5B. T., introd., p. xvii.
6Quoted by Mencken, p. 18.
7Letter to Brandes, in Huneker, Egoists, New York, 1910; p. 251.
8In Halévy, Life of Friedrich Nietzsche, London, 1911; p. 106.
9In Förster-Nietzsche, The Young Nietzsche, London, 1912; p. 235.
10It falls in with their later break that Wagner wrote about the same time an essay “On the Evolution of Music Out of the Drama” (Prose Works, vol. x).
11B. T., 50, 183.
12P. 62.
13The Wagner-Nietzsche Correspondence, New York, 1921; p. 167.
14B. T., 114.
15P. 102.
16“Know thyself” and “nothing in excess.”
17B. T., 182.
18P. 113.
19P. 95.
20B. T., 150.
21In Halévy, 169.
22Ibid., 151.
23Ibid.
24“Schopenhauer as Educator,” sect. 8.
25Ibid., sect. 6.
26T. O. S., i, 117.
27Ibid., 104.
28The Wagner-Nietzsche Correspondence, p. 223.
29T. O. S., i, 122.
30Nietzsche considered Wagner’s father to be Ludwig Geyer, a Jewish actor.
31The Wagner-Nietzsche Correspondence, p. 279.
32In Halévy, p. 191.
33Correspondence, p. 310.
34Ibid., p. 295.
35C. W., pp. 46, 27, 9, 2; cf. Faguet, p. 21.
36Quoted in Ellis, Affirmations, London, 1898; p. 27.
37Cf. Z., pp. 258–264, and 364–374, which refer to Wagner.
38Cf. Correspondence, p. 311.
39T. O. S., ii, 122.
40The Lonely Nietzsche, p. 65.
41Z., 212.
42In Halévy, 234.
43Z., 315.
44Z., 279.
45Z., 1.
46E. H., 97.
47E. H., 106.
48Halévy, 261.
49Z., 4.
50A hit at Wagner’s Götterdämmerung.
51Z., 263.
52Z., 116–8.
53Z., 245.
54Z., 5.
55Z., 457.
56Z., 162.
57Z., 354.
58Z., 376.
59Z., 434.
60Z., 108 (and 419), 5, 8, 11, 79, 80.
61Z., 423–6.
62Z., 341.
63Z., 210.
64In Figgis, The Will to Freedom, New York, 1917; p. 249.
65Cf. Taine, The French Revolution, New York, 1885; vol. iii, p. 94.
66B. G. E., 117.
67Ibid., 121–3.
68D. D., 232.
69C. W., 9, quoting Benjamin Constant: “Love is of all feelings the most egoistic; and in consequence it is, when crossed, the least generous.” But Nietzsche can speak more gently of love. “Whence arises the sudden passion of a man for a woman? . . . Least of all from sensuality only: but when a man finds weakness, need of help, and high spirits, all united in the same creature, he suffers a sort of over-flowing of soul, and is touched and offended at the same moment. At this point arises the source of great love” (H. A. H., ii, 287). And he quotes from the French “the chastest utterance I ever heard: Dans le veritable amour c’est l’âme qui enveloppe le corps”—“in true love it is the soul that embraces the body.”
70H. A. H., ii, 26; B. G. E., 9; J. W., 258; B. G. E., 162; W. P., ii, 38.
71B. G. E., 128, 14, 177; W. P., i, 228; G. M., 46, 100. The student of psychology may be interested to follow up psychoanalytic sources in H. A. H., i, 23–27 and D. D., 125–131 (theory of dreams); H. A. H., i, 215 (Adler’s theory of the neurotic constitution); and D. D., 293 (“overcorrection”). Those who are interested in pragmatism will find a fairly complete anticipation of it in B. G. E., 9, 50, 53; and W. P., ii, 20, 24, 26, 50.
72B. G. E., 165 (quoting John Stuart Mill), 59; W. P., i, 308; Z., 421.
73G. M., 73; B.G. E., 177; Z., 317.
74D. D., 84; Ellis, 50; B. G. E., 121.
75W. P., ii, 387, 135; H. A. H., i, 375.
76Cf. Z., 104.
77W. P., ii, 158.
78Z., 94.
79W. P., ii, 353; B. G. E., 260; Z., 49, 149.
80Z., 60, 222; Antichrist, 128; W. P., ii, 257.
81D. D., 295, 194–7; T. I., 57; W. P., ii, 221–2, 369, 400; “Schopenhauer as Educator,” sect. I.
82Quoted in Salter, 446.
83Z., 107.
84Antichrist, 195; Ellis, 49–50; W. P., ii, 313.
85G. M., 40.
86Antichrist, 228.
87Figgis, 47, note; T. I., 51.
88Salter, 464–7; E. H., 37, 83; B. G. E., 213–6; T. I., 54; Faguet, 10–11.
89G. M., 98; B. G. E., 146, 208; Salter, 469.
90W. P., i, 382–4; ii, 206; Z., 141.
91Z., 248, 169; Huneker, Egoists, 266.
92Lonely Nietzsche, 77, 313; Z., 232.
93Z., 137–8; B. G. E., 226; W. P., i, 102 (which predicts a revolution “compared with which the Paris Commune . . . will seem to have been but a slight indigestion”); ii, 208; D. D., 362. Nietzsche, when he wrote these aristocratic passages, was living in a dingy attic on $1000 a year, most of which went into the publication of his books.
94T. O. S., i, 142; H. A. H., i, 360; ii, 147, 340; T. I., 100; Z., 64, 305, 355.
95J. W., 77–8; B. G. E., 121; Faguet, 22; H. A. H., ii, 288.
96G. M., 255 (this prediction was written in 1887).
97Antichrist, 219–220.
98Z., 159.
99When did this poor exile re-enter?
100Quoted by Nordau, Degeneration, New York, 1895; p. 439.
101W. P., ii, 353, 362–4, 371, 422; B. G. E., 239; T. O. S., ii, 39; Z., 413.
102E. H., 2.
103E. H., 39. Nietzsche thought himself a Pole.
104Figgis, 230, 56.
105Cf. Santayana, Egotism in German Philosophy.
106E.g., cf. Halévy, 231.
107B. T., 6, xxv.
108Quoted by Huneker, Egoists, 251.
109Quoted by Faguet, 9.
110Cf. B. T., pp. 1 and 4 of the Introduction.
111B. T., 142.
112Cf. Santayana, 141.
113In Halévy, 192.
114Cf. Nordau, Degeneration, 451, for a rather hectic attack on Nietzsche as an imaginative sadist.
115Z., 99–100.
116Carlyle, Past and Present, New York, 1901.
117“In my youth,” says Nietzsche somewhere, “I flung at the world with Yea and Nay; now in my old age I do penance for it.”
118Though of course the essentials of Nietzsche’s ethic are to be found in Plato, Machiavelli, Hobbes, La Rochefoucauld, and even in the Vautrin of Balzac’s Père Goriot.
119Simmel.
120The extensive influence of Nietzsche on contemporary literature will need no pointing out to those who are familiar with the writings of Artzibashef, Strindberg, Przybyszewski, Hauptmann, Dehmel, Hamsun, and d’Annunzio.