I ate while half watching the local news. A perfectly coiffed anchor reported, with appropriate solemnity, the discovery of three bodies in a home in Shelby. Went sunny while announcing the approval of Presbyterian hospital as a Level II trauma center. Darkened again as she described the previous day’s fatality at Wilson Air.
The screen cut to footage of the private terminal, undoubtedly shot from the far side of yellow police tape. I recognized Larabee and one of the MCME death investigators. The morgue van. The segment finished with the usual line about nondisclosure of the decedent’s name pending notification of his family.
After clearing the dishes, I considered, for a heartbeat, returning to the mounds of paper spread across the dining room table. Decided instead to look more thoroughly into websleuthing. Strike’s surliness on the mountain both annoyed and confused me. Wasn’t the goal to clear unsolved cases?
First, I visited sites that explained websleuthing. I learned that, in one way, the pursuit is like geocaching. Participants are everywhere. The guy who fixes your muffler. The kid who bags your groceries. The old woman who sold you a latte in Rome. Or Riga. Or Rio. Anyone with a computer and curiosity can jump right in.
Then I went to the actual sites. Checked out blogs, newsgroup posts, chat room threads. The more I looped and read, the more uneasy I grew.
Many websleuths seemed straightforward, eager in their desire to bring long-ago killers to justice, to match nameless remains with missing persons. Some were intelligent, their posts objective and on point. Wind. Vegasmom. Befound. Others, though equally earnest, were less cogent in their thinking. Or their prose. Crispie. Answerman. Despite the brainpower, or lack thereof, the majority came across as honest and resolute, committed to the free exchange of information.
I’m not a psychologist, but I also sensed a very different type of player. A type lugging a whole lot of baggage. A type bringing a mindset born of personal history, personal kinks.
Among this second group, some seemed bent on igniting discord while watching from the safety of online anonymity. Their comments and responses, often vicious, hinted at megalomania. At paranoia.
I understand the nature of Internet dialogue. There’s no nuance, no tone. Just words on a screen. As with texting, messages can often be misinterpreted, leading to confusion, sometimes hurt. A portion of the heat in some debates, which was substantial, could be attributed to lack of clarity. But not all. Many posts seemed meant to goad, to incite acrimony.
It was also obvious that some were in the game not for justice but for glory. These players were cagey and guarded. Having accumulated vast files, they were loath to share their hard-won information, particularly with legitimate sites such as NamUs or the Doe Network. A few exhibited a level of territoriality that was silverback in its ferocity.
And there was one element of the subculture that I found particularly disturbing. Websleuths could turn on each other like wolves at a carcass. Case in point: Todd Matthews.
Matthews was a veteran cybersleuth and a supporter of the Doe Network from its inception. When NamUs was born and Matthews hired on as its administrator, a cadre of former supporters viewed him as a defector and a sellout. The point is justice, they said, not a steady income.
After much mudslinging in both directions, the Doe Network accused Matthews of breach of confidentiality and failure to uphold administrative standards. In April 2011, the board voted to kick him out. He went, but not with a smile on his face.
The Doe Network wasn’t alone in bickering over power and control. Cold Case Investigations, Porchlight International, CLUES—many sites had experienced their own melodramas. All the squabbling and name-calling left me feeling like I’d snooped into the texts of a gaggle of junior high divas.
At nine-thirty, I took a break. Waiting for the kettle to boil, I decided to change tack. During my earlier visit to CLUES to learn about Cora Teague, I’d discovered that Hazel Strike used the ID luckyloo. I decided to follow threads in which luckyloo had engaged.
And found a feud that made all others pale in comparison. The barbs and accusations flying between luckyloo and someone posting as WendellC, though far from poetic, were clear in their meaning. The two couldn’t stand each other.
Without knowing his actual name, I learned that WendellC was a legend among websleuthers. He’d scored many solves, but one in particular had boosted his status to superstar. I followed a link to a story chronicling the case.
In 1984, the partial skeleton of a teenage girl was found wrapped in a quilt in a farm field in Cuyahoga County, outside Cleveland, Ohio. A complete skull was recovered, allowing a facial reconstruction. In time the image, barely more than a sketch, appeared on websites across the cyberuniverse.
Over the decades, scores poked and prodded and dug, but no match to a missing person was ever found. The victim came to be known as Quilt Girl.
Now and then stories ran in the local Ohio papers. In 2004, on the twentieth anniversary of the skeleton’s discovery, the case was featured on America’s Most Wanted, along with the original facial reconstruction. Tips flooded in. None panned out.
In 2007, more than two decades after Quilt Girl turned up among the soybeans, WendellC read an article in True Sleuth magazine. The piece revisited the case of Annette Wyant, an eighteen-year-old freshman who’d disappeared from Oberlin College in 1979. A photo accompanied the story, along with an age-progressed image suggesting Wyant’s appearance at age forty-eight.
WendellC was familiar with the facial reconstruction done on Quilt Girl. Annette Wyant’s picture looked nothing like it, thus the reason no link had ever been suggested. But WendellC noted one striking fact. Oberlin College was less than forty miles from the farm where Quilt Girl had been found. He phoned the Cuyahoga County medical examiner and requested an autopsy photo showing close-ups of the skull. Reluctantly, the current ME complied.
Upon viewing the image, WendellC noted another striking fact. Annette Wyant and Quilt Girl both had a marked overbite, a feature not reflected in the facial reconstruction. He again phoned the ME, stating his belief that the skeleton was that of the missing student.
Dental records were dug from a file archived by long-departed personnel. Twenty-three years after her discovery, Quilt Girl went home to her family.
I googled, found articles on the disappearance, more recent ones on the identification. Annette Wyant was buried with little fanfare in her hometown of Plainfield, Illinois. The Chicago Tribune ran a small story. The Cleveland Plain Dealer. In both, a middle-aged woman was pictured standing graveside. Beside her was a tall, craggy man in an ill-fitting suit. A caption identified the woman as Wyant’s sister, the man as Wendell Clyde of Huntersville, North Carolina.
No arrest was ever made. From experience, I guessed Wyant’s cause of death remained “undetermined.”
Intrigued, I returned to the websleuthing sites.
In discussion after discussion, fellow amateurs praised WendellC’s brilliance and perseverance. Congratulations poured in from around the globe.
Hazel Strike was furious and did not mince words. In post after post, luckyloo called WendellC a backstabbing snake. A pissant charlatan. A scumbucket fraud. Strike claimed she and Clyde had worked as a team. Accused him of taking credit for joint discoveries. WendellC was equally vitriolic in his responses.
I’d have found the dispute amusing were it not for the virulent tone. I lasted another half hour. Then, repulsed by the juvenile nature of the spat, I went to bed.
—
I spent Friday up to my elbows in brain tissue and bloody bone fragments.