breadth and amplitude, in fact by a return to the skirts of tlie time of Henri III,, the farthingale with its consequences, width of sleeves and height of head-dresses, and these were soon to be exaggerated in virtue of a law of
Oct
equilibrium and harmony.
Under Henri III., it was the ruff that grew up and forced the head into a portentous 'horn'; under Louis XV. and Louis XVI., it was the head-dress that became monumental.
The farthingale reappeared under the name of 'panier.' It came from the other side of the Channel. Two English ladies brought specimens to Paris, and exhibited them in the Garden of the Tuileries. The extravagant fullness of these ladies' skirts excited great surprise among the men and women who were taking their daily v/alk in the Gardens, a crowd gathered round the foreigners, and pressed on them so closely that they were in danger of being flattened, if not smothered. At length a gallant oflicer of the Mousquetaires du Roi interfered, and extricated the ladies and their paniers from a very unpleasant position.
At that time the fashions did not travel round the civilized world in six months, and disappear, without being entirely used up, in less than two seasons. They took time to come forth and be developed, and they lasted in their chief features, Avith the alterations, adjuncts, or improvements tliat were suggested every day, for several years.
The panier was destined to live throughout the century, and it took no less an event than the Revolution to kill it.
Some years elapsed before the farthingale completely reconquered Paris ; its restoration was effected slowly, timidly, by modest attempts, then, one fine day, about 1730, it won, and its undisputed reign began. All the ladies, discarding half measures and demi-paniers, adopted the large panier, six feet in diameter, which took at least ten ells of stuff to cover it.
'Panier' was the self-evident name for this extraordinary article of costume, for the first petticoat extension was contrived by means of osier or cane hoops, bird-cages in fact ; the whalebone arrangement came afterwards. A Master of Requests whose name wns
Regency liuuting-costume.
Pannier having perished in a shipwreck on his voyage home from the Antilles, his sad fate was used by cruel fashion as a pretext for giving a nickname to the panier, just then in the tiawii of its rcnowu. Prior to this were the ' little Janseiiist paniers,' coming down to the knee only ; the ' creaker ' (a bustle made of linen cloth, much gummed and folded), which creaked at the slightest movement ; the 'call-bird,' the 'finger it,' the 'wench,' and the ' tumble.' ^ All these names were inventions of a time that was by no means prudish ; there were also the more respectable small paniers called 'considerations.' For some time the large ones were called ' maîtres des requêtes.*
The large panier letl naturally to a change in the make of gowns. Then arose those most graceful, dexterously-negligent fashions which we have called by the name of Watteau, in honour of the great painter of gala gallantry, on whose canvas so many of the fair ladies of his time survive "in hoops of wondrous size," painted and patched, fan or tall cane in hand, and always ready to embark for Cyprus with some red-heeled admirer.
^ Criardo. Itonti^-on-tvnin, tàtez-y, gourgandine, culbute.
The real realm of Cytliera was, however, Paris, whether governed by the Regent or by
Flying Gowu.
Louis the Well-beloved. The century had fifty years before it, in which to gambol and amuse itself, fifty years for games and laughter, but the time Avould come when the powder and the patches were to be washed off by tears.
In this day of 'the unbraced cestus,' fashion invented loose gowns without either bodice or girdle, hanging straight from the slioulders over the wide-spread panier, or only fitted to the waist in front, and left quite loose with large folds at the back. This device gave the wearer an air of pretty carelessness and indolent OTace, the distino-uishinsr mark of the age.
The thick and heavy stuffs of the preceding l^eriod were unfit for these loose hanging gowns, and to drape the vastness of the paniers, so lighter fabrics were adopted, lawn, muslin, dimity, and other thin stuffs with bouquet patterns, or scattered flowers, or even little rural designs.
On fine days the promenades were crowded with ladies who looked as though they had come out in their morning costume, in gowns fashioned like dressing-gowns, their arms emerging from clouds of lace, and tlieir faces from soft frills, as they waved tlieir fans, and lazily clicked tlieir higli-lieeled slippers.
It was the period of the Regency ! There is a world of meaning in that word. The suppers and the orgies of the Palais-Royal were largely imitated elsewhere ; there was many a Parabère in the gay and pleasure-loving city, which had just then been thrown into fresh excitement by the fever of sjieculation. Day after day the believers in John Lav/ were either enriched or ruined ; some making fabulous fortunes that enabled them to procure every kind and every degree of enjoyment, others being beggared, so that they had to drown their sorrows in dissipation at any cost.
The satirists of the pen had plenty of material in the loose gowns, the paniers, the head-dresses, the gew-gaws, all the daily inventions of fashion. Plays and songs, the Italian theatre, and the booth in the fair, caricatures and pamphlets, ridiculed the preposterous paniers, while the triumphant paniers mocked the mockers, and swelled themselves out more and more vaingloriously.
Everybody laughed or lamented. Here were several ladies to be accommodated in a coach which could only hold one with her balloon-skirt ? Everything was too small ; the streets were too narrow ; salon-doors had to be widened to allow the overgrown ladies to pass in, just as it became necessary afterwards to make the doors higher at the top, so that the gigantic head-dresses of later days might enter without a hitch.
The arm-chairs were not big enough ; how Was a lady to sit down with those tremendous hoops, which either refused to be squeezed into the seat, or started up in the most embarrassing way ?
Nevertheless, paniers went on growing larger until the early] days of Marie Antoinette, and the skirts worn over them were laden more and more heavily with big and little flounces, lattice work, pleated frills, scallops, or ribbons arranged in a thousand different ways. These fashions were in some cases as pretty as
Large P.iuier.
they were comphcated, but in otliers they were merely absurd.
Under the gown, which continued to be worn loose and flowing for a long time, à la Watteau, the 'body' or corset strictly confined the bust, the satin bodice was pointed and the waist very long; as it was low-necked, a ' breast-front ' of lace and ribbons protected the chest from cold.
Mantles were adapted to the season or the temperature ; that is to say, they were either pi'etty little mantillas^ which just covered the shoulders, with a light frilled silk or satin hood, or cloaks covering the entire figure down to the heels; the hood was held out by a hoop of brass wire around the head. From 1725 to 1770 or 75, the fashion in gowns retained the same lines, and almost the same general arrangements, the swelling skirts, the clouds of lace, and the bunches of ribbon. The best period of the mode of the eighteenth century, that in which the Louis Quinze costume was at its highest point of elegance, was between 1750 and 1770, the middle period between the exaggeration of ^ Cofjuehichoiis (obsolete).
the Regency time and that of Louis XVI., which was no less unreasonable.
During those years her beautiful, astute, artistic, and encroaching majesty, Madame de Pompadour, reigned. If we would summon up a vision of that radiant period and realize its charm, we have but to quote the names