The sky grew bluer, was becoming dark, and the poles now were absolutely solid. There was a sense — all the more palpable in such a remote and empty place — of something gathering. We were in the midst of what may once have been considered a variety of religious experience. Absence had given way to presence.
The sky blackened and we retreated indoors. We ate quesadillas and drank dark wine and looked at the flames of the pellet-burning stove as if it were a television. The vastness outside made the interior of the cabin seem the coziest place on earth, like an igloo but made of wood and not even chilly.
Later we went outside again, into the huge night. The poles were gone, but we knew they were there. The sky was nothing but a dome of stars. We’d all been in star-studded places before, were no strangers to the firmament, but none of us had seen anything like this. Viewed from most places on earth, stars tend to be overhead. Here they poured down all around to our ankles, even though they were millions of light-years away. I am not entirely clear about astronomy, but it seemed possible that the Milky Way was obscured by the abundance of stars. The constellations were complicated by passenger jets, blinking planes, flashing satellites: rush hour in the era of interplanetary travel. The sky was frantic, the night as cold as old starlight.
I woke as the uncurtained window turned grey. Three of us met outside. It was colder than ever, as cold as the Antarctic on the nicest day of the year. The sun was peeping over the mountaintops. As at sundown, the tips of the poles began to blink and twinkle. Then, as the sun emerged into view, the poles stood stark and golden, even more sharply defined than they had been the evening before. We could see everything now, in all its clarity. This was not just because of the light. It was also, Cristina said, because we now knew what we were looking for.
When we emerged again, after breakfast, the poles were less prominent, on the way to becoming almost invisible, as they had been when we arrived. That was our first revelation: that while the grid was completely static it unfolded over time as well as in space. A narrative was at work.
. .
People like us came and observed versions of this sequence every day for six months of every year. A day was the measure of what went on here. The experience was affected by the weather, the seasons, but not by the larger movement of the planets and stars. Places like Stonehenge had been designed with the solstice in mind, may even have been celestial calendars, attempting to synch man’s experience on earth with the heavens. None of that was relevant here. The placement of poles referred to nothing other than itself. Thousands of years of study would confirm that there was no intended relation between the poles and the position of the sun, the transit of Venus or lunar eclipses. What was here was entirely man-made and appealed only to man. Unlike some Chariot of the Gods—type places — the Nazca Lines in Peru, say — it was designed not to be seen from the air but to be experienced by people, on the ground.
We worked out that there were four hundred poles. Not 399 or 401 or 402. Exactly four hundred. The number, clearly, was no accident. The poles were in straight lines, but the area they covered was not a square. Two sides had sixteen poles and the other two had twenty-five, each 250 feet apart. The area covered was a mile by a kilometre and six metres.
Our final bit of measuring was to confirm what we referred to thereafter as the Ethan-Cristina paradox.
‘The poles are all different lengths,’ said Cristina (who is tall).
‘Because they’re all the same height,’ said Ethan (who is short).
He was right. They averaged about twenty feet, but the shortest was only fifteen feet, the tallest twenty-six feet nine inches. The variations in length took account of the uneven surface of the land, so that from tip to tip of every pole was this level plane of invisible flatness. Given the precision of all the distances involved, we wondered if this place was a tribute to the god of measuring? Did even the richly stocked pantheon of Hinduism include such a deity?
So the question remained. Apart from suggesting that precise measuring could correct the wonkiness of the world, what was this place meant to do? What was its purpose? Where were we?
The last question is easily answered: we were — as you may have guessed by now — near Quemado, at The Lightning Field, created by Walter De Maria and completed in 1977. The answer prompts another question — why the subterfuge of inconceivable ignorance? — which, in turn, takes the form of further questions.
A copy of De Maria’s obsessively minute inventory and visionary manifesto, ‘The Lightning Field: Some Facts, Notes, Data, Information, Statistics, and Statements,’ is left in the hut, but even before arriving — and even if their knowledge of the stats is a little hazy — most visitors who come to The Lightning Field know roughly what they are in for. But what if we came here and had to try to work it out for ourselves, with no art-historical back-up? Asked about the consequences of the French Revolution, Chou En-lai replied, ‘It’s too soon to tell.’ That’s the response that comes to mind when pondering the significance of the great Land Art projects of the late 1960s and 1970s. With their megalomaniacal schemes and gargantuan undertakings — some, like James Turrell’s Roden Crater in Arizona, or Michael Heizer’s City in Nevada, still uncompleted after more than forty years — these artists were thinking big, not just in size and space but in time. If they succeed, the best of their undertakings have more in common with sacred or prehistoric sites than with the rival claims and fads of contemporary art. The art stuff provides an immediate context, but it is more revealing to take a different and larger perspective.
One of the most obvious things is as easily overlooked as the poles in the middle of the afternoon: everything about The Lightning Field suggests that it will be here for many years to come. So what if we visited the site years hence and had to try to figure out for ourselves what was happening here, what forces were at work, with no art-historical context (minimalism, conceptualism, taking work out of the gallery into the expanded field, etc.)? Enlarging the time scale still further, what if The Lightning Field survived after there were people left to see it? How long would it take an alien intelligence — or, to put it another way, how intelligent would an alien have to be — to work out what was going on here? (Could that be the simple mark of genius: when something is easier to conceive and create than it is to work out how it was done?)
One thing present-day visitors tend not to know about The Lightning Field—or are reluctant to accept — is that it is naïve, even a little vulgar, to expect lightning. We came in early May, on only the second day that The Lightning Field had been open for the season, but even during the peak period of storm activity, July to September, lightning strikes are exceptional. De Maria spent years searching for an appropriate spot, somewhere with a high incidence of storms. He estimated that there are ‘approximately sixty days per year when thunder and lightning activity can be witnessed from The Lightning Field.’ I don’t know if any record has been kept of the number of lightning storms that have converged on the field itself, but you would count yourself very lucky if you happened to witness what must, surely, be one of the greatest shows on earth. De Maria has rightly insisted that the light is every bit as important as the lightning (‘the invisible is real’), but calling it The Lightning Field was a sensational bit of marketing. Does any artwork have a more electrifying name?