The judge has his robe off and boots up on the desk. There are a few cardboard boxes with books still in them on the floor, near his chair, Radovich’s traveling library. For all the use these are to the man, we could set them on fire.
I can see that the single volume of the Penal Code Radovich carries is two years out of date. The judge no doubt operates on the theory that like fine wine, new pronouncements of the legislature should mellow awhile before their fruits are tasted.
Lenore, Harry, and I sit like set pieces on the sofa. Kline and one of his deputies occupy the two client chairs.
“I hope this is something we can deal with quickly,” says Radovich. “I have a luncheon with the presiding judge.”
Kline tells him he will move with dispatch, but that it is a serious matter he is bringing before the court.
“It troubles me to have to raise the issue,” he says. An ominous tone.
“What is it?” says the judge.
“Conflict of interest,” says Kline. “Involving Ms. Goya.”
“Aw, shit. I don’t believe this.” Lenore is up from the sofa, and for a moment I think perhaps she is going to sink her fingernails into the back of Kline’s head.
Radovich looks at her like he’s never heard a woman say the S-word before.
“What are you talking about?” says Lenore.
“I’m talking about your representation of our office in the initial prostitution matter. Your interview of Ms. Hall in the office. Your access to confidential working papers and files in the solicitation charges against the defendant in this case. I’m talking about serious conflict,” he says.
“Give me a break,” she says. Lenore rolling her eyes, treating this with all the deference one might give to a squalling schoolchild.
She calls it a trumped-up issue, and complains about Kline’s delay in bringing the matter before the court, waiting until the eve of trial.
“There’s nothing trumped up about it,” says Kline.
“I think both of you should calm down,” says Radovich. “First things first,” he says. “I think we should have the court reporter in here before we go any further.” He issues a directive to the bailiff.
“I would suggest that the defendant should hear this as well,” says Kline. “It affects his representation.”
Radovich concurs and calls for Acosta to be brought in.
Through all of this Harry and I are sitting, nearly stage struck by what we are hearing. It is not that we did not see the problem. We had all discussed the potential of conflict in our earlier meeting at the office. But we thought that when Kline didn’t raise it in preliminary motions, the matter was deemed waived.
The court reporter is ushered in. She sets up her stenograph machine, and they roll in a secretarial chair.
Acosta is brought in by two of the jail guards. He is half-undressed, a T-shirt above suit pants, suspenders dangling behind him. He is clearly ill at ease to be seen in public this way, and Radovich apologizes and instructs one of the guards to get him a coat. The other guard brings in a chair for their prisoner, and then the two stand sentry inside the door.
While he’s putting on the coat he shoots a glance our way. “What is going on?” he whispers.
Lenore is too agitated to answer, and is at this moment edging toward Radovich’s desk for position.
“The prosecutor has raised an issue of conflict regarding Ms. Goya,” I tell him.
“Oh.” It is all he says, but the sober look on Acosta’s face tells me that he is weighing the consequences of this as it might affect his own fate.
The court reporter feeds a little piece of fan-folded paper into her machine, and we are ready.
“Now,” says Radovich. The signal for Kline to start.
“The people make formal motion,” says Kline, “that Lenore Goya be disqualified from participating in the defense of this matter based upon a conflict of interest. It is very simple,” he says. “It is our position that she has represented adverse interests in this case, and as such has compromised herself. The law,” he says, “is clear.”
He hands the judge documents, points, and authorities, citing the facts of alleged conflict and cases in point, the stuff he poked me in the ass with three minutes earlier.
Lenore can no longer restrain herself. “What is this? We are given no notice or opportunity to be heard?” she says.
I’m on my feet and join her at the edge of Radovich’s desk. A show of unity.
“If we could, Your Honor. We have not seen these documents.”
“Right,” says Radovich. “You got copies for opposing counsel?” Radovich clearly does not like the tactic; trial by ambush, and Kline is filled with remorse for the oversight. He chastises his subordinate for the error, and blames the man for the infraction of legal etiquette.
Kline’s fall guy rifles through his briefcase and comes up with two more copies. Stapled there are a dozen pages, cases underlined, a double-spaced argument.
The issue is clear-cut. Rules of professional ethics in this state bar a lawyer from representing two parties with adverse interests in the same legal action, civil or criminal. While there are fine points and nuances in the way the rules are applied, the penalty for a conflict is removal from the case, disqualification of counsel.
“There may be little question about what the rule says,” I tell Radovich, “but there is a serious question of waiver. Why did the prosecutor wait until the eve of trial to raise this issue?”
“A good point,” says the judge. “You are now threatening a delay, Mr. Kline.”
“I see no reason for any delay,” says Kline. “The defendant is ably represented. More than one lawyer,” he says. He is alluding to Harry and me.
“Not me,” says Hinds. “I never agreed to participate that fully.”
“Well, you’re here,” says Kline. “You’re being paid, aren’t you?”
“Not nearly enough,” says Harry.
Acosta gives him a dirty look, an imperious sneer.
“I wish to make something clear,” says Acosta. “I am not waiving time.” What he means is that he is still demanding a speedy trial.
Kline tries to draw our client into a dialogue and I intervene to cut this off. Failing this, Kline tells us that a speedy trial is not an issue, since the trial has already commenced with the selection of jurors.
He launches off on further argument.
“We believe that Ms. Goya is possessed of certain privileged information,” says Kline, “that she would not have except for her prior employment with my office. This places the people in a disadvantaged position.”
“The only disadvantage the people are suffering from is the incompetence of their lawyer,” says Lenore.
“Yes. Well, you’re the one charged with conflict,” says Kline. “Perhaps you should bone up on legal ethics.”
“Stop it now.” Radovich reaches for the first thing at hand, and slams a heavy metal paperweight on the top of the desk, putting a dent in the wood. He looks at this, and now utters the S-word himself.
“Charlie’s gonna kill me,” he says. He has borrowed Charlie Johnson’s courtroom for this trial and has now put an indelible mark in the top of his desk.
“Why don’t we do this in open court?” says Lenore.
“Why don’t you both shut up,” says Radovich. “And somebody find me some furniture polish,” he says, “and a rag.” He issues a frantic wave at the bailiff, who disappears into the other room.
I shudder to think what a court of appeal will conclude from this record.
It is clear why Kline has chosen to air this linen, here in the privacy of the judge’s chambers. A public argument would raise questions as to the running of his own office, the circumstances of Lenore’s departure, and perhaps questions about disgruntled prosecutors that Kline would like to avoid.
“Why did you wait so long to bring this up?” says Radovich. He’s rubbing at the wound in the desk with his thumb, drops a little spit on it, and tries again.