Выбрать главу

"Here is my warrant card, which is issued under the joint authority of the Ministry of Defence and the Home Office."

"A foreign power?" Nayler whispered the words as though only hearing them from his own lips would make them real to him.

"Time's up. Professor Stephen Adrian Nayler, I arrest you—"

"No—this is ridiculous!" Nayler squeaked.

"That's one thing it isn't. Professor Stephen Adrian Nayler—"

"I didn't mean that!" The jerky wave was abject now, not insulting. "I mean— I didn't understand—I didn't realise this was a matter of national security, Audley."

"Why the hell did you think I got rid of the police, you fool?"

dummy5

said Audley contemptuously. "For old times' sake?"

"I ... no ... I don't know." Nayler licked his lips. There was no room left on his face for anything except fear now. "But I didn't—"

"Shut up. And sit down, Professor."

Nayler sat down as though strings holding him up had been cut.

The very completeness of his collapse steadied Audley. This was how it must be in the Lubianka when the KGB man spoke; or how it had been in Fresnes when the Gestapo ruled there—

Saditye, Professor!

Setzen Sie sich, Professor!

The comparison wasn't flattering, it was sickening—not even the thought of Henry Digby could quite take the sickness away.

"Audley—I had no idea ..." Nayler trailed off helplessly.

Audley swallowed. "You talked to Sergeant Digby about Standingham?"

"Yes." Nayler nodded.

"Did you tell anyone else about your conversation?"

"Only young Ratcliffe—" Nayler stopped abruptly as the implication of what he had said became clear to him

"Only . . . Ratcliffe," he repeated in a whisper.

"Why him?"

dummy5

"Why . . ." Nayler blinked. "Well . . . I was surprised—I was worried that someone had come so close to our hypothesis about the storming of the castle . . . as the sergeant had done." He paused. "I mean, some of these amateurs are extremely knowledgeable—and he was a member of the Double R Society. . . . But it was disquieting nevertheless."

"Disquieting? Why was it disquieting?"

"Because we didn't want our secret to be known before the re-enactment of the battle—and my television programme. That would have spoilt the whole thing, you see. There would have been no surprise then. In fact there was no real danger of it, because after I'd spoken to the sergeant he promised not to leak his ideas, but I thought Ratcliffe ought to know about it even though there was no danger any more."

"Except to the sergeant," murmured Audley.

"I beg your pardon?"

So that was how Digby had made Nayler talk, thought Audley. By accident or design he had provided himself with the right lever.

"It doesn't matter. So what was your secret, then?" And there was another painful truth: young Digby had fashioned his lever out of pure knowledge, whereas clever David Audley had required the crude blunt instrument of the State bully.

"Our hypothesis?" Nayler's voice was almost back to normal.

"Yes . . . well, how much do you know about the Standingham affair, Audley?"

dummy5

"I've read what the Reverend Horatio Musgrave wrote about it, that's all."

"Indeed? Well, that's quite a lot really. In fact you might say that most of the basic clues are there . . . like one of those children's puzzles with the faces hidden in the picture, you might say."

"I've also assumed that Ratcliffe took his gold out of the site of the old crater, from under the monument. Is that correct?"

Nayler nodded. "Absolutely correct. A sort of double bluff—

that was quite clever of you in the circumstances."

Double bluff, certainly. But not nearly clever enough, Audley thought sadly. Not clever at all.

"Yes, well, we see it—that is, Ratcliffe and I see it—as a story of treachery and murder, Audley. Treachery and murder in a good cause perhaps, but nonetheless treachery and murder . . . Colonel Nathaniel Parrott was a very ruthless man as well as a brave one. He couldn't get the gold out of Standingham, but he couldn't allow it to fall into Royalist hands—it might have changed the whole course of the war.

So it wasn't enough to hide it, he had to make sure no one survived to tell the tale."

"Meaning—he set the explosion?"

"Correct. It's possible that he and Steyning planned the explosion together, of course. But if so then Parrott contrived it prematurely, while all those who were privy to the burial were in the powder magazine, including Steyning. Or maybe dummy5

they were in the shot-casting shed, which was next door, it doesn't matter."

"I see. So that was the murder. Where does the treachery come in?"

"Ah, well you'll remember what Musgrave said—what was it?

—'Parrott took to horse and essayed to escape (and who shall cry "faint heart" or "treachery" in such an extremity?) . . .'.

Even Musgrave suspected that Parrott was just a little too ready to break out, you see. That reference to treachery is an old tradition in the story, too. And there was also the fact that the Royalist forces did seem to be ready and waiting to attack at exactly that point, where the great cannon was dismounted by the explosion."

"So they'd been tipped off in advance?"

"It does very much look like that. They'd never tried to attack from that side before."

"Because of the great cannon?"

"No, not really. Steyning was always firing it, but he never hit anything—'he vexed us not at all', one of the Royalists wrote.

No, it was because the valley bottom is marshy there, and with the field of fire in that open country they wouldn't have had a chance of getting across the marshy ground without taking unacceptable losses. But in the confusion after the explosion—and with Parrott trying to break out on the other side—well, with the preparations they'd made they got across before the defenders could react." Audley nodded. "But then dummy5

Black Thomas double-crossed Parrott in turn." Nayler shrugged. "That, or perhaps the break-out went wrong and he ran into some Royalists who hadn't received the word. . . .

But either way it does give the story a nice ironic twist at the end."

"It certainly does. And Sergeant Digby had worked all this out?"

"Most of it. He is ... that is to say, he was ... a rather shrewd young fellow— for a policeman. But he was really more interested in the gold, I must admit. He wanted to know exactly how Ratcliffe had found it, he was very insistent on my telling him that."

"So you told him?"

Nayler sighed. "Well, in the circumstances I thought it prudent to do so. That was the other half of our secret, of course.

"And what did you tell him?"

Nayler blinked and didn't answer directly. "Well . . . yes, well that began when Ratcliffe came to see me first."

"When was that?"

"Oh—" Nayler lifted his hand vaguely "—some time ago."

"When?"

Nayler looked distinctly unhappy. "About a year ago, it would be."

About a year ago. Long before James Ratcliffe's death, but dummy5

after the sorting of the Earl of Dawlish's archives for the Historical Manuscripts Commission. And for a bet Professor Nayler knew both those harsh little facts, but had chosen to overlook them in his partnership with Charlie Ratcliffe.

Nor was that the only thing he had chosen to overlook, thought Audley with a sudden flash of understanding. It hadn't been simply their old mutual dislike that had closed Nayler's mouth: it had been a good old-fashioned bad conscience about more recent events.

"Of course." He nodded. "And he brought a letter with him—

a very old letter."

Whereas of late have I suceeded to thee Estate whereof mine Fathyr was seised . . .

"You know, then?" Nayler looked at him sidelong. "But of course you will have seen the sergeant's copy."

"Yes, I have. But I would have known anyway. You'd never have mixed yourself up in this just on Ratcliffe's word, there had to be proof of some kind. Was it a genuine letter?"