Выбрать главу

Turning to ownership shares, the comparability of country statistics is compromised in several ways. First, OECD countries did not routinely report data on the value of output or assets or the size of employment by public enterprises.[130] For the OECD countries shown in Table 2A.2,1 rely on the data for many OECD countries in the 1970s and 1980s, assembled by the economist Branko Milanovic, for output and employment shares of “state-owned enterprises in commercial activities.” In Milanovic’s data, “government services proper” are excluded; this refers to government services supplied free of charge, from defense and policing to health and education.

Second, for Comecon countries we have two sources on ownership shares. One is, again, Milanovic, as shown in the table. Alternatively, there is an official source, because such figures were also compiled and reported by Comecon statisticians, and they too are shown in the table. Their coverage table 2A.1. Measures of state capacity across countries: Fiscal ratios in 1980

(A) OECD countries, general government current receipts, percent of: GDP (B) Comecon countries, current government revenues, percent of: NMP GDP
United States 31.0 Czechoslovakia 63.5 46.6
Canada 36.7 East Germany 70.0 51.4
Iceland 37.2 Soviet Union 66.0 48.4
Denmark 48.0 Hungary 72.1 52.9
Norway 51.2 Bulgaria 64.9 47.6
Sweden 51.7 Poland 62.8 46.0
France 46.0      
Netherlands 49.0      
Belgium 46.1      
Austria 47.1      
Japan 27.7      
Italy 33.0      
Finland 43.6      
United Kingdom 37.0      
Spain 28.5      
Portugal 26.8      
Unweighted mean 40.6 Unweighted mean 66.6 48.8

Note. The countries shown in the table are ranked in declining order of their real GDP per head (in dollars and international prices of 1990) according to the Total Economy Database (January 2014) of the Conference Board at http://www.con ference-board.org/data/economydatabase/. For 1980, the unweighted mean for the OECD countries shown was $13,929, and for Comecon countries it was $6,603. The real GDP per head of the poorest OECD country, Portugal, was $8,044; that of the richest Comecon country, Czechoslovakia, was $7,982. Thus, the two groups of countries do not overlap.

Sources: (A) OECD countries: Economic Outlook, no. 108 (December 2020), https:// www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/data/oecd-economic-outlook-statistics-and-pro-jections_eo-data-en, gives general government current receipts as a percentage of GDP (the sum of final goods and services at market prices) (series YRGQ). (B) Comecon countries: current government revenues (taxes, levies, fees, fines, and enterprise incomes) are calculated in percent of NMP (net material product, the sum of final goods and intermediate services at prevailing prices) from United Nations, Statistical Yearbook 1981, Tables 26 and 46. Shares of net material product are then recalculated as shares of GDP, based on the observation that the Soviet GDP for 1980 reported by the government statistical agency was 36 percent greater than NMP utilized (Goskomstat, Narodnoe khoziaistvo SSSR v 1990g., 5). The same conversion factor is applied to all the Comecon countries. Unweighted averages are then calculated for this table from the figures shown.

TABLE 2A.2. Measures of state capacity across countries^ Productive or com^ mercial activity under state ownership around ^^^^
^A^ OECD countries
  Output of public corporations^ percent of GDP Year
United States   1.3 (1983)
West Germany   10.7 (1982)
Denmark   6.3 (1974)
France   16.5 (1982)
Netherlands   3.6 (1971-1973)
Australia   9.4 (1978/79)
Austria   14.5 (1978/79)
Italy   14.0 (1982)
United Kingdom   10.7 (1983)
New Zealand   12.0 (1987)
Spain   4.1 (1979)
Greece   6.1 (1979)
Portugal   9.7 (1976)
Unweighted mean   9.1 . . .
(B) Comecon countries and China
  Socialist sector, percent of net material product State-owned enterprises, percent of net material product (various yearsЪ  
  (1980) (col. 1) (col. 2) Year (col.3)
Czechoslovakia 99.4 99.7 (1986)
East Germany 99.5 96.5 (1982)
Soviet Union 100 96.0 (1985)
Hungary 96.5 69.8 (1980)
Bulgaria 99.96 . . . . . .
Poland 84.3 83.4 (1980)
вернуться

130

The problem of comparing “the size of the public sector” across the OECD is further discussed by Lanfranchi and Perrin, Measuring Public Employment in OECD Countries.