlefield weapon and a tool for targeted assassination. The combat career of the remote-controlled UAV had begun. But at roughly this time a CIA drone may have also made its first confirmed kill of an innocent victim, showing that the drones could be double-edged swords. Just prior to Operation Anaconda, a CIA drone had spotted three men walking in the hills of Zawhar Kili. Zawhar Kili, which is in the Afghan east, had been used in the 1980s as a base by the mujahideen, including bin Laden at one time. It had been heavily bombed by the United States during Operation Enduring Freedom.
In February the CIA drone operators noticed that the three men in the hills near Zawhar Kili appeared to be led by a tall man. The decision was made to fire a missile on the men gathered on the hill in the hopes that the tall man was bin Laden. The missiles were fired, and three men were killed instantaneously without ever knowing what happened to them. It was later announced that the CIA had fired on a figure suspected to be bin Laden himself. But when a Washington Post war correspondent rushed to the remote scene of the attack to investigate, he found that the man on the hill was not bin Laden at all. In fact he was a local villager named Mir Ahmad. He and his friends were scavenging for scrap metal from U.S. ordnance on the Afghan-Pakistani border when the drone found and killed them. The reporter described his findings as follows:
“I was going past there toward Khost, and I heard the sound of an explosion,” [a local villager] said. “The three were cut in half. They were just poor people trying to get money to feed their families.”
Khan said Ahmad had two wives and five children. The Pentagon has said that an unmanned Predator drone spotted a group of men at Zhawar, and that others seemed to be acting in a deferential manner toward one tall man. U.S. officials have said they received other, unspecified information that the men were al Qaeda leaders before giving approval to fire the missile.28
Another report from the area provides a heartbreaking account of how the local villagers dealt with the tragedy that had been inflicted on them by one CIA drone:
They were there making a living, Gir’s uncle said. His nephew “came down with a load of firewood from the mountains, and then said he was going out to collect some metal,” Janat Khan said. “He said he’d be back soon.”
Late that afternoon, they heard the news of the missile attack, Janat Khan said. The men of the village gathered coffins and went to retrieve the bodies.
“We were scared we would be bombed, but we had an obligation to bury them,” Qosmat Khan said. They had to collect the pieces of two of the men. Daraz’s body was intact, and he might have lived for a while, but he was dead when the village men arrived, said his brother.29
When subsequently asked about the unfortunate incident by a reporter who wondered if the errant strike presaged “some kind of public relations disaster,” a defensive Donald Rumsfeld said, “I’m always concerned when there is an allegation made that suggests that some innocent person was—that an attack was inappropriate or that some innocent person was killed or injured. Obviously, anyone would be concerned about that.”30 Clearly everyone involved, from the secretary of defense to the head of the CIA, understood from this incident that the drones, for all their advanced optics and loitering capacity, were only as good as their intelligence. In their eagerness to kill bin Laden, the CIA drone operators had just killed three civilians in precisely the sort of mistake CIA director George Tenet had fretted about.
Thus, at a relatively early stage of the game, the CIA came to see the drones as an advantage and a liability. They were an unprecedentedly accurate tool for killing the likes of al Qaeda number three Muhammad Atef “al Kumandan,” but they were still reliant on solid humint in order to be effective. The local Afghan governor at Zawhar Kili captured this dichotomy when he said, “We are happy that they [the Americans] came, and we are ready to help them. But the people are starting to get angry at them.”31