I grew to self-awareness at the end of the 1880’s. It was an uncommonly dreary time, without a single bright moment of political struggle. In a revolutionary sense, society was completely bloodless. It resembled a clear-cut forest in which once mighty oaks were reduced to stumps. There remained only legends of “socialists” and “nihilists” who once had gone out to rouse “the people” and who served as examples of how to resist all power and laws whether God’s or man’s by use of the dagger, bomb, and revolver. A romantic mist shrouded these enigmatic and daring people. Everyone spoke of them with Philistine condemnation and also with a kind of inadvertent esteem. And this impressed youthful imaginations.
For me, growing up motherless under the daily and hourly oppression of a classical “stepmother,” escaping from her persecution into the kitchen, the servants’ room, the banks of the Volga, into the company of street kids, it was completely natural to absorb love for the people, especially as it was expressed in the poetry of Nekrasov. I knew almost all his works by heart.
Since I was myself constantly “humiliated and injured,” I was naturally drawn to all those who had been “humiliated and injured” as well. This was my world and in unison with it I set myself against “the reigning injustice.” Nekrasov broadened this world for me. Thanks to him, this world grew from the servants’ room and my restless street buddies to include the world of all common people, peasants, and laborers.
Chapter Two
Sergei N. Durylin, Domestic Love
Born to a merchant family, Sergei Durylin broke with that world to become a person of enormous erudition. Known for a gentle manner and kindness, traits always mentioned by his friends and colleagues, he was also remembered for his accomplishments in theater, literature, archeology, art criticism, and philology. His memoirs are finely drawn. The selection chosen illustrates a family life in style, habit, and sensibility which disappeared after the 1917 revolution. Taken from S.N. Durylin, V svoem uglu [In One’s Own Corner]. Moscow: Moskovskii rabochii, 1991.
Seventeen years after the death of my mother, I opened for the first time a small pile of his [her first husband’s] letters which she had carefully preserved.
There turned out to be very few of his letters. They were her letters to him. Her, the bride’s, letters were full of deep feeling, strong in their clarity and simplicity: “I am all yours.” “All is in you.” “All is with you.” “All is for you.”
And she’s always waiting for his letters, but he never has enough time. He’s handsome, his mother’s darling, the darling of his family. He loves her, but he doesn’t have a thoughtful heart. His love is always “seeking its own” and it doesn’t think, it doesn’t even see its counterpart. It’s a love with eyes open to itself and closed to the loved one. And the love of the loved one “suffers quietly” and won’t raise a hand to open his eyes. Oh, it’s bitter to love a person with closed eyes! And my mother drank up this bitterness to the dregs. And her love was so great that it strangled another feeling, growing in her towards a different person.
Sergei N. Durylin, Domestic Love
19
I was sorry that I had untied the scarlet ribbon that had at one time held together this pile of old letters. I felt sorrow, pain, distress. But when I think that everything was covered with love, when I remember that my mother never, to my knowledge, reproached the person who gave her so little happiness and so much suffering—when I once again imagine with how much love she would always remember his love, and how joyful she perceived her first love to be, and how thankful she was to him for this love, I thank my mother for this pile of letters from years long gone. She gave me, an old man, a great lesson of a great love, one which “suffers quietly” and forgives all. And I’m glad that I bear the first name of this unhappy, kind, and noble man, whose burden (and not his fault) was that he lived by “a single law declaring / The passions’ arbitrary cues.”1
After the death of Sergei Sergeevich, my mother remained at her mother’s-in-law. Her life was difficult. Childless, she couldn’t take root in the family, and without those roots she couldn’t become a true member of it. Her mother-in-law respected her, but this imperious woman, fortune’s favorite, harbored neither love nor warm feeling for anyone.
Olga Vasilievna needed my mother. She was bringing up orphans, a boy and a girl, the children of her deceased daughter. She did not entrust their upbringing to their father. My mother raised them. They were difficult children who nonetheless made out well for themselves.
My mother lived on Bolvanovka Street as the widow of the favorite son of Olga Vasilievna, but she never received so much as pocket money from her. And all the while her heart was being torn apart by troubles: her father, Vasily Alekseevich, couldn’t support his family and soon died. My grandmother and my aunt were left without any means. My mother had to make up her mind to do something, so as not to leave her mother without bread. And make up her mind she did: she married my father.
This was a heroic deed in the true sense of the word. She did it for her mother.
My father was a widower, twenty years older than my mother. She didn’t marry him out of love; she only knew that she was marrying an honest and good person. She took upon herself a huge family—by today’s standards, ridiculously huge: my father had eleven children, of which only the eldest daughter was married. All the rest—six daughters and four sons—lived with their father. The older ones could have been my mother’s younger brothers and sisters, and the youngest one was four years old. The heavy burden of raising and managing this enormous family, which took up two floors of a spacious house in Pleteshki, carried with it the no-less-difficult burden of managing a house that was almost the size of an estate. And my mother
20
Chapter Two
entered into all of this at the age of thirty, in the bloom of her youth, which was cut off at the root. Here too she carried her burden with honor.
Of my father’s marriageable daughters only one had been given away in marriage, and unsuccessfully at that: the husband drank, leaving her without any means, and she came back to her father’s house, so that all of my father’s eleven children wound up in my mother’s care after all. During my father’s life my mother married off three daughters, all into happy marriages and even wealth. When the children from the first marriage left my father after he went broke, only one of the three remaining marriageable daughters managed to get married. The dowry for the oldest of them had already been prepared by my mother, and her stepdaughter took it with her.
My father’s older sons did not receive an education. The eldest son, Nikolai Nikolaevich, was at business trade school just long enough to get his feet wet, and the second son didn’t even get into the water at some boarding school. I remember my father saying that kids only needed to be taught “readin,’ ‘ritin,’ and ‘rithmetic,” and then—off to business, to trade! My mother vehemently protested this and insisted that the two younger sons, whom she had raised, not only finish high school, but also university. One was an assistant to the famous Plevako [a leading jurist], and the other, an engineer.