Could you stab a copy of a photograph of a loved one through the eyes?
Now consider all three. What order would you rank them in from the least to the worst act? Try this list out with others (maybe as an after-dinner conversation) and see if you all agree. I bet you will not.
IS YOUR SUPERSENSE STRONG?
The ‘magical ideation’ scale that I talked about in chapter 9 is a measure of one’s tendency to the supersense. It was devised by Mark Eckblad and Loren Chapman from the University of Wisonsin-Madison in 1983 and has been used to look at magical (supernatural) thinking in the general public. How do you score on this? Read each item and tick the true or false box.
1
Some people can make me aware of them just by thinking about me.
False
True
2
I have had the momentary feeling that I might not be human.
False
True
3
I have sometimes been fearful of stepping on pavement cracks.
False
True
4
I think I could learn to read other peoples’ minds if I wanted to.
False
True
5
Horoscopes are right too often for it to be a coincidence.
False
True
6
Things sometimes seem to be in different places when I get home, even though no one has been there.
False
True
7
Numbers like 13 and 7 have no special power.
True
False
8
I have occasionally had the silly feeling that a TV or radio broadcaster knew I was listening to them.
False
True
9
I have worried that other people on other planets may be influencing what is happening on earth
False
True
10
The government refuses to tell the truth about flying saucers.
False
True
11
I have felt that there were messages for me in the way things are arranged, like in a store window.
False
True
12
I have never doubted that my dreams are the products of my own mind.
True
False
13
Good luck charms don’t work.
True
False
14
I have noticed sounds on my records that are not there at other times.
False
True
15
The hand motions that strangers make seem to influence me at times.
False
True
16
I almost never dream about things before they happen.
True
False
17
I have had the momentary feeling that someone’s place has been taken by a look-alike.
False
True
18
It is not possible to harm others merely by thinking bad thoughts about them.
True
False
19
I have sometimes sensed an evil presence around me, although I could not see it.
False
True
20
I sometimes have a feeling of gaining or losing energy when certain people look at me or touch me.
False
True
21
I have sometimes had the passing thought that strangers are in love with me.
False
True
22
I have never had the feeling that certain thoughts of mine really belonged to someone else.
True
False
23
When introduced to strangers, I rarely wonder whether I have known them before.
True
False
24
If reincarnation were true, it would explain some unusual experiences I have had.
False
True
25
People often behave so strangely that one wonders if they are part of an experiment.
False
True
26
At times I perform certain little rituals to ward off negative influences.
False
True
27
I have felt that I might cause something to happen just by thinking about it.
False
True
28
I have wondered whether the spirits of the dead can influence the living.
False
True
29
At times I have felt that a professor’s lecture was meant especially for me.
False
True
30
I have sometimes felt that strangers were reading my mind.
False
True
Now add up all the boxes in the right-hand column that you ticked. The average score (based on 1,500 US students) was 9 for males and 10 for females. How did you score? Do you think the questions measure supernatural thinking?
WHAT PATTERNS DO YOU SEE?
In the book, I talk about how some of us with a strong supersense are more inclined towards seeing structure and patterns in the world. Test your self with the following set of images taken from the ‘Snowy Pictures task’ (© ETS) used to assess this capacity. Can you see any hidden patterns? Answers are at the bottom.
There are hidden patterns in images, 17, 19, 21, 22 & 24.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Many of the ideas I am presenting are based on academic research but they have been road-tested in public lectures and informal gatherings throughout the UK. When you need to talk in a way that most people can understand, it forces you to cut to the chase: to stop waffling and get to the heart of the matter. Academics are trained to recognize weaknesses, but in doing so we can become preoccupied with hedging our bets, qualifying our assertions and being over-cautious in our interpretations, so that we often seem to be sitting on a fence of indecision. That’s why writing a book such as this one might make an academic nervous.
Thankfully, I have been helped along the way. I am indebted to colleagues, students, friends, and family who have read different versions, made suggestions and generally encouraged me to be less nervous about the book. In alphabetical order I would like to thank Sara Baker, Horace Barlow, Susan Blackmore, Paul Bloom, Peter Brugger, Zoltan Dienes, Katy Donnelly, Shiri Einav, Norman Freeman, Susan Gelman, Iain Gilchrist, Thalia Gjersoe, Richard Gregory, Charlotte Hardie, Hilary and Peter Hodgson, Loyale Hood, Alison and Ross Hood, Marjaana Lindeman, Neil Macrae, Peter Millican, Steven Pinker, Paul Rozin, Reba Rosenberg, Ali Smith, Elaine Snell, Andrew Stuart, Arno van Voorst, Alice Wilson and Stephen Woolley. I also want to thank all those working in the Bristol Cognitive Development Centre who have supported me in this project.