“I guess so,” I agreed, “let’s tackle the lawyer first. He’s the most important one, the way things now stand.”
Murray Abernathy, attorney-at-law, was a long, stringy, slow-spoken old gentleman who still clung to starched-bosom shirts. He was too full of what he thought were professional ethics to give us as much help as we had expected; but by letting him talk — letting him ramble along in his own way — we did get a little information from him. What we got amounted to this:
The dead man and Creda Dexter had intended being married the coming Wednesday. His son and her brother were both opposed to the marriage, it seemed, so Gantvoort and the woman had planned to be married secretly in Oakland, and catch a boat for the Orient that same afternoon; figuring that by the time their lengthy honeymoon was over they could return to a son and brother who had become resigned to the marriage.
A new will had been drawn up, leaving half of Gantvoort’s estate to his new wife and half to his son and daughter-in-law. But the new will had not been signed yet, and Creda Dexter knew it had not been signed. She knew — and this was one of the few points upon which Abernathy would make a positive statement — that under the old will, still in force, everything went to Charles Gantvoort and his wife.
The Gantvoort estate, we estimated from Abernathy’s roundabout statements and allusions, amounted to about a million and a half in cash value. The attorney had never heard of Emil Bonfils, he said, and had never heard of any threats or attempts at murder directed toward the dead man. He knew nothing — or would tell us nothing — that threw any light upon the nature of the thing that the threatening letter had accused the dead man of stealing.
From Abernathy’s office we went to Creda Dexter’s apartment, in a new and expensively elegant building only a few minutes’ walk from the Gantvoort residence.
Creda Dexter was a small woman in her early twenties. The first thing you noticed about her were her eyes. They were large and deep and the color of amber, and their pupils were never at rest. Continuously they changed size, expanded and contracted — slowly at times, suddenly at others — ranging incessantly from the size of pinheads to an extent that threatened to blot out the amber irides.
With the eyes for a guide, you discovered that she was pronouncedly feline throughout. Her every movement was the slow, smooth, sure one of a cat; and the contours of her rather pretty face, the shape of her mouth, her small nose, the set of her eyes, the swelling of her brows, were all cat-like. And the effect was heightened by the way she wore her hair, which was thick and tawny.
“Mr. Gantvoort and I,” she told us after the preliminary explanations had been disposed of, “were to have been married the day after tomorrow. His son and daughter-in-law were both opposed to the marriage, as was my brother Madden. They all seemed to think that the difference between our ages was too great. So to avoid any unpleasantness, we had planned to be married quietly and then go abroad for a year or more, feeling sure that they would all have forgotten their grievances by the time we returned.
“That was why Mr. Gantvoort persuaded Madden to go to New York. He had some business there — something to do with the disposal of his interest in a steel mill — so he used it as an excuse to get Madden out of the way until we were off on our wedding trip. Madden lived here with me, and it would have been nearly impossible for me to have made any preparations for the trip without him seeing them.”
“Was Mr. Gantvoort here last night?” I asked her.
“No. I expected him — we were going out. He usually walked over — it’s only a few blocks. When eight o’clock came and he hadn’t arrived, I telephoned his house, and Whipple told me that he had left nearly an hour before. I called up again, twice, after that. Then, this morning, I called up again before I had seen the papers, and I was told that he—”
She broke off with a catch in her voice — the only sign of sorrow she displayed throughout the interview. The impression of her we had received from Charles Gantvoort and Whipple had prepared us for a more or less elaborate display of grief on her part. But she disappointed us. There was nothing crude about her work — she didn’t even turn on the tears for us.
“Was Mr. Gantvoort here night before last?”
“Yes. He came over at a little after eight and stayed until nearly twelve. We didn’t go out.”
“Did he walk over and back?”
“Yes, so far as I know.”
“Did he ever say anything to you about his life being threatened?”
“No.”
She shook her head decisively.
“Do you know Emil Bonfils?”
“No.”
“Ever hear Mr. Gantvoort speak of him?”
“No.”
“At what hotel is your brother staying in New York?”
The restless black pupils spread out abruptly, as if they were about to overflow into the white areas of her eyes. That was the first clear indication of fear I had seen. But, outside of those tell-tale pupils, her composure was undisturbed.
“I don’t know.”
“When did he leave San Francisco?”
“Thursday — four days ago.”
O’Gar and I walked six or seven blocks in thoughtful silence after we left Creda Dexter’s apartment, and then he spoke.
“A sleek kitten — that dame! Rub her the right way, and she’ll purr pretty. Rub her the wrong way — and look out for the claws!”
“What did that flash of her eyes when I asked about her brother tell you?” I asked.
“Something — but I don’t know what! It wouldn’t hurt to look him up and see if he’s really in New York. If he is there today it’s a cinch he wasn’t here last night — even the mail planes take twenty-six or twenty-eight hours for the trip.”
“We’ll do that,” I agreed. “It looks like this Creda Dexter wasn’t any too sure that her brother wasn’t in on the killing. And there’s nothing to show that Bonfils didn’t have help. I can’t figure Creda being in on the murder, though. She knew the new will hadn’t been signed. There’d be no sense in her working herself out of that three-quarters of a million berries.”
We sent a lengthy telegram to the Continental’s New York branch, and then dropped in at the Agency to see if any replies had come to the wires I had got off the night before.
They had.
None of the people whose names appeared on the typewritten list with Gantvoort’s had been found; not the least trace had been found of any of them. Two of the addresses given were altogether wrong. There were no houses with those numbers on those streets — and there never had been.
IV
“Maybe that ain’t so foolish!”
What was left of the afternoon, O’Gar and I spent going over the street between Gantvoort’s house on Russian Hill and the building in which the Dexters lived. We questioned everyone we could find — man, woman and child — who lived, worked, or played along any of the three routes the dead man could have taken.
We found nobody who had heard the shot that had been fired by Bonfils on the night before the murder. We found nobody who had seen anything suspicious on the night of the murder. Nobody who remembered having seen him picked up in a coupe.
Then we called at Gantvoort’s house and questioned Charles Gantvoort again, his wife, and all the servants — and we learned nothing. So far as they knew, nothing belonging to the dead man was missing — nothing small enough to be concealed in the heel of a shoe.
The shoes he had worn the night he was killed were one of three pairs made in New York for him two months before. He could have removed the heel of the left one, hollowed it out sufficiently to hide a small object in it, and then nailed it on again; though Whipple insisted that he would have noticed the effects of any tampering with the shoe unless it had been done by an expert repairman.