While the kettle heated, I looked out the window at the sad, bare garden. I couldn’t remember how I had slid from happiness to resignation. Inside I was nothing but gray, and it had stiffened my muscles and my aptitude for joy. My mother had died in 1959. She lay in the Princeton cemetery a short distance from the house. We had already reserved the plot next to it for us. That spring, Marianne and Rudolf had returned to Princeton. They now showed up every two years. Nothing was more predictable than a Gödel. In June I’d managed to drag Kurt to the seashore. We quickly came home: too cold, too many people. This past summer of ’63, I’d chosen Canada, and the previous years I’d gone to Italy. When I got back, we celebrated our silver wedding anniversary. Marianne hadn’t even sent us a telegram of congratulations. I wasn’t surprised, but Kurt’s feelings were hurt. Twenty-five years of married life, ten years of living together secretly: an eternity, the sackcloth anniversary. The endlessness of daily life chafes one’s skin.
That morning, in preparation for Paul Cohen’s visit, I had tried to put makeup on my unfamiliar face. Those jowls, those wrinkles — was this really my body? The eyeliner no longer stuck to my sagging eyelids. The time had come to renounce war paint. I had become a fat old lady. Only my port-wine stain had stayed faithful. I wrote out lists of things to do, so as not to lose my footing. I gardened, I embroidered, I decorated the hermit’s lair. Kurt had complained about his office. I gave him my bedroom in exchange for his, because it had better light. Happy to have a mission, I arranged for a magnificent glass-fronted bookcase to be installed in his office. My armchair by the kitchen window was homeland enough for me; my little battery of house-cleaning items was family enough. Penny had died the spring before. I didn’t have the heart to replace her. I had adopted a pair of lovebirds and two stray cats. I had christened the big red cat “God”: he would hide on the top of a wardrobe and disappear for days at a time without a trace.
Why do people say that simple spirits are the most likely to find happiness? This little dancer never did. The day before, I went out on a few errands — my big adventure for the week — and stopped to look at a little girl of about ten. She was wholly absorbed in admiring her new shoes. Just then her mother emerged from a store and motioned to her to follow with a peremptory, affectionless gesture: “Stand straight, Anna!” Stung, the little girl lifted her head sadly and squared her shoulders. All her joy had evaporated at her mother’s command. I’d wanted to rush to her and take her in my arms: “Don’t give up, little girl! Never give up!” I had gone home dragging my shopping bag. I was reduced to watching other people’s children grow up.
I reentered carrying a tray. Two teas and a hot water. I watched my husband break a lump of sugar, study the pieces, and choose the smaller. For thirty years I’d watched him interrogate himself over his sugar ration. What would have happened if I’d just plopped the larger piece into his cup? Would the world have come to an end?
“Do you mind if I sit with you for a bit? The television might just decide to give us some fresh news.”
“Just as you please.”
The truth was, I was glad for a little company. It didn’t matter to me if I seemed intrusive. Our reputation in Princeton was already firmly in place: the madman and his shrew.
Our visitor was gripping his tea tightly. Unsure how to start the conversation, he opted for flattery. He thanked Kurt emphatically for his help in fine-tuning his article. Actually, Kurt’s sense of duty had left him no choice. Cohen had made considerable progress where my husband had fallen short twenty years earlier. Kurt had broken the news to me as he read his maiclass="underline" “A certain Paul Cohen has just proved that the continuum hypothesis is undecidable. Did you remember to buy milk?” I was careful not to show any emotion. I foresaw the anxiety attack that was bound to follow. How would he take being beaten to the punch, when he had held off publishing his own, earlier proof? He’d been deterred by his fear of detractors. I knew that his inner sense of perfection was by far the most intransigent censor. Yet according to his colleagues, Kurt was God the Father to all the young logicians. Science is an exercise in humility: he was forced to admit that he was only a humble link in the chain. Before him Cantor, after him Cohen. How did it feel to be confronted with a new version of himself? Did his greatness give him the right to feel resentment? For this was an abdication. Although he had carried the child for two decades, another man would claim its paternity. What fate was in store for this young man who dared approach the light? Would it cost him his vitality, as it had his elders?
“This work will win you a Fields Medal, Mr. Cohen.”60
“You’re flattering me. No logician has ever won the Fields. Not even you!”
“I was always passed over when it came to honors.”
I rolled my eyes. Who would Kurt ever fool into believing that? Other than the Fields Medal, he had already received everything a mathematician could hope for.
“What subject will you now turn to, having climbed this considerable mountain?”
“There is plenty to keep me busy. I’ve been offered a good position at Stanford. I love teaching. And I’m thinking of attacking Riemann’s hypothesis.”61
“You’re very optimistic, my boy. But the question of the continuum is not settled. Its undecidability only proves that we don’t have powerful enough tools. We’re still at the very beginning.”
“Do you still hold to the theory of the missing axioms?”
“Your real work as a logician is just starting. You must continue to make the edifice stronger.”
“Isn’t it your edifice too? What are you working on, Dr. Gödel?”
“It’s no secret. I am devoting myself wholly to philosophy. You have demonstrated the undecidability of the continuum hypothesis. I am asking myself about its significance from a philosophical perspective.”
“Are you moving away from pure logic?”
“Philosophy, in my view, must be approached as logic is, axiomatically.”
“I don’t see how you can axiomatize conceptions of the world that are neither universal nor time-independent.”
“Ideas have objective reality. We must devise a nonsubjective language suited to this reality. That is why for years I have been studying Husserl’s phenomenology and its specific applicability to mathematics.”
I signaled the young man discreetly, but he failed to catch my meaning and handed me his empty cup. Now we were doomed to two hours of phenomenology. Luckily, Kurt’s alarm went off just at that moment.
“Please excuse me. It’s time for my medications. I follow a very strict protocol. I’ll be back in a few minutes.”
Paul Cohen was making a serious effort not to appear thrown off by the direction the conversation had taken.
“Do you take much interest in phenimo … phenoli … Damn! The thing is unpronounceable!”
“Incomprehensible too. Is your husband unwell?”
“Pay no attention. He has his pharmaceutical habits. Are you married?”
“I just got married. I met my wife in Stockholm last year. Christina is Swedish.”
“You don’t think that was a little hasty?”
“Happiness won’t wait!”
Had this joyful boy really succeeded where Kurt had failed? Blue Hill suddenly seemed a long way off. Would this sweet kid turn to his Christina one day and say, “I’m having problems”? I was moved by this respectful and enthusiastic young man. I saw in him a vague echo, more solidly fleshed, of what my husband had been. Kurt looked so fragile beside him, so old.
I too had been surprised when Kurt told me that he’d invited Paul Cohen to tea. We no longer invited anyone to visit. Kurt avoided all direct contact with others, even our close friends. It didn’t stop him from calling them at all hours of the night and inflicting long philosophical conversations on them. He avoided public life completely, justifying his unsociable withdrawal by pointing to his precarious health. He had even turned down honors from the University of Vienna and the Austrian government, declined the chance to return as a conqueror. What was he afraid of? That someone would make an attempt on his precious life? That they would induct him by force into the Wehrmacht? That world no longer existed. Unfortunately, he didn’t see time as a flowing stream but as a muddy pond. Everything was mixed together in it, rotting away. My own view was that time had become a viscous substance full of indigestible lumps of habit, a broth one had to swallow despite one’s nausea. His cup of hot water in the morning, his cup of hot water in the evening, the untouched meal, the silence. The accounts on Sunday, and the newspaper left on the seat, always in the same place.