Выбрать главу

26. Rosaleen A. McCarthy and Elizabeth K. Warrington, “Visual Associative Agnosia: A Clinico-Anatomical Study of a Single Case,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 49 (1986): 1233–40.

8. IN-GROUPS AND OUT-GROUPS

1. Muzafer Sherif et al., Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1961).

2. L. Keeley, War Before Civilization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).

3. N. Chagnon, Yanomamo (Fort Worth: Harcourt, 1992).

4. Blake E. Ashforth and Fred Mael, “Social Identity Theory and the Organization,” Academy of Management Review 14, no. 1 (1989): 20–39.

5. Markus Brauer, “Intergroup Perception in the Social Context: The Effects of Social Status and Group Membership on Perceived Out-Group Homogeneity,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37 (2001): 15–31.

6. K. L. Dion, “Cohesiveness as a Determinant of Ingroup-Outgroup Bias,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28 (1973): 163–71, and Ashforth and Mael, “Social Identity Theory.”

7. Charles K. Ferguson and Harold H. Kelley, “Significant Factors in Overevaluation of Own-Group’s Product,” Journal of Personaliity and Social Psychology 69, no. 2 (1064): 223–28.

8. Patricia Linville et al., “Perceived Distributions of the Characteristics of In-Group and Out-Group Members: Empirical Evidence and a Computer Simulation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, no. 2 (1989): 165–88, and Bernadette Park and Myron Rothbart, “Perception of Out-Group Homogeneity and Levels of Social Categorization: Memory for the Subordinate Attributes of In-Group and Out-Group Members,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42, no. 6 (1982): 1051–68.

9. Park and Rothbart, “Perception of Out-Group Homogeneity.”

10. Margaret Shih et al., “Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance,” Psychological Science 10, no. 1 (January 1999): 80–83.

11. Noah J. Goldstein and Robert B. Cialdini, “Normative Influences on Consumption and Conservation Behaviors,” in Social Psychology and Consumer Behavior, ed. Michaela Wänke (New York: Psychology Press, 2009), 273–96.

12. Robert B. Cialdini et al., “Managing Social Norms for Persuasive Impact,” Social Influence 1, no. 1 (2006): 3–15.

13. Marilyn B. Brewer and Madelyn Silver, “Ingroup Bias as a Function of Task Characteristics,” European Journal of Social Psychology 8 (1978): 393–400.

14. Ashforth and Mael, “Social Identity Theory.”

15. Henri Tajfel, “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination,” Scientific American 223 (November 1970): 96–102, and H. Tajfel et al., “Social Categorization and Intergroup Behavior,” European Journal of Social Psychology 1, no. 2 (1971): 149–78.

16. Sherif et al., Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation, 209.

17. Robert Kurzban et al., “Can Race be Erased? Coalitional Computation and Social Categorization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98, no. 26 (December 18, 2001): 15387–92.

9. FEELINGS

1. Corbett H. Thigpen and Hervey Cleckley, “A Case of Multiple Personalities,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 49, no. 1 (1954): 135–51.

2. Charles E. Osgood and Zella Luria, “A Blind Analysis of a Case of Multiple Personality Using the Semantic Differential,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 49, no. 1 (1954): 579–91.

3. Nadine Brozan, “The Real Eve Sues to Film the Rest of Her Story,” New York Times, February 7, 1989.

4. Piercarlo Valdesolo and David DeSteno, “Manipulations of Emotional Context Shape Moral Judgment,” Psychological Science 17, no. 6 (2006): 476–77.

5. Steven W. Gangestad et al., “Women’s Preferences for Male Behavioral Displays Change Across the Menstrual Cycle,” Psychological Science 15, no. 3 (2004): 203–7, and Kristina M. Durante et al., “Changes in Women’s Choice of Dress Across the Ovulatory Cycle: Naturalistic and Laboratory Task-Based Evidence,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34 (2008): 1451–60.

6. John F. Kihlstrom and Stanley B. Klein, “Self-Knowledge and Self-Awareness,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 818 (December 17, 2006): 5–17, and Shelley E. Taylor and Jonathan D. Brown, “Illusion and Well-Being: A Social Psychological Perspective on Mental Health,” Psychological Bulletin 103, no. 2 (1988): 193–210.

7. H. C. Kelman, “Deception in Social Research,” Transaction 3 (1966): 20–24; see also Steven J. Sherman, “On the Self-Erasing Nature of Errors of Prediction,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, no. 2 (1980): 211–21.

8. E. Grey Dimond et al., “Comparison of Internal Mammary Artery Ligation and Sham Operation for Angina Pectoris,” American Journal of Cardiology 5, no. 4 (April 1960): 483–86; see also Walter A. Brown, “The Placebo Effect,” Scientific American (January 1998): 90–95.

9. William James, “What Is an Emotion?” Mind 9, no. 34 (April 1884): 188–205.

10. Tor D. Wager, “The Neural Bases of Placebo Effects in Pain,” Current Directions in Psychological Science 14, no. 4 (2005): 175–79, and Tor D. Wager et al., “Placebo-Induced Changes in fMRI in the Anticipation and Experience of Pain,” Science 303 (February 2004): 1162–67.

11. James H. Korn, “Historians’ and Chairpersons’ Judgments of Eminence Among Psychologists,” American Psychologist 46, no. 7 (July 1991): 789–92.

12. William James to Carl Strumpf, February 6, 1887, in The Correspondence of William James, vol. 6, ed. Ignas K. Skrupskelis and Elizabeth M. Berkeley (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1992), 202.

13. D. W. Bjork, The Compromised Scientist: William James in the Development of American Psychology (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983), 12.

14. Henry James, ed., The Letters of William James (Boston: Little, Brown, 1926), 393–94.

15. Stanley Schachter and Jerome E. Singer, “Cognitive, Social, and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State,” Psychological Review 69, no. 5 (September 1962): 379–99.

16. Joanne R. Cantor et al., “Enhancement of Experienced Sexual Arousal in Response to Erotic Stimuli Through Misattribution of Unrelated Residual Excitation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32, no. 1 (1975): 69–75.

17. See http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0063013/.