My double looked up and there was anxiety and tension in his eyes.
“Listen, but why is that terrible? Okay, we worked — rather, you worked. So you made an experimental determination and on its basis a discovery. A method of synthesizing information into a person. The ancient dream of the alchemist…. That's very nice! Once upon a time kings financed ventures like that very generously. Of course, they chopped off the heads of researchers who had failed, but if you think about it, they were right. If you can't do it, don't take it on. But nothing will happen to us. Just the reverse. Why is it so terrible?”
“Because this isn't the Middle Ages,” I thought to myself. And not the last century. And not even the beginning of the twentieth century, when everything was still ahead of us. In those days, discoverers had the moral right to spread their arms and say: well, we had no idea things would turn out badly…. We, their lucky descendants, don't have that right. Because we know. Because it's all happened before. It had all happened before: gas attacks, according to science; Maidanek and Auschwitz, according to science; Hiroshima and Nagasaki, according to science. Plans for global warfare — science with the use of mathematics. Limiting warfare — also science…. Decades had passed since the last world war. The ruins had been rebuilt. Fifty million corpses had rotted and enriched the earch. Hundreds of millions of people had been born and grown up — and the memory had not faded. It was horrible to remember and more horrible to forget. Because it had not become part of the past. The knowledge remained: people can do that.
The inventors and researchers are merely specialists in their field. To obtain new information from nature they have to expend so much energy and inventiveness that they have neither strength nor ideas left for thinking outside their fields — what will this do in real life? These people and their chosen fields — people for whom any change or discovery is just another means of achieving old aims: power, wealth, influence, and buyable pleasures. If we gave them our process, they would see only one new thing in it: it's profitable! Should they make doubles of famous singers, actors, and musicians? No, that isn't profitable. It's better to produce records and posters. But it would be profitable to mass — produce people for a special goaclass="underline" voters to beat a political opponent (much easier than spending hundreds of millions on the usual election campaign), women for brothels, workers in rare fields, cannon — fodder soldiers… and even specialists with narrow vision and tame temperament who would continue inventing without getting involved in things that were none of their business. A man with a specific function — a man — thing. What could be worse? How do we deal with things and machines that have outlived their usefulness and have fulfilled their function? They're recycled, burned, compressed, discarded. And you can treat men, things, the same way.
“But that's the way it is over there….” My double waved in a vague direction. “Our society wouldn't permit it.”
“And we don't have people who are ready to use everything from the ideas of communism to false radio reports, from their work situation to quotes from the classics in order to become wealthy, and have a good position, and then to get more and more for themselves, at no matter what cost? People who see the least attempt to reduce their privileges as a phenomenal catastrophe?”
“We do,” my double agreed. “But people basically are good or else the world would have turned into a mass of bums attacking each other a long time ago, and died without thermonuclear war. But… if you don't count the minor natural disasters — floods, earthquakes, epidemics — people are at fault in all their problems, including the most horrible ones. It's their fault that they submitted to what they shouldn't have submitted to, agreed to what they should have fought, and thought that they weren't involved. At fault that they did work that paid better instead of work that was needed by everyone and themselves. If more people on earth coordinated their work and business with the interests of mankind, we would have nothing to worry about with our discovery. But that's not the way it is. And that's why, if there is at least one influential and active bastard in dangerous proximity, our discovery will turn into a hideous monstrosity.”
“Because the application of scientific discoveries is mere technology. Once upon a time, technology was invented to help man in his battle between man and man. And in that use technology didn't solve any problems; it only increased them. Think how many scientific, technological and sociological problems there are now instead of the one that was solved twenty years ago: how can you synthesize helium from hydrogen?
“If we announce our discovery, life will become even scarier. And we will have fame. Every man, woman, and child will know exactly whom to curse and why.”
“Listen, maybe you're right.?” my double asked. “We saw nothing, know nothing. People have enough terrible discoveries to deal with as it is. Let's cut off the juice and turn off the faucets. How about it?”
“And right away, the problem no longer exists. I'll write off the reagents I used up and make up some excuse about the work. And I'll start work on something simpler and more innocent….” “I'll go to Vladivostok to be a fitter in the ports.” We stopped talking. Venus blazed over the black trees outside the window. A cat cried with a child's voice. A howling note pierced the grounds' silence — they were running tests on a new jet engine in Lena's construction bureau. “Work goes on. It's right; 1941 cannot be repeated.” I was thinking about it so that I could put off my decision a little longer. “Deep underground, plutonium and hydrogen bombs are going off. Highly paid scientists and engineers are determined to master nuclear arms. And pointy — nosed rockets peer into space from their concrete silos all over the world. Each is pointed at its objective; they're wired up. Computers are constantly testing them: any problems? As soon as the predetermined time of reliability runs out on an electronic unit, technicians in uniform unplug it and quickly, quickly, replace it with another unit, as though the war they absolutely had to win was about to start any second. Work goes on.”
“Nonsense!” I said. “Humanity isn't mature enough for many things — nuclear energy and space flight — so what? The discovery is objective reality; you can't cover it up. If not us, someone else will come upon it. The basic idea of the experiment is simple enough. Are you sure that they will deal with the discovery better than we? I'm not. That's why we must think what to do to keep this discovery from becoming a threat to mankind.”
“It's complicated,” my double sighed and stood up. “I'll take a look at what's happening in the tank.” He was back in a flash. Stunned. “Val, there's… father's in there!”
Radio operators have a sure sign to go by: if a complex electronic circuit works the first time after it's put together, expect trouble. If it doesn't foul up in the trials, then it will embarrass the workers when the inspection commission is there; if it manages to pass the commission, then it will exhibit one flaw after another in mass production. The weak points always show up.
The computer was trying to achieve informational equilibrium not with me, the direct source of information, but with the entire information environment that it found out about from me, with the entire world. That's why Lena appeared and that's why my father appeared.
And that's why all the rest happened. That's why my double and I worked nonstop for a whole week. This activity of the computer's was a logical extension of its development; but from a technical point of view it was an attempt with lousy equipment. Instead of a “model of the world” the tank contained a nightmare.