Is this another instance of the simple and familiar story of the strong passions of youth being supplanted by the more tepid judgements of old age? In part, perhaps. His views on the abolition of the fast of 30 January commemorating the execution of Charles I show an understanding on Johnson’s part of how political emotions necessarily wane, and of how in consequence politics can never be conducted sub specie aeternitatis: ‘Why, Sir, I could have wished that it had been a temporary act, perhaps, to have expired with the century. I am against abolishing it; because that would be declaring it was wrong to establish it; but I should have no objection to make an act, continuing it for another century, and then letting it expire.’113 The misfortunes of the House of Stuart had, for Johnson, no permanent claim on the attention, sympathy and – most important – loyalty, of the nation.
Boswell supposed that Johnson was inclined to display more Jacobitism than he really felt, and he connected that to Johnson’s disposition towards combativeness:
There was here, most certainly, an affectation of more Jacobitism than he really had; and indeed an intention of admitting, for the moment, in a much greater extent than it really existed, the charge of disaffection imputed to him by the world, merely for the purpose of shewing how dexterously he could repel an attack, even though he were placed in the most disadvantageous position; for I have heard him declare, that if holding up his right hand would have secured victory at Culloden to Prince Charles’s army, he was not sure he would have held it up; so little confidence had he in the right claimed by the house of Stuart, and so fearful was he of the consequences of another revolution on the throne of Great-Britain; and Mr. Topham Beauclerk assured me, he had heard him say this before he had his pension. At another time he said to Mr. Langton, ‘Nothing has ever offered, that has made it worth my while to consider the question fully.’ He, however, also said to the same gentleman, talking of King James the Second, ‘It was become impossible for him to reign any longer in this country.’ He no doubt had an early attachment to the House of Stuart; but his zeal had cooled as his reason strengthened. Indeed I heard him once say, that ‘after the death of a violent Whig, with whom he used to contend with great eagerness, he felt his Toryism much abated.’114
Even Johnson’s juvenile Toryism has in it a trace of contrariness, since it is capable of being construed as a sturdy rejection on Johnson’s part of the political attitudes common amongst the young: ‘all boys love liberty, till experience convinces them they are not so fit to govern themselves as they imagined.’115 So in this respect the movement in Johnson’s political opinions traced the common course, only in reverse. In later life, Johnson could be moved to the strident Jacobitism and anti-Hanoverianism of his youth only by egregious Whiggery – as happened, for instance, on 17 September 1777, over dinner with his friend Dr John Taylor of Ashbourne.116 Provoked by Taylor and moved by ‘the spirit of contradiction’, Johnson rewound the years and vigorously re-entered the vivid Jacobitism of his earlier days.117 But one suspects that, for Johnson, the political substance of the conversation was only a pretext which allowed him once again to reap the emotional and intellectual benefits which, for him, flowed from intellectual collision.
To feel a strong and strengthening flow of opinion may be to feel both stronger and simpler than, in reality, you are. Johnson’s defiant and energetic simplicity of manner was the product of habit and will, as he explained to Reynolds:
Sir Joshua Reynolds once asked him by what means he had attained his extraordinary accuracy and flow of language. He told him, that he had early laid it down as a fixed rule to do his best on every occasion, and in every company; to impart whatever he knew in the most forcible language he could put it in; and that by constant practice, and never suffering any careless expressions to escape him, or attempting to deliver his thoughts without arranging them in the clearest manner, it became habitual to him.118
This relentless disciplining of the self in the direction of care, forcefulness and premeditation suggests a congenital deficit of those qualities. Boswell tells us that Johnson’s mind was naturally ‘gloomy and impetuous’, and given to melancholic anxiety: ‘To Johnson, whose supreme enjoyment was the exercise of his reason, the disturbance or obscuration of that faculty was the evil most to be dreaded. Insanity, therefore, was the object of his most dismal apprehension; and he fancied himself seized by it, or approaching to it, at the very time when he was giving proofs of a more than ordinary soundness and vigour of judgement.’119 But if the exercise of soundness and vigour of judgement is displayed as the deliberate remedy for an underlying ailment, then nothing is more likely than that it should follow so closely upon, and even appear to coincide with, ‘dismal appre-hension’.120
Johnson’s religious faith also lends itself to being construed not as the straightforward fruit of a fundamental conviction, but rather as the antagonist that Johnson employed against an underlying scepticism. That he was not originally of a religious disposition was something which Johnson frankly confessed to Boswelclass="underline"
‘I fell into an inattention to religion, or an indifference about it, in my ninth year. The church at Lichfield, in which we had a seat, wanted reparation, so I was to go and find a seat in other churches; and having bad eyes, and being awkward about this, I used to go and read in the fields on Sunday. This habit continued till my fourteenth year; and still I find a great reluctance to go to church. I then became a sort of lax talker against religion, for I did not much think against it; and this lasted till I went to Oxford, where it would not be suffered. When at Oxford, I took up Law’s Serious Call to a Holy Life, expecting to find it a dull book (as such books generally are), and perhaps to laugh at it. But I found Law quite an overmatch for me; and this was the first occasion of my thinking in earnest of religion, after I became capable of rational inquiry.’ From this time forward religion was the predominant object of his thoughts; though, with the just sentiments of a conscientious Christian, he lamented that his practice of its duties fell far short of what it ought to be.121
Not steady faith and a confidence in salvation, but a troubled meditation on the likelihood of being ‘Sent to Hell, Sir, and punished everlastingly’ – this is the keynote of Johnson’s religion.122 It is therefore revealing that Johnson’s first expression of liking for Boswell follows immediately upon Boswell’s confession of religious doubts:
I acknowledged, that though educated very strictly in the principles of religion, I had for some time been misled into a certain degree of infidelity; but that I was come now to a better way of thinking, and was fully satisfied of the truth of the Christian revelation, though I was not clear as to every point considered to be orthodox. Being at all times a curious examiner of the human mind, and pleased with an undisguised display of what had passed in it, he called to me with warmth, ‘Give me your hand; I have taken a liking to you.’123
What Johnson warms to in Boswell is the shadow of his own religious misgivings and imperfections. This strenuous conforming of his mind and conduct to an ideal of belief explains why Johnson was so irritated by even dispassionate speculation on subjects such as the doctrine of the Trinity or predestination and theodicy, and perhaps also why he would occasionally speak affectionately about Roman Catholicism. On some subjects, freedom of inquiry entailed unwelcome psychological risks.124 The relentless disciplining of the mind to an external standard both allowed Johnson to control his psychological turbulence and at the same time brought him up hard against something outside himself which both checked and confirmed him. This perhaps also explains Johnson’s lifelong affinity for the law. He was always prone to giving energetic expression to cases which were not, in the fullest sense, his own.125