"He had to wait years for authorization to construct the collegiate church and never lived to see the shroud displayed, since he died in Poitiers saving the life of the French king, whom he shielded with his own body during a battle. His widow donated the shroud to the church in Lirey, which contributed to the wealth of the city's clergy while at the same time inspiring the envy of the prelates of other towns and cities-and that, of course, created tremendous conflict throughout France.
"The bishop of Troyes ordered an exhaustive investigation into the Lirey shroud. An important witness was even brought forward to discredit its authenticity-a painter swore that he had been commissioned by the seigneur of Lirey to paint the image, and with that, the bishop prohibited its further display.
"It was to be another Geoffroy, Geoffroy de Charny the Second, who years later-in 1389, to be exact-persuaded Pope Clement the Seventh to authorize him once again to display the shroud. And once again, the bishop of Troyes intervened, alarmed by the influx of pilgrims to worship the relic. For a few months he managed to force de Charny to keep the shroud in its coffer and not actually display it, but meanwhile, de Charny reached a further agreement with the pope: He would be allowed to display the shroud on the condition that the clergy in Lirey be required to explain to the faithful that it was a painting done to represent the grave cloth of Christ."
In the same monotonous tone, Professor Marchais went on down through history, explaining that the daughter of Geoffroy II, Marguerite de Charny, decided to keep the shroud in the castle belonging to her second husband, the Comte de la Roche.
"Why?" asked Ana.
"Because in 1415, during the Hundred Years War, pillaging was rampant. So she thought the relic would be safer in her husband's castle, in Saint-Hippolyte sur le Doubs. She was an inventive woman, and when her second husband died, she added to the small income he had left her by charging a fee of a few pennies to anyone who wanted to see the shroud up close or pray before it. And it was her financial straits that led her several decades later to sell the relic to the House of Savoy, on March twenty-second, 1453, to be precise. The Lirey clergy protested, of course; they considered themselves the owners of the shroud, since the widow of that first Geoffroy de Charny had ceded it to them. But Marguerite ignored that. She lived in Varambom Castle and enjoyed the rents from the seigneury of Miribel, which were granted her by the House of Savoy. There is a contract to that effect, by the way, signed by the duke of Savoy, Louis the First. Since then, the shroud's history is transparent."
"1 wanted to ask you whether it's possible that the shroud came to Prance through the Templars."
"Ah! The Templars! So many legends, so unfairly they were treated, and all out of ignorance! It is rubbish, pure rubbish, that pseudoliterature on the Templars. Many organizations-some Masons, for instance-claim to be the heirs of the Temple. Some of them were, to put it in the popular parlance, 'on the good side,' during the French Revolution, for example, but others…"
"So the Temple has survived?"
"Well, of course there are organizations that, as I say, claim to be its heirs. Remember that in Scotland, the Temple was never dissolved. But in my opinion, the Temple died on March nineteenth, 1314, on the bonfire on which Philippe le Beau ordered the Grand Master Jacques de Molay immolated, along with the other knights who were with him."
"I've been in London. I found a center for Templar studies."
"I told you there are lodges and organizations that claim to be heirs of the Temple. I have no interest in them."
"Why is that?"
"Mademoiselle Jimenez, please. I am a historian."
"Yes, I know, but-"
"There are no buts. Anything else?"
"Yes, I'd like to know whether the de Charny family has come down to our own day, whether there are any descendants."
"The grand families intermarry. You should consult an expert in genealogy."
"Forgive me for pressing, professor, but where do you think this Geofrroy de Charny got the shroud?"
"I do not know. I've explained to you that he never said. Nor did his widow or the descendants who were its possessors until it passed into the hands of the House of Savoy. It could have been bought or received as a gift. Who knows? During those centuries, Europe was full of relics that had been brought back from the Crusades. Most of them were false, of course, which is why there are so many 'holy grails,' shrouds, saints' bones, pieces of the True Cross……"
"Is there any way to know whether the family of Geofrroy de Charny had any relationship to the Crusades?"
'As I said, you'll have to see a genealogist for that. Of course…"
Professor Marchais became more pensive, tapping the end of her pen on her desk. Ana sat silently, expectantly.
"It is possible, of course, that Geoffrey de Charny, whose name was spelled without the final e, may have had something to do with Geoffroy de Charney, with an e, the precept of the Temple in Normandy who died at the stake alongside Jacques de Molay and who also fought in the Holy Land. It's a question of the spelling of the name, and-"
"Yes, yes, that's it! They're from the same family!"
"Mademoiselle Jimenez, don't let yourself be led astray by what you wish the facts were. I said only that the two names might come from the same line, so that the Geoffroy de Charny who possessed the shroud-"
"-had it because years earlier the other Geoffroy brought it back from the Holy Land and kept it in the family home. That's well within the realm of possibility."
'Actually, it isn't. The precept of Normandy was a Templar. If he had possessed the relic, it would have belonged to the Temple, not to him or his family. We have a great deal of documentation on that Geoffroy, because he remained faithful to de Molay and the Temple. Let's not let our imagination run away with us."
"But there may have been some reason he didn't turn the shroud over to the Temple."
"I doubt it. I'm sorry to have confused you; in my opinion it's not a problem of spelling, it's that the two Geoffroys belonged to different families. And even if they were related, that would not account for the family's possession of the shroud, as I've just explained to you."
"I'm going to Lirey."
"Well, that's fine. Anything else?"
"Professor Marchais, thank you-you may not agree, but I think you've just unveiled part of an enigma."
By the time Elianne Marchais saw Ana Jimenez to the door she had once again confirmed her opinion of reporters: shallow, for the most part uneducated, and given to the most idiotic fantasies. It was no wonder there was so much rubbish printed in the newspapers.