The psychology of crime has become the dominant form of mystery fiction in recent years, while the classic tale of observation and deduction has faded further into the background. Those tales of pure detection may be the most difficult mystery stories to write, as it has become increasingly difficult to find original motivations for murder, or a new murder method, or an original way to hide a vital clue until the detective unearths it. The working definition of a mystery story for this series is any work of fiction in which a crime, or the threat of a crime, is central to the theme or the plot. The detective story is merely one subgenre in the literary form known as the mystery, just as are romantic suspense, espionage, legal legerdemain, medical thriller, political duplicity, and stories told from the point of view of the villain.
As Michele reads the enormous number of submissions, she passes along those worthy of consideration, after which I select the fifty best (or at least those I liked best) to send to the guest editor, who selects the twenty that are then collected and reprinted, the other thirty being listed in an honor roll as “Other Distinguished Mystery Stories.”
The guest editor this year is Jonathan Lethem, the outstanding author of The Feral Detective. His first novel, Gun, with Occasional Music, published twenty-five years ago, successfully combined elements of science fiction and detective fiction. After publishing three more science fiction novels, he published Motherless Brooklyn, a successful National Book Critics Circle Award winner. His next book, The Fortress of Solitude, became a New York Times bestseller. In 2005 he received a MacArthur Fellowship.
This is an appropriate time (it’s always an appropriate time) to thank the previous guest editors, who have done so much to make this prestigious series such a resounding success: Robert B. Parker, Sue Grafton, Ed McBain, Donald E. Westlake, Lawrence Block, James Ellroy, Michael Connelly, Nelson DeMille, Joyce Carol Oates, Scott Turow, Carl Hiaasen, George Pelecanos, Jeffery Deaver, Lee Child, Harlan Coben, Robert Crais, Lisa Scottoline, Laura Lipp-man, James Patterson, Elizabeth George, John Sandford, and Louise Penny.
While I engage in a relentless quest to locate and read every mystery/crime/suspense story published, I live in terror that I will miss a worthy story, so if you are an author, editor, or publisher, or care about one, please feel free to send a book, magazine, or tearsheet to me c/o The Mysterious Bookshop, 58 Warren Street, New York, NY 10007. If the story first appeared electronically, you must submit a hard copy. It is vital to include the author’s contact information. No unpublished material will be considered for what should be obvious reasons. No material will be returned. If you distrust the postal service, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard.
To be eligible, a story must have been written by an American or Canadian and first published in an American or Canadian publication in the calendar year 2019. The earlier in the year I receive the story, the more fondly I regard it. For reasons known only to the dunderheads who wait until Christmas week to submit a story published the previous spring, holding eligible stories for months before submitting them occurs every year, causing seething anger while I read a stack of stories while my friends are trimming the Christmas tree or otherwise celebrating the holiday season. It had better be a damned good story if you do this.
Because of the very tight production schedule for this book, the absolute firm deadline is December 31. If the story arrives one day later, it will not be read. This is neither an arrogant nor a whimsical deadline. The tight schedule was established twenty-three years ago and it’s the only way to get the book published on time. I’m certain you understand.
o. p.
Introduction
As a kid, one who’d begun to want to write fiction by the time I was eleven or twelve, the first professional author I knew personally was Stanley Ellin, a master of the American crime short story. This was dumb luck for me — happenstance. Stan Ellin was one of the elders of the Brooklyn Friends Meeting — Quakers, as they’re colloquially called — a religious institution to which my father began taking me for Sunday school around that time.
Stan was a native of Brooklyn, a former steelworker and shipyard worker and army veteran who’d self-educated as a writer by immersing himself in the storytelling classics like Robert Louis Stevenson, Guy de Maupassant, and Edgar Allan Poe. Among fellow writers he was celebrated for his subtlety and perfectionism, his measured craft. Never particularly famous in the wider culture, Stan was treasured in the field. He collected a few Edgars, was the president of the Mystery Writers of America, saw his works filmed a few times, and galvanized everyone who knew him personally with his integrity, fierce attentiveness, and droll charisma. When at some point in my teenage years I declared to Stan my intention to become a published writer, he encouraged me — barely. “Keep writing,” he told me. Simple words.
Though he wrote remarkable and beguiling novels in a number of different modes — detective novels, urban noirs, Hitchcockian wide-screen chase thrillers — Stan’s greatest accomplishment was in the art of the short story, and the yearly appearance of a new Ellin story in Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine (he rarely managed more than one a year) was considered an event in the field. It took me a long time to realize how lucky I was to read Stan’s stories so early on, since he was the writer in plain sight for me, my parents’ friend and a local fixture, the fellow who somewhat scandalized his fellow Quakers with the darkness and sexuality in his late novels, particularly Mirror, Mirror on the Wall and Stronghold.
Yet he was also, truly, a marvel. A wizard. Stan’s story “The Question” remains one of the most acute and terrifying short stories I know, a study in complicity and implication that permanently illuminated my sense not only of what fiction can do but of what wallows in the recesses of the human psyche. “The Question” features an unrepeatable twist, but that was Stan’s signature: no two of his stories make the same moves. Like those of his models, Stevenson and Poe (and in some ways similar to those of international masters like Julio Cortázar and Jorge Luis Borges), each of Stan Ellin’s tales is singular, a tour de force.
I realize I’m describing stories that don’t appear in the anthology in your hands. You can seek out Stanley Ellin’s fiction now, or not. You can also skip this introduction, since that’s one of the main things introductions are for. I’ll at least explain: when Otto Penzler, who was Stan’s great friend and supporter as well as editor and publisher, asked me to consider selecting the stories for this year’s collection, the first thing I warned him of was that I’d want to make the introduction a tribute to Stanley Ellin. Thankfully, Otto didn’t blink.
Stan helped make me the person who’d be invited into this remarkable situation — not only a lifetime of reading and writing stories, of understanding how fiction can sustain a life and world-view, but of being invited by Otto to delve into the riches of the present version of the crime and mystery field and work with him on putting together this roster of remarkable stories. I’m not exclusively a crime writer (let alone a “mystery” writer, since I always forget to put in clues), and some people might say that my sporadic visitations to the role — three novels featuring detectives, in three different decades — makes me a wonky choice for presiding over this book.
I’m glad Otto didn’t think so. One of the things I love most about the present state of the crime field — or genre, that slippery word — is how much its boundaries have expanded and shifted, so that it has in certain ways engulfed and been engulfed by our larger understanding of what stories and novels are and what they can and should do. And yet (here’s the paradoxical part), much like the cousin fields of SF and fantasy and romance, the crime and mystery field remains a splendid affiliation, a community of obsession — perhaps an example of what Kurt Vonnegut called a “karass.” A family created by devotion.