“A controlled delivery?”
“That’s it, a controlled delivery. They told me they’d let me drive the car away with the drugs still in it. I would deliver the drugs as if nothing had happened. They would follow me and when the moment was right they would arrest the people who were waiting for the consignment. They told me I would get a greatly reduced sentence, maybe as little as three years. I told them I had no idea where to take the drugs because they weren’t mine. So then they said they were arresting me and they were also arresting my wife because it was obvious we were in cahoots. I started to panic and I told them, yes, the drugs were mine, but she didn’t know anything. They phoned the prosecutor and he told them to take my statement and arrest me, but only me. So they took down my confession, arrested me and let my wife go.”
He was speaking calmly, but with an undercurrent of desperation.
He asked me for a cigarette and I told him I didn’t have any because I’d quit a couple of years ago. He hadn’t smoked for ten years either, he said. He’d started again the day after he went into prison.
Who had he appointed as his defence counsel when he was arrested? And why had he decided to change now? From the way he looked at me before replying, it was clear he’d been expecting the question.
“When they arrested me, they asked me who my lawyer was, so that they could inform him. I didn’t have a lawyer and I told them I didn’t know who to appoint. My wife was still there-a friend had come to collect our daughter – and I told her to get advice from someone about finding a good lawyer. The next day she appointed someone.”
“And who did she appoint?”
This was where the really strange part of the affair started, if Paolicelli was telling the truth.
“My wife was just leaving home when she was approached by a man who said he was acting on behalf of some friends who wanted to help us. He told her to appoint a lawyer from Rome named Corrado Macri, who would sort things out for me. He gave her a piece of paper with this lawyer’s name and a mobile number and told her to appoint him straight away, so that he could visit me in prison before I was interrogated by the examining magistrate.”
“And what did your wife do?”
Paolicelli’s wife, who was at her wits’ end and didn’t know any lawyers, appointed this Macri. A few hours later, he arrived from Rome, as if he’d been waiting to be appointed by her and didn’t have any other work at the moment. He visited Paolicelli in prison and told him not to worry, he’d sort it all out. When Paolicelli asked him who had engaged him and who the man was who had approached his wife, he again told him not to worry; as long as he heeded his, Macri’s, advice, everything would be fine. His first piece of advice was to exercise his right to remain silent at that first interview with the examining magistrate or he might make the situation worse.
I wondered by what stretch of the imagination the situation could have been made worse, but I didn’t say that to Paolicelli.
They appealed the arrest, but the custody order was confirmed.
I didn’t see how there could have been any other decision. But I didn’t say that either.
Macri then appealed against the decision on the grounds that there had been a procedural irregularity – he didn’t specify what it was – which gave him high hopes that he could have the proceedings declared invalid.
His high hopes turned out to be unfounded because the custody order was confirmed again. But that didn’t dent Macri’s optimism. He told Paolicelli and his wife not to worry, to be patient, and he would sort everything out. According to Paolicelli, he said this in a knowing tone, like someone who has the right cards up his sleeve and will play them when the time is right.
When they got to the preliminary hearing, Macri again advised Paolicelli not to say anything, and they opted for the fast-track procedure. The result of that, I already knew.
“And what did Macri say then?”
“Again he told me not to worry, he would sort everything out.”
“Was he joking?”
“No. He said he wasn’t surprised at the result – after weeks of telling me that at worst I’d only get four or five years – and that the appeal court would be sure to reduce the sentence. It was when I read the appeal he prepared-a one-page document with almost nothing written on it – that I blew my top.”
“What happened?”
“I told him he was gambling with my life. I told him I knew perfectly well who had sent him. And then I told him I was pissed off and that I’d call the examining magistrate and tell him everything.”
“What was it you were going to tell the magistrate?”
“There wasn’t anything specific. I only said it in the heat of anger, to shake him up a bit. The fact is, I have no idea who sent him. But he must have believed me, he must have thought I really did have something important to tell.”
“And what did he say?”
“He turned really nasty. He told me I should be very careful about what I did, and especially about what I said. He said accidents sometimes happen in prison to people who can’t keep their mouths shut.”
I noticed that he was panting a little. He had to take a breath before starting again.
“I didn’t have anything to tell the magistrate. Apart from the fact that the drugs weren’t mine. He wouldn’t have believed me. You haven’t.”
I was about to reply. Then I told myself that he was right. So I said nothing and let him continue.
“Anyway, he told me that if I didn’t trust him any more there was no reason for him to continue as my lawyer. He was dropping the case, but I should remember what he’d said. If I asked to speak to a magistrate, they would know immediately. Then he left.”
Now I was the one who needed a cigarette. It didn’t happen often – usually only when things were getting complicated. And if Paolicelli was telling the truth, this whole business was complicated, to say the least.
“Oh, I nearly forgot something.”
“What?”
“He didn’t ask me for money. Despite all the times he came to Bari, all the expenses he must have incurred, he didn’t want to be paid. I said I wanted to pay him something and he told me not to worry, that when we had sorted everything out – he always talked about sorting everything out – I could buy him a present. Then, when he got the prosecutor to lift the sequestration order on the car, which is in my wife’s name, he offered to collect it personally. I don’t think that’s normal conduct for a lawyer.”
No, it wasn’t normal conduct for a lawyer at all.
This whole business of the lawyer was strange. Too convoluted to have been made up. I didn’t know what I was dealing with. I was thinking hard, and he must have realized that, because he didn’t interrupt me. Was it possible that the drugs really weren’t his? Could someone really have thought up this method of transporting large quantities of cocaine? The more I thought about it, the more schizophrenic my reflections became. On the one hand, I told myself this was just meaningless speculation, things like that only happened in films or novels. On the other hand, the idea that Paolicelli could be telling the truth seemed both appalling and very plausible. The whole affair was like one of those magic cards I used to find in the packets of processed cheese when I was a child: depending on how you moved them the image changed, the figure moved, and other figures appeared. This case was like a magic card, with murky figures and a vague feeling of rottenness as soon as you go too close to it.
I told him this was enough for the moment. I had to look at the papers, to get a better idea of the case. He said his wife had a copy of the whole file and she would bring it to my office before the end of the week.
He asked me how much he should pay me as an advance and I replied that I had to look at the papers before I could agree to take on the case, especially as a colleague was involved. He nodded and didn’t ask me any more questions.